This seems unsurprising and I think OBVIOUSLY the case. Manchin is an obstacle and is going to force the total number down. But Sinema seems like the one who may actually sink everything. She's never been acting in good faith thru the whole process.
2/ Let's stipulate: Manchin is super annoying, seldom consistent and a real problem for the rest of his party. But back in December it was easy to predict he'd be playing this role. It basically makes sense in the context of his state, etc etc.
3/ You wld not at all have predicted Sinema wld play this role. She's off on this quest to brand herself the bipartisan maverick back home for a number of reasons. Ironically this seems like a total misread of the political moment. She's probably a one termer.
4/ But the point is this is her theory and she's pursuing that goal. Her actions have basically nothing to do with actual policy questions. She's using bucking her party to build a story abt herself in Arizona. Generally speaking when people say oh they're doing what their ...
5/ lobbyist pals are telling them. Usually that's BS. There's more chicken and egg than that. With Sinema, I get the sense that may be much closer to the truth. In any case, if I were up there negotiating I too would be most worried about her.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshtpm

29 Sep
Back in 2004/05 Bush tried to partially abolish social security. GOP controlled the whole govt. they cld do it if they wanted to. Many Dems were saying they had to negotiate, come up with a counter, limit the damage etc. the eventually came round to the right approach …
2/ which was: no. No help, no negotiations, no counter. Nothing. This is what I mean by losing well vs losing badly. Choosing the former often means you don’t lose at all. Bush’s plan collapsed. But you can lose in ways that are devastating beyond the immediate loss.
3/ Getting stiffed on the recon bill and providing the votes for Sinemas vanity project will show a weakness that will be devastating to the Dem coalition. Better to vote the BIF down. Kill it.
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
The Times deceiving its readers about the latest debt ceiling stand off illustrates a broader point. Are we surprised pretty much the entire GOP backed an effort to throw out the results of the 2020 election and is changing laws and in other ways setting the stage ...
2/ to succeed in doing so for 2024? We shouldn't be since this is the same party which has for the last decade or so repeatedly played a game of chicken by threatening to default on the national debt. That was a big warning sign and continues to be. But the GOP ...
3/ has lied on the conventions of journalism to pretend those things aren't happening or to portray them as the products of "gridlock" or "bipartisans gamesmanship". So these criticisms aren't just about score settling or point keeping. They actually endanger the country.
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
This isn’t my experience. But I can understand someone feeling this way. First of all living through a epochal pandemic sucks and people are entitled to their experience. But there is something very hard abt the last three months. We spent almost a year in various …
2/ levels severe mitigation. And it kept getting worse. Outside of NY the winter was far worse than the early months. But all along people were hiding their time for the vax, for relief. Then the vaxes turned out to be more effective than anyone cld have hoped.
3/ Then unless you were very old you had to wait your turn. And that sucked. But relief was on the way. When people got vaxed you could see they felt like they were entering an alternative universe where the pandemic was in thx rear view mirror. So many of us can …
Read 8 tweets
26 Sep
With everything coming down to this week, most of something is vastly preferable to all of nothing. The rest of the party will have to come down from their number to get Sinema and Manchin and Gottheimer on board. The problem is that these three are not making any counter.
2/ They’re not making it possible to come to a compromise agreement. They’re essentially saying pass our bill and maybe we’ll do something or maybe we won’t. I am still cautiously optimistic that they will put something on the table and there will be a global agreement.
3/ It will mean jettisoning some big things. And that will be very tough for the rest of the party and the White House to manage because some things will get jettisoned and others won’t. And keeping everyone else on board when some ones are getting gored and others …
Read 5 tweets
26 Sep
All these Harry Jaffa students turning out to be or signing on to the be the house intellectuals of Trumpism raises the question of whether Jaffa himself would have gone full MAGA. What makes it a tantalizing question is that Jaffa died only a few months before Trump …
2/ announced his campaign in the summer of 2015. So we almost found out. I suspect the answer is that yes, he would have ended up full MAGA, red hat and all. I’m no Jaffa expert but I did spend two or three months in 1989 talking to him almost every day. I was a research …
3/ assistant that summer at a place called The Salvatori Center, a small think tank affiliated with Claremont McKenna College where I was a research assistant for Jaffa and the founder of the center and I think the first president of CMC a guy named a George Benson.
Read 9 tweets
24 Sep
There’s another dimension of this story worth addressing. It’s largely a press failure. But Dems have done too little to correct it. Again and again this battle has been portrayed as between “progressives” and “moderates”. So AOC and Bernie vs Manchin and Sinema.
2/ Thats almost totally false. Maybe not every last thing in the recon bill. But the package actually has overwhelming support in both caucuses. Overwhelming. It is literally the Presidents agenda. There are some quibbles over the SALT tax. There are some differences over …
3/ the exact scope of the climate package. There are some Dems quibbling over whether some of the social safety net programs will be made permanent. Those are real disagreements. But they’re mostly negotiable and they mostly don’t touch the scale of the package.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(