Some big changes to the travel regulations published and came into force yesterday

Green/Amber lists gone, red list remains

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel and Operator Liability) (England) (Amendment) (No. 13) Regulations 2021

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/1107… Image
The explanatory memorandum is as useful very useful

Now just two categories of country - "Rest of the world" and "red list" (hotel quarantine)

Important details on how vaccinated travellers can prove their vaccinated status through NHS Covid Pass and international equivalents ImageImage
Also for the first time in the international travel context includes in those who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons

Need through the NHS Covid Pass to show a "medical practitioner has advised that they should not be vaccinated for clinical reasons" Image
This is what the "eligible traveller" exception (which includes those under 18) means - doesn't count for red list arrivals, who still have to hotel quarantine Image
This is the justification for the changes - vaccinated travellers are safer and reduce risk of transmission by 50-80% Image
Also, for those applying for medical exemptions from hotel quarantine, new bit on what evidence they need from a medical practitioner

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/1107… Image
I have updated my Covid resources table with the new regulations and a link to this thread docs.google.com/document/d/1ne…
Sorry, should also have said that people who do not fall within the "eligible traveller" category from "rest of world" countries will still need to self-isolate for 10 days or from day 5 if they test negative from then
Effect of these changes is anyone coming from a non-red list country who is not vaccinated will now have to self-isolate, whereas before if you came from Green List and weren't vaccinated you wouldn't have to self-isolate.
So greatly increases the importance of vaccination status

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

5 Oct
This is a highly illiberal measure. Preventing people exercising their free-speech rights in advance because they are ‘disruptive’ is fraught with risk for a democratic society. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi… Image
It is understandable that in the heat of the moment people want to “crackdown” on disruptive protests, but protests are by definition disruptive. This law would, I assume, authorise the detention of a protester to prevent them attending a protest. That is illiberal.
This government is already attempting to pass laws which criminalise “noisy” protests. Our law is already finally balanced to protect free-speech and ensure police have powers to prevent illegal conduct arising from protest. These new laws tip the balance in the wrong direction.
Read 6 tweets
29 Sep
I hesitate to try and analyse this at all, but I do think it is important that the Met Police Officer, Cousins, fraudulently used *Covid laws* as the means of abducting Sarah Everard. I imagine (though this is speculation) that he did so because he knew they were so wide...
... and poorly understood by the general public that he could convince both Sarah and any witnesses (who apparently saw the fake arrest and assumed she had "done something wrong") that they applied even though Sarah was doing absolutely nothing wrong, walking alone...
Read 9 tweets
27 Sep
Agree this is an interesting case which shows in practice how difficult it now is for a religious organisation to discriminate against homosexual people - the direction of travel in the past decade's case law has been clear
This is an important para - the wider point (which the European Court of Human Rights has been making for years) is that it's difficult to imagine any justified discrimination against homosexuals even where religious doctrine authorises it Image
Also Image
Read 5 tweets
26 Sep
One sec... what?! And how? Image
OK, more information here:

gov.uk/government/new… Image
Read 13 tweets
26 Sep
The proposals were negotiated and approved by the EHRC, as far as I am aware, so whilst Momentum may disagree with them, they cannot be said to be a flawed interpretation of the report
This is Labour’s action plan which as far as I am aware was approved by the EHRC labour.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
Key:
- EHRC issued an unlawful act notice to Labour and made legally binding recommendations
- Labour produced an action plan which EHRC then approved (labour.org.uk/wp-content/upl…)
- EHRC will to monitor and can use enforcement powers if Labour doesn't implement... 1/2
Read 4 tweets
20 Sep
Excited to receive this lovely little book by @ChristianKamali
What indeed?
Enjoying that this is not just about understanding the law it’s also about thinking about ethics
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(