I don't have time to read this but am saving it for later. The abstract says that anaphylactic death is a rare reaction to COVID vaccines, and the precise rate is unknown, but [continued]
[continued] women around aged 40 and anyone with increased mast cell burden or histamine response is at higher risk, and anyone with known allergy to any ingredient in the vaccines should not be vaccinated. [continued]
[continued] CDC recommends anyone with a previous history of such reactions be supervised for 30 minutes.
Death may occur anywhere from 24-48 hours after the vaccination and requires an injection of epinephrine to stop it. [continued]
Bombshell of a conclusion:
"In conclusion the purpose of this editorial is to encourage the population to be vaxxed to extinguish this global pandemic that is afflicting the world population & to reassure individuals that anaphylactic reactions do not occur with a higher incidence than other vaccinations."
"in order" and some punctuation was removed, and "vaxxed" replaced "vaccinated" to make it fit in the tweet.
In solidarity of up to 30,000 NYC school staff losing their jobs Monday and with the people of Australia suffering under lockdown, we are meeting Monday at the Brooklyn DOE at 65 Court Street and marching 5 miles ultimately taking us to the Australian Consulate at 4 PM.
Vaccinated people who support choice, please come! Once boosters are required you too may be counted as unvaccinated. We need you.
School staff on the fence, who did it to keep your job, we need you! This is a choice we all deserve.
School staff who didn’t get it, there’s no day to take off Monday if you’re out of work, so please come. It’s not a lost cause. Lawsuits are ongoing.
Students, your teachers and you should have the same choices! We need your voice.
If you pre-ordered the book, are a Masterpass member, or have already bought the guide in the past, you received a free copy. Please check your email for details.
This guide provides my recommendations for nutritional and herbal defense against COVID. This version covers 41 randomized controlled trials, which are the gold standard of evidence, as well as many other studies providing context for interpreting the trials.
What’s with all these trolls on Instagram and Facebook who have never peer reviewed a paper or published a peer-reviewed paper who think results they aren’t peer reviewed need to be ignored?
These trolls most commonly say this to the 6-month results of the Pfizer vaccine trial!
Like what is your point, that the approval should be withdrawn because the data hasn’t been published in a peer-reviewed journal yet?
These trolls especially come out in full force to counter the fact that there was no mortality difference in the Pfizer trial (29 deaths, 3 due to COVID, even distribution among groups).
I wonder how this will compare to the 15 deaths in the vaccine group and the 14 deaths in the placebo group in the most recent results of the Pfizer vaccine trial.
Yes I realize there was a ~95% reduction in total and severe cases, and that observational data supports a reduction in mortality.
But this guy is listing drugs failing in RCTs despite working observationally as examples of how ivermectin could be discredited.
And for mortality, “borderline significant” is a hell of a lot better than the Pfizer trial’s results.
The fair comparison between the two is the trial results, not the observational data — unless we want to just give everyone ivermectin and see if it impacts mortality.
So I'm reading Apple, "Mothers and Medicine a Social History of Infant Feeding 1890-1950," and if we are wondering why our microbiome diversity might be inter-generationally devastated, it might have to do with the obsession early hospitals had with preventing infectious disease.
In early 20th century hospitalized births, the mothers would wear facemasks in some hospitals, and in most the nurses would sterilize their nipples when they would nurse with 35% alcohol or some such solution.
Women so trusted medical authority at this point that they modeled their entire nursing experience on their hospital experience. Many of them would sterilize their nipples with boric acid or whatever they had at home before and after nursing.
It just occurred to me that pibloktoq, a form of hysteria lasting days and sometimes ending in a coma, traditionally suffered by the Inuit, may in part be a vulnerability due to their low carbohydrate intake and presumably lower CO2 levels.
The most compelling explanation is it is due to hypocalcemia during the late winter and early spring in non-coastal populations without year-round access to dried fish and fish bone.
However, hypocalcemia is strongly influenced by CO2 levels, because CO2 provides a source of acidity, allowing H+ ions to compete with calcium ions for binding to albumin.