Sports must now make a choice – they either prioritise the views of male-born people in female sport at the expense of women and girls. Or they can protect the future of women’s sport by looking for new ways to increase participation of transwomen. /1
The Sports Councils have put forward an option that is fair and inclusive for everyone in sport: an Open category for all alongside a fair and safe female sex category. If sports really want to be maximally inclusive, that’s what they’ll do. /2 equalityinsport.org/resources/inde…
Remember, trans people can already play sport. They are not excluded from sport. Most sports already have an open category and trans people can and do play there. /3
But what trans activists have wanted is for trans people to be able to play in the sex category they don’t belong in. That’s not how sport works – no one chooses where they belong in sport. Adults can’t choose to play in junior games. /4
...able-bodied athletes can’t choose to compete in Paralympic sports. The same should apply to trans people. People with male bodies shouldn’t be able to choose to compete in female sex category. /5
It’s great to see UK sport taking the bull by the horns. Everyone knows the current system is not fit for purpose. Even the IOC admitted that this Summer. But it’s our UK sports councils that have taken the lead to find a new way forward. They must be commended for that. /6
They didn’t quite go far enough to protect the future of sport for women & girls. They failed to give a clear signal that sport *must always* provide safe and fair access for females. It’s not optional or a ‘nice to have’. It must be the minimum requirement for women’s sport /7
Trans participation in female sport is not cost free. Women and girls pay the price. It cannot be right that a sports now continue to prioritise trans people’s preferences over fairness and safety for women. /8
Now seeing it in black and white means we can hold sports to account. Challenge them when the devalue women’s sport. They will have to own their decisions & face the wrath of women if they get it wrong. No more hand waving about balancing inclusion and fairness. You can’t. /9
Sports now face a stark choice. They either retain sex categories so that women’s sport is safe and fair OR they continue with an unfair and unsafe version of sport for women so male-born trans people can play in the category of their own choosing. /10
The sports who choose to devalue the integrity of women’s sports will now be exposed /11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
British Kickboxing Council reveals itself as unprofessional and reckless with this knee jerk response to a serious report by UK sports councils. If this dodgy outfit gets tax payer funding from @SportEngland that needs an urgent review.
Sport Councils conducted hundreds of interviews. This is the first comprehensive assessment of the views concerning the impact of trans inclusion on others. /1
"Women from a BAME background argued that success in sport was perhaps a key opportunity to achieve in a Britain where they were discriminated against because of both their sex and their race, and this was just another example of how society did them a disservice" /2
"Many interviewees were exasperated that women’s sports had made great strides in terms of participation numbers in the last 20 years, often in the face of male indifference, but that now this was all to be put at risk." /3
To develop their trans participation guidance the sports councils have undertaken the most comprehensive and in-depth consultation to date. This is impressive and should be considered the gold standard approach /1
@sportscotland@Sport_England@uk_sport@SportNINet@sportwales 166 one-to-one interviews were conducted. 98 had a minimum of 20 years involvement in organised sport such as athlete, coach, sports physician, medical specialist, sports scientist, inclusion officer, volunteer, official. Nearly all had an extensive lived experience in sport /2
@sportscotland@Sport_England@uk_sport@SportNINet@sportwales "10% of those approached declined the invitation, variously saying that the topic was “too toxic” or not wanting to “put their head above the parapet”. Some were senior people within British sport or *held advocacy roles for transgender inclusion*" /3
They evaluated the impact of their guidelines on ALL NINE protected characteristics. Not just gender reassignment, but all other equality strand too. This is the way to do it right. /2
RACE: "some respondents reported that the inclusion of transgender people in sport could be a barrier to participation for some people from ethnically diverse
communities. Therefore, race is referenced in the guidance as a consideration" /3
"Transgender inclusion in sport could be improved by adding 'open' and 'universal' categories to male and female ones, new guidance says." /1 bbc.co.uk/sport/58732146
"for many sports, the inclusion of transgender people, fairness and safety **cannot co-exist** in a single competitive model". /2
"testosterone suppression is unlikely to guarantee fairness between transgender women and natal females in gender-affected sports" and there are "retained differences in strength, stamina and physique between the average woman compared with the average transgender woman" /3
Our statement on the new guidelines for transgender participation in sport published by the UK Sports Councils /1 fairplayforwomen.com/new-guidelines…
Today, the five Sports Councils have jointly published guidance on a new approach to transgender inclusion in sport, following a lengthy process in which they consulted widely with all stakeholders including Fair Play For Women /2
The independent review concluded that the inclusion of transgender people into the female sex category cannot guarantee fair and safe competition for women and girls. /3