Woah. So it looks like WSJ had six full decks on this one report about Instagram harms and they are incredibly impressive and thorough studies by Facebook’s own team. They deserve enormous attention - put them under the klieg lights please. /1
While it appears WSJ was incredibly diligent, contacted all mentioned execs for comment, redacted personal info etc, they clearly had the goods and their report sure seems to have fairly represented the research - again by internal Facebook experts. /2
I mean one deck is more than 70 slides of quality intelligence on Instagram being a problem. This is indeed Jeffrey Wigand - and 60 Minutes will be introducing the whistleblower to world ahead of her testimony to it all under oath. FB assured Congress it wouldn’t retaliate. /3
Meanwhile Facebook:
- accused WSJ of deliberately mischaracterizing
- dropped one slide claiming reporting was based on it
- dropped two decks tonight, only one in substance from the six
- did a front-run on the press to cause confusion /4
So again, please put all attention on WSJ’s report, these six decks, reporting from other press, 60 Minutes and whistleblower testimony next week. As a bad actor, I wouldn’t give Facebook the time of day. /5
Finally, if I were Congress, I would reschedule tomorrow’s hearing. You won’t learn anything from FB employee. They agreed to it to get out their story first with Congress having no time to prepare as Zuckerberg did to u in 2018. Don’t be played @SenBlumenthal@MarshaBlackburn /6
I would let the 60 Minutes interview and the whistleblower testimony be what the world first hears to go with WSJ’s reporting. And I would let academics dig into the research next week to substantiate it and provide context for what is most vital. /7
And I would certainly expect more chips to fall. If I was in research, I would be resigning after being thrown under bus. Mosseri is DOA based on his deceptions about this. Clegg, Stone, Facebook PR have 0 cred left if they had any. Other major press will have more reports. /8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Because it’s going to get a lot worse. PR tip: 60 Minutes has a significantly larger audience (10mm+) than anything so far and will tease hearing. In addition, there are larger problems all coming at the same time. I’ll list them in no particular order:
10:30am ET Senate Commerce hearing will stream live here. Again, I still recommend rescheduling but so it goes. commerce.senate.gov
Live now. @SenBlumenthal pretty much just said Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg committed perjury and has bipartisan support from leadership @MarshaBlackburn and @SenatorCantwell on both shoulders. /2
I had to hop off for 45min but this is going as expected. Members are doing a good job. A couple comments from me: 1) Facebook actually does know <13 users end up getting their data collected 2) There are plenty of lawsuits and testimony showing Mark Zuckerberg owns the decision
For those who believe Facebook released the Instagram research last night on the eve of hearing, they did not. Here are the actual docs, thanks to WSJ:
(1 of 6) Teen Girls Body Image and Social Comparison on Instagram—An Exploratory Study in the US s.wsj.net/public/resourc…
Again, if I were Congress, I would postpone the hearing with Facebook this morning. For two reasons: 1) public isn’t seeing docs until this morning if at all and 2) will allow whistleblower to set the narrative not Facebook. On #1… 1/3
Facebook is a bad actor conducting information warfare on issues related to wellbeing of children. FB promised transparency - most of the slides came late last night due to WSJ reporters not FB. And industry experts will have valuable analysis once they see FB’s research. 2/3
Facebook dropped propaganda in single slide then their limited and annotated set of slides to set narrative. Whistleblower is on largest news show on - 60 Minutes - on Sunday night and testifying under oath next week. Let that be the first draft of history. Then FB responds. 3/3
2:30pm ET today. District of Columbia vs Facebook which is deep in discovery on Cambridge Analytica cover-up and Facebook is resisting discovery, depositions of anything sensitive including sharing its privilege log
Judge reviewing the two motions. First up is DC's motion to compel Facebook to produce documents including designating additional custodians (DC is rightly wanting discovery on the Facebook Growth & Monetization team) as needed. She walks through the motion and opposition.
DC now arguing motion to compel. DC counsel begins argument back in 2010 reconfirming its understanding of case noting Cambridge Analytica, and the hiding of it in 2015-onward, as representative of the harms in design decisions with the platform to turn user data into profits.
Finally. Today at 10am we’ll hear testimony from NYU researchers ⬇️ who Facebook sent a cease and desist as they gathered microtargeting info on political ads then banned outright as they gathered January 6th incitement info. Zuckerberg got to speak first.
Facebook tried to position the decision as based on FTC consent order around privacy but the FTC dismissed that publicly in a rare open letter. And press were all over it appreciatively.
Here is a link to 10am hearing if you want to hear and share why Facebook shut down the researchers access. What’s Facebook hiding? The public deserves that they #DiscloseTheData. Helpful to share that hashtag and link. 🙏🏽 science.house.gov/hearings/the-d…