In Tunisia, male president stages a coup and appoints first ever female prime minister in Arab world, in apparent attempt to confuse Western observers who prioritize liberalism over democracy
We fall for this every time. That's what happens when you prioritize liberal values over democratic legitimacy, and I suppose it's something we'll continue falling for, since we don't think Arabs are ready for democracy (in part because they're not liberal yet)
As a matter of policy, the U.S. should prioritize democracy over liberalism whenever the two are in tension. We're a long way from that, however
The propaganda is already working. I would hope that those working on Tunisia in the Biden administration resist this silliness and instead stand up for democratic values—which they haven't thus far
For people who ask me why I go out of my way to distinguish "democracy" and "liberalism," this is precisely why. If we don't distinguish between them, we'll continue letting autocrats trick us about how autocracy is good for women and minorities
The UAE's entire (and rather successful) propaganda effort in Washington, DC is basically about telling gullible US officials that the UAE promotes interfaith dialogue, women's rights, and "tolerance." So clearly it works!
Nearly every single Arab dictator weaponizes Western concerns around gender equality and minority rights to justify dictatorship
The lesson is (or should be) this: whenever an Arab autocrat goes on about religious minorities or women's rights, call their bluff and ignore whatever they happen to be saying. I mean, seriously, come on. It's all so transparent. If we don't learn this now, then when?
For anyone looking for a full-throated argument on why we should ignore autocrats' claims that they're good for women and religious minorities, here's my essay on precisely that question: providencemag.com/2019/09/author…
On why the U.S. should promote democracy over liberalism when the two are in conflict:
On how a preoccupation with gender equality and minority rights has distorted U.S. foreign policy, including in Afghanistan, here's my recent @TheAtlantic essay: theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's always striking to me to go back and look at what Madison and Adams actually said about democracy. They could be quite eloquent in their disdain. There were few things they feared more than the man on the street. Instead, they supported rule by elites
More than 200 years later, although we are now a democracy, we still haven't escaped the legacy of the founders
What would it look like, though, to flirt not with "direct democracy" but democracy by random selection or what's sometimes called "sortition"?
This is a must-read from @dmarusic on the "missionary position" in foreign policy. The first two paragraphs are amusing and unexpected, drawing on Christopher Hitchens' provocatively-titled book on Mother Teresa. 1/x
Something has changed in the American worldview. There has always been a particular kind of religious certainty about progress. But it has changed. The religious certainty remains. Today, though, when the arc of history bends, it bends in the passive voice. 2/x
This is ultimately why, despite my anger at how Biden did it and his lack of empathy, I couldn't help but support withdrawal from Afghanistan. (And I'd rather have America stop its often-horrific drone war featuring military brass who shrugged at collateral damage). 3/x
I try to take the argument several steps further, including outlining how each of us can resist the urge to find ultimate meaning in politics
Secularization in the U.S. leads to very different outcomes than secularization in the Middle East. Secularists in the U.S. need politics. "Secularists" in Arab countries, because they're still relatively religious, don't need politics quite as much
For today only, @dmarusic & I are un-paywalling our two most recent @WCrowdsLive essays. Check them out! Here’s mine—a reflection on counterfactual histories, novels, politics, fear, and the long, slow process of losing hope
Some of you know I've been reading and thinking about James Salter's "Light Years" to the point of minor obsession. Anyway, the novel features this wonderful, if slightly depressing quote. 2/x
This essay was my best attempt to illustrate, with an unusual structure, how the personal and political intertwine in unexpected ways. I wanted to do something a bit more experimental to convey how lives slowly build over time. 3/x
We don't usually do this, but we're un-paywalling my latest @wcrowdslive essay for 24 hours. Sign up for free to get it delivered straight to your inbox at 9am tomorrow: wisdomofcrowds.live/signup/
We'll also be lifting the paywall on @dmarusic's latest essay, which makes a bold argument that helps put into perspective the last few weeks of anger and frustration over Afghanistan and how to remember what went wrong