exciting panel on inflation panel at Sintra, with @Isabel_Schnabel chairing.
Charles Goodhart: we are in an extraordinary moment, we dont have a general theory of inflation.
we used to have two - monetarist and Phillips Curve - but none has performed well.
we also have the expectations theory of inflation - but that doesnt work either, since inflationary expectations are backwards looking and adaptive Image
oh, Goodhart is now literally reading 'the controversial and disruptive' Fed paper
Goodheart: it was the general availability & weakness of labour over past thirty years that kept inflationary pressures down.

it is the supply side shifts in labour that matter, and @Lagarde ignored it, particularly demographic decline
he also wonders about the wisdom of including owner occupied housing price into consumer price, may generate tightening pressures Image
hmm, we've returned to Friedman and PC Image
third speaker giving us some micro foundations for the 'central banks are in control' punchline Image
pity he's speaking after Goodheart, who's just demolished most of his key assumptions Image
is there a name for the New Keynesian condition of miscalculating slides to time ratio?
jaja, Charles Goodheart just called inflationary expectations theory 'extremely weak lark'
also, he's brining in a critical issues, globalisation, for which my new macro students should be grateful Image
the New Keynesian is, unsurprisingly, not impressed with the Fed paper 'if you dont have anything formal, how can you be criticised'
ok, definitely on team Goodheart, who's getting attacked because 'we solved the backwards expectation problem 30 years ago'
New Keynesians, if you come at King Goodhart you better come prepared, cause he was a central banker 30 years ago, and savaged you after Lehman Image
this is even better Image
in this brave new world, IMF Chief Economist is calling for workers of the world Unite and ask for higher wages :)
Goodhart: the trust in central bankers being able to raise nominal rates will lead to a sharp recession, worsen fiscal positions, deflate asset bubbles.
you cant raise without coordinating with fiscal
Andrew Bailey @bankofengland - I wouldnt agree Charles on irrelevance of expectations, but we certainly need better modelling to understand 'rational inattention'
love that mainstream macro modelling is again coping with its inattention to the world by blaming the regular human (the agent that ignores inflation when it should notice it)
and Yannis Stournaras brings us back to globalisation, very fittingly
what a gracious chair @Isabel_Schnabel is, excellent panel, one takeaway is that Fed paper ruffled a lot of (New Keynesian) feathers!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniela Gabor

Daniela Gabor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanielaGabor

1 Oct
let's all remember that a wage-price spiral only occurs if
firms dump wage increases into prices, instead of reducing their profits.

German workers here are asking for some share of that nice profit pie earned during pandemic.
I am also puzzled by the collective terror of worker power, only a couple of months ago central bankers and IMF chief economists were clamouring for exactly that.
workers of the world unite, just a bit below the inflation target?
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep
this paper is much more interesting in how it portrays mainstream macrofinance rather than its critique of MMT.
first, Quantity Theory of Money is, to cite Charles Goodhart, weak lark, imposing a monetarist causality on an identity.
holding that against MMT is not a serious intellectual effort. Image
fair enough, they recognize money multiplier (critical to QTM/monetarism) is nonsense Image
Read 5 tweets
22 Sep
fascinating WEF conversation on private equity as the new climate warriors:

- PE increasingly home for high carbon assets as less regulatory scrutiny and disclosure requirements
one bold claim: PE business model can reduce carbon footprint

PE make money on way out, when they sell companies to another party

if PE inherits a certain ESG/carbon footprint, if it can reduce it in 5 years time, it can create value.

ergo, PE ultimate climate warriors.
of course, 'value' is keyword, and claims that PE will have to green their companies because there are reputational costs are nonsense - Blackstone shrugged off @leilanifarha critique of their practices as institutional landlords
Read 6 tweets
22 Sep
the natural gas crisis in UK is a stark reminder that corporate farming makes us vulnerable and that the low-carbon transition cant be driven by them

ft.com/content/475ca5…
unfortunately, UN remains captured by agri-business

'70% of world’s population is fed by diverse network of small-scale producers and peasants - this group uses less than 25 percent of resources necessary in agricultural production.
industrial food chain feeds only 30% of world, while using over 75 percent of resources'
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
Amazingly, ECB has found (roughly) 40 economists to co-author and agree on fiscal-monetary interactions
reference list for the monfiscal paper doesnt bode well: two Cochrane, zero @BCoeure (2016), the most insightful ECB speech on the topic ever.

ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date…
oh, feels like 2007, when we worshiped at the altar of DSGE models.

maybe I should have said ECB found 40 DSGE economists that agree on fiscal-monetary interaction.
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
when fiscal hawks at BIS randomly choose 1995 as year of 'look how much we'd pay in debt service' counterfactual but make no reference to imperative of green public investment

bis.org/speeches/sp210…
after 15 months of close fiscal-monetary coordination, if fiscal hawks want to make a theoretical case for austerity, they need to do better than 'instability trap'.
Hawkish Alice in Fiscalaland: when you claim that central bank purchases of government debt are actually bad for fiscal position, despite the graph on previous page demonstrating the contrary.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(