How open lost to closed in Web 2 — and how Web 3 can bring open back 🧵
As @alexismadrigal wrote in this excellent essay, back in 2007 it looked like open services would dominate the internet going forward:
theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
But with the launch of the iPhone and the rise of smartphones, proprietary networks quickly won out:
In other words

twitter.com/cdixon
closed, controlled by centralized company

Beat out:

cdixon.org/rss
open, controlled by the user
(I got this framing from somewhere but can’t find the source- please @ me and I’ll add a citation :))
Why did closed, proprietary services win out?

We had the building blocks for open social networks back in 2007, including RSS and lesser known, related protocols.
But these protocols relied on outside parties to store data. For users who wanted to publish a social feed while controlling their data, this usually meant registering a domain name and signing up for a hosting provider.
Anyone who builds consumer software will tell you that an onboarding experience that requires more than a few, simple steps is ngmi.
So then services like Twitter came along that adopted the best features of open protocols but made it extremely easy to onboard and use.

The catch: you were using their database and code, handing full control over to a centralized organization.
You can see from these Google Trends charts of RSS vs Twitter what happened next.
(I wrote more about this topic back in 2017 here cdixon.org/2017/05/27/cry…)
Today, we have programmable blockchains like Ethereum. Programmable blockchains are virtual computers that run code and keep state.
When you deploy code to Ethereum, the code runs autonomously and perpetually. The author of the code can choose to have the code (and the data it operates on) controlled by a community, a person, or no one at all.
In Web 3, almost all projects choose to have the code run fully autonomously (controlled by no one) or controlled by a community.
(For those who didn’t realize that modern blockchains are fully developed, near Turing-complete computers, there are in-depth materials on the topic here a16z.com/2018/02/10/cry…
This means that in Web 3 you can now build advanced protocols that are open like RSS but also store things like usernames, social graphs, and posts in a credibly neutral way.
Combined with the right front-end clients, open services can now match the advanced functionality and streamlined onboarding of centralized services.
We’re about to see a wave of new consumer apps including social networks that take advantage of this.
This will hopefully unlock a new wave of innovation. Open services support composability— the ability to remix open services the way you can currently remix open source software.
The power of open source software is, as @naval says, that the world only has to solve each problem once
Web 3 extends this power beyond software to services, making it possible to build an open internet that doesn't compromise on features or user experience.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Dixon

Chris Dixon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cdixon

1 Oct
The Web 3 playbook: using token incentives to bootstrap new networks. 🧵
The killer app of the internet is networks. The web and email are networks. Social apps like Instagram and Twitter are networks. Marketplaces like Uber and Airbnb are networks.
Networks get more valuable with more participants, which is great when they are at scale, but cuts the other way when starting out. This is the bootstrapping problem.
Read 19 tweets
26 Sep
Why Web 3 matters 🧵
Web 1 (roughly 1990-2005) was about open protocols that were decentralized and community-governed. Most of the value accrued to the edges of the network — users and builders.
Web 2 (roughly 2005-2020) was about siloed, centralized services run by corporations. Most of the value accrued to a handful of companies like Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook.
Read 25 tweets
21 Sep
Republished previous tweetstorms on Mirror.xyz (data on Mirror is decentralized - stored on arweave.org) 👇
Blockchains are the new app stores
cdixon.mirror.xyz/brEszs7HBGmEWo…
Going from Web 2 to Web 3 - “Your take rate is my opportunity” cdixon.mirror.xyz/RoizwoGS7sh_5x…
Read 5 tweets
20 Sep
6/ Popular skeuomorphic Web 3 ideas include offline ticketing, supply chain management, and record keeping for offline assets. These may be good ideas, just as read-only websites were a good idea, but they only scratch the surface of what Web 3 can be.
7/ A lot of today’s NFTs are adaptations from the offline world of art and collectibles. This leads people to think that NFTs are limited to those domains, in the same way people once thought the web was limited to brochures and magazines.
8/ Tokens—fungibles and NFTs— are better thought of as new digital primitives, similar in flexibility and generality to past digital primitives like the website.
Read 12 tweets
20 Sep
1/ Tokens are a new digital primitive, analogous to the website 🧵
2/ Major computing waves generally have two eras: the skeuomorphic era and the native era.
3/ In the skeuomorphic era, the design thinking is largely adapted from older domains. For example, the early web was mostly digital adaptations of pre-internet activities like letter writing and mail-order shopping. Websites back then were mostly read only.
Read 4 tweets
22 Aug
1/ Topic: Turning networks into economies 🧵
2/ We spent the last 20 years building networks on the internet. Social media platforms like Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and Discord are networks, which can be divided into billions of smaller networks, consisting of followers, friends, subscribers, backers, etc.
3/ These platforms gave many people an audience who didn’t previously have one. But due to fundamental structural misalignments between the networks and the companies that own them, we’ve seen increasing tension around these networks’ rules and economics.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(