@gardening_kate People who work hard should be able to live well. On their earnings, without the indignity (as many - not me - see it) of having to rely on benefits.
6/
@gardening_kate This will mean paying more for goods and services.
We should do so.
We are not entitled to cheap G&S off the back of exploited labour.
7/
@gardening_kate This will mean higher prices and inflation. I'd guess only temporarily. And it will risk exporting even more work to exploit people in lower wage countries.
But it would genuinely help with reducing inequalities. "Levelling up", if you must.
8/
@gardening_kate I really hope Johnson means it. I hadn't seen him as a socialist, prepared to go further than the Labour Party folk who opposed raising the minimum wage.
I doubt his ERG/CRG crazies will allow him to do it.
9/
@gardening_kate I doubt Johnson's crazy ERG/CRG members will allow him to do it. Why would they? They benefit far too much from exploiting people (and not just poor people - anybody who isn't stinking rich).
But let's use what he said, regardless of whether he meant it.
10/10
1/ Regarding infections in schools, a colleague has pointed out that it is Department for Education directives that require schools to stay open, not PHE advice.
I am aware of this.
2/ Before I retired in January a complaint was made against me by the education sector for refusing to change my advice that a school or section of a school should close because of an outbreak of Covid-19 that was putting staff, other students, and their families at risk.
3/ The complaint went nowhere - I was giving the right public health advice, no matter how awkward it was.
So can measles, which occasionally causes SSPE - a progressive and invariably fatal brain disease, which typically becomes apparent years after measles infection. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subacute_…
About a century ago something - almost certainly virus - caused an epidemic of encephalitis lethargica. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encephali…
How do we know that SARS-CoV-2 won't do something similar, possibly years after infection?
The answer is that we don't. It might do this.
That's one reason why I worry so much about the "children aren't at risk" messaging. It will be years before we will be able to say this with confidence.
1/ Like so many of us, I have been watching, aghast, as evil forces take over Afghanistan, and wondering "how can this be happening?"
It's not my area of expertise.
I think it's a proxy war.
2/ I think many of the Taliban fighters (and financial backers) are not Afghans, but extremists from other countries, who want to impose a misogynistic, illiberal culture on Afghanistan (initially). Probably ultimately on the world; but Afghanistan is weak and susceptible.
3/ But what do I know?
I hear people saying - "we cannot, indefinitely, hold the line with our military - eventually the local government must do this, and we must withdraw. We cannot continue to lose our own people's lives, and pay the vast costs."
1/ Are we still at the point [genuine question] where a dose of Covid vaccine given in eg UK or USA deprives somebody in a poorer country from a dose?
And if so - is that because we haven't done enough to ramp up production?
What should be our priority now?
2/ Should we be boosting production in Africa, Asia, South America, and elsewhere?
3/ Will there come a point where the argument that we shouldn't vaccinate [lower risk groups] in rich countries until higher risk groups in poorer countries have been vaccinated becomes irrelevant, because there's enough manufacturing capacity everywhere?