I have followed the issues surrounding the @SBCExecComm w/great interest. Given my role as @SWBTS president, I have refrained from commenting publicly b/c I think those in @SBCCP roles like mine should be very careful to opine on matters not directly related to our entities. 1/
But after today’s special @SBCExecComm meeting, I am seeing increasing calls for @SBCCP defunding, and that both grieves and alarms me b/c of unintended consequences. I certainly understand the frustration of the #SBC21 messengers’ will being repeatedly delayed or disregarded. 2/
To use the line from @CollegeGameDay, the @SBCExecComm had “one job” coming out of #SBC21: to figure out a way to do what the messengers said they wanted done the way the messengers said they wanted it done. Messengers decided not to “trust” the EC but to “direct” it, period. 3/
Now here we are, 100+ days later, w/out a successful resolution and w/what can only be described as embarrassing displays by the @SBCExecComm in meetings before the watching eyes of SBC’ers and more. From my vantage point, the present situation is inexcusable and unacceptable. 4/
The #SBC21 motion specifically included language related to having the @SBCExecComm waive attorney-client privilege (ACP) in order to facilitate the work of the task force and the third-party. The issue is not about WHETHER ACP should be waived, but only HOW best to do it. 5/
I am not an attorney, but I have spent a lot of time and money on some very good ones in my 2.5 years as @SWBTS president. Attorneys are paid to give you the advice you need in order to make the best case for what you want to either accomplish or prevent. That’s what they do. 6/
So let’s push rewind for a moment back to last Tuesday afternoon’s @SBCExecComm plenary session. It devolved into a committee of the whole, trying to hash out language and craft a proposal on the fly and on the floor. It was a colossal failure of leadership, plain and simple. 7/
The result: a 7 day waiting period of negotiation b/t @SBCExecComm officers and the Task Force, which ultimately resulted in today’s meeting: nearly 5 hours of time spent to ultimately decide to ask for 7 more days to try to figure out something that will work for everyone. 8/
This whole debacle has been painful to watch for many reasons. I know @SBCExecComm members voting on opposite sides. Both groups include friends who want to do the right thing the right way, but are a mixture of scared/confused/uncertain as to what that actually looks like. 9/
I honestly feel for @pastorrolland. He’s a good brother who is trying to do what is right. But he’s been put in an impossible situation at present, and the @SBCExecComm is now not only harming itself, it’s hurting all @SBCCP entities w/defunding calls growing by the moment. 10/
I take no joy in typing these words tonight. As a dyed-in-the-wool SBC’er, I’m committed to our identity wrapped around the BFM and @SBCCP. But so much of that is now in jeopardy. It is clear to me that the way forward will require both hard choices and difficult decisions. 11/
I believe there is a crisis of confidence facing the @SBCExecComm right now. There must be a path that will clearly and unambiguously fulfill the direction of the messengers. But it seems something must give. No more deferrals/delays. Let’s get this right and get it done. 12/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam W. Greenway

Adam W. Greenway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamGreenway

23 Jul
A “brief” thread on complementarianism, since it seems to be an increased topic of conversation in Christian circles—both on and off of social media—these days:
The Danvers Statement (1987) is the foundational document that lays out what we now affirm as “complementarianism.” 1/
Perhaps the key affirmation found in Danvers is this line, “In the church, redemption in Christ gives men and women an equal share in the blessings of salvation; nevertheless, some governing and teaching roles within the church are restricted to men.” 2/
Notice that no attempt is made to identify or to prescribe precisely what “governing and teaching roles” fall under this “restriction.” Notice also the context is delimited to “within the church,” not prescribing application to parachurch orgs, educational institutions, etc. 3/
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(