Sports must now make a choice – they either prioritise the views of male-born people in female sport at the expense of women and girls. Or they can protect the future of women’s sport by looking for new ways to increase participation of transwomen. /1
The Sports Councils have put forward an option that is fair and inclusive for everyone in sport: an Open category for all alongside a fair and safe female sex category. If sports really want to be maximally inclusive, that’s what they’ll do. /2 equalityinsport.org/resources/inde…
Remember, trans people can already play sport. They are not excluded from sport. Most sports already have an open category and trans people can and do play there. /3
But what trans activists have wanted is for trans people to be able to play in the sex category they don’t belong in. That’s not how sport works – no one chooses where they belong in sport. Adults can’t choose to play in junior games. /4
...able-bodied athletes can’t choose to compete in Paralympic sports. The same should apply to trans people. People with male bodies shouldn’t be able to choose to compete in female sex category. /5
It’s great to see UK sport taking the bull by the horns. Everyone knows the current system is not fit for purpose. Even the IOC admitted that this Summer. But it’s our UK sports councils that have taken the lead to find a new way forward. They must be commended for that. /6
They didn’t quite go far enough to protect the future of sport for women & girls. They failed to give a clear signal that sport *must always* provide safe and fair access for females. It’s not optional or a ‘nice to have’. It must be the minimum requirement for women’s sport /7
Trans participation in female sport is not cost free. Women and girls pay the price. It cannot be right that a sports now continue to prioritise trans people’s preferences over fairness and safety for women. /8
Now seeing it in black and white means we can hold sports to account. Challenge them when the devalue women’s sport. They will have to own their decisions & face the wrath of women if they get it wrong. No more hand waving about balancing inclusion and fairness. You can’t. /9
Sports now face a stark choice. They either retain sex categories so that women’s sport is safe and fair OR they continue with an unfair and unsafe version of sport for women so male-born trans people can play in the category of their own choosing. /10
The sports who choose to devalue the integrity of women’s sports will now be exposed /11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The ONS messed up the gender identity question in the Census leading the data to be downgraded from official stats. New work is ongoing to create a harmonised standard approach across government. /2
In the meantime the interim guidance says you must stick a health warning on any data generated using the Census-type question because some people don’t understand what ‘gender identity’ means so data quality is poor. /3
We asked whether they plan to remove Germany from the list of approved countries for the overseas route of gender recognition after the German Self-Determination Act comes into force on 1 November.
They said GR systems in other countries "constantly change" and it would update the "list annually".
/2
They ignored our key question about whether German applicants could now get a UK GRC without supplying medical reports. Just a copy and paste answer about annual updates /3
Breaking News: Census data on trans population downgraded by Stats Regulator. /1
“We consider that there is sufficient evidence that the gender identity question in the census has underperformed, with some groups of people being more likely than others to misunderstand the question.”
Analysis by Professor Michael Biggs showed flaws in the data triggering this investigation. Public struggled to understand a complicated question about gender identities matching sex registered at birth. Result was lots of people saying they are trans by mistake and inflating the figures /2
The ONS team in charge of designing the Census were captured by gender ideologues. Basic questionnaire design principles abandoned in favour of ideological language and motives. /3
The office of the Taiwanese ambassador, Vincent Yao, contacted us on Tuesday to express their “gravest concern” that we had chosen to “verbally attack a biological female” and asked that we “put an end to the act of spreading disinformation and harmful comments.” /3
Semi-final starts soon. Follow this thread for live updates. /1
Suwannapheng is a phenomenal female boxer. Silver medalist in World Championships last year. Will her female talent be enough to overcome the male sex advantage of her opponent? /2
“The lawyers advised to monitor the situation and to contact the IOC. IBA informed the IOC representatives about these tests, but no reaction followed from the IOC side.” /2
“At the next IBA Women’s World Boxing Championships 2023 in New Delhi, Khelif and Lin were tested following their consent again before their first fights. Blood sample collection was made on 17 March 2023. The findings were absolutely identical to the first test results.” /3