🧵 Dear Social Media-
God sometimes mocks (Ps 2:4) and so some things deserve it. Yet those who habitually and constantly mock, who ‘sit in the seat of mockers’ (Ps 1:1), are in great spiritual danger. Mockers nurture high pride in themselves (Prov 21:24) which appears knowing 1/
and sophisticated but ruins relationships (Prov 22:10; 29:8) and cuts them off from truth that only the humble discover (Prov 9:7-8,12; 15:12; cf. 1 Peter 5:5). To ‘see through’ everything is the same as not to see. (C.S. Lewis). 2/
Preachers and teachers who engage in a great deal of mockery toward their opponents, instead of speaking the truth in love (Eph 4:15; Gal 6:1; 2Tim 2:24-26), often nurture an abusive spirit that brings down their own ministries in disgrace. There are many on social media whose 3/
main goal, stance, & practice is to mock and deride the people whose positions they oppose. But this is spiritually dangerous for them, and it accomplishes nothing for their side.
God mocks proud mockers but shows favor to the humble and the oppressed. (Prov 3:34) Love you all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To PCA GA: WLC 139 puts “sodomy, all unnatural lusts; all unclean imaginations, thoughts...affections” in a single list all violating the 7th command. No gradations. To argue some sinful sexual desires are disqualifying for office but others are not, you can’t use the confession.
Before we put modern words like “identify” or “identity” into our Constitution we should first do a major study to be sure we are using the word to convey biblical truth. Start with terrific essays by Michael Allen buff.ly/31AAGYH; also Scott Swain buff.ly/3ybQYV1
We want to make sure we use a word that won't be considered in twenty years as opaque and obsolete.
For PCA friends at the 2021 GA. WLC 151 says these sins are more “heinous in God’s sight” than others- Paragraph 1: if the person doing the sin should know better or is a visible bad example to others. Paragraph 2: If the parties more immediately offended are—1/8
God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, leaders, the weak, and the communal common good. Paragraph 3: If the sin itself—a) breaks many express biblical commandments at once; b) is not merely a desire but is acted upon so that “reparations” cannot be made; 2/8
c) is against laws obvious not only to Christians but to general reason (“the light of nature”) and society (“civil punishments”); d) is against specific covenants and vows made to God and men; e) if done deliberately, obstinately, frequently/continuously, boastingly, and 3/8
This long tweet 🧵 is mainly for my PCA colleagues who are meeting at our denominational assembly. As we gather, I believe it is wrong to dismiss the concerns of “conservatives” in the PCA [quote marks because the whole PCA is very conservative] who want to be vigilant 1/7
in a culture that is moving into a more highly secular, and anti-religious direction. It’s right to assume that such a pervasive, anti-Christian culture may have a powerful influence on especially our younger generations. Its also right to assume that the cultural winds are 2/7
against orthodox, evangelical Christianity and that it will be very difficult to thrive and grow as a denomination going forward. As a whole body, we should be talking about this—how will we convert people and grow as a faithful communion in a culture like the one that is 3/7
Thread: There seem to be basically two kinds of critics of evangelicals. “A-Critics” say evangelicals have done wrong because they HAVE NOT lived up to their own theology. Their theology is largely good and right, but it should be practiced consistently. 1/6
Sadly, American evangelicals have allowed hyper-individualism, misogyny, uncritical nationalism, anti-intellectualism, legalism, etc to mute and distort or smother its historic doctrinal commitments. 2/6
“B-Critics” say evangelicals have done wrong because they HAVE lived up to their theology—that it IS wrong. Evangelical belief in the infallibility of the Bible, the necessity of faith in Christ for salvation, the need to be born again-should be abandoned because they're toxic. 3
Only 60% of American evangelicals (believers in the Bebbington quadrilateral) are white, and less than 10% of world evangelicals are American. Increasingly, world evangelical leadership is non-white. Don't let some white American fundamentalists define an entire world movement.
It is imperialistic to say that because of the actions of American fundamentalists--others around the world who define themselves as evangelicals are now not allowed to.
Part 4. Last 🧵: Bail’s book Breaking the Social Media Prism argues that social media is a ‘prism’ because it distorts our identities—not only as individuals—but as a society. It makes extremists seem (to themselves and others) greater than they are, and moderates more marginal
than they are. In order to ‘hack the prism’ (chapter 8) we need to change behaviors that lead to the distortions: (1) Don’t engage someone you just began to follow. Take time to patiently listen to them for a while in order to do the next two things. (2) As much as possible use
their vocabulary and terms rather than those of your own tribe. (3) Use arguments that build on and ‘resonate with the worldviews of the people you are trying to persuade.’ Rather than saying, “I am all right and you are all wrong” say— “You believe this. Great!...3/5