Breaking: Durham’s indictment of Sussmann reads like a conspiracy indictment, but one significant piece is only hinted at. The indictment describes “purported” DNS lookups and quotes from internal emails sent to and from cyber scientists, including Tech Executive-1 (Joffe) and
Tea Leaves (April Lorenz), suggesting their proof of a secret communication channel between Trump and Alfa Bank was weak. The indictment only hints that underneath it all, the evidence presented by Sussmann to the FBI was bogus. Many in this corner of Twitter, including yours
truly, took this hint from Durham of fabricated evidence and drew several conclusions as to where the investigation is headed. Today, thanks to @codyave , we now have a copy of a RICO suit filed in state court in PA in June 2020, by Alfa Bank against “John Doe” defendants.
This lawsuit, for the first time, describes in detail how unknown persons sent spoofed emails to Alfa Bank from May through Sept 2016, to “manipulate “ essentially “fabricated “ DNS lookups from Alfa Bank servers to the Trump Organization servers under the control of Cendyn.
It goes on to describe a second set of lookups in February and March 2017, prompted by another set of spoofed messages to Alfa Bank, sent from a fake domain name that combined Alfa Bank and Trump Org in one address, prompting DNS lookups to both. This second set of manipulated ,
fabricated DNS lookups coincided with Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA and news reports by CNN in February, discussing the back channel communications. The significance of this lawsuit, which has attached expert reports detailing this scheme, is that one can fill in the blanks of
the Sussmann indictment. Now we have the details of evidence that the entire DNS lookup story was deliberately fabricated by some very sophisticated people. Durham likely has proof that it was all a frame up. This suit puts Max and Tea Leaves in the middle of the chain.
Alfa Bank claims Max and Tea Leaves were the scientists who “discovered” the DNS logs, after having been tipped to look for them. It alleges there is another group that actually performed the spoofing and manipulation. The Sussmann indictment does not contradict this theory, but
it still allows for the possibility that Max and Tea Leaves were the original culprits. We’ll have to wait for more shoes to drop. But the information laid out in Alfa Bank’s RICO suit helps fill in some gaps in the Sussmann indictment and is the best evidence we’ve seen that
Durham is likely to be targeting an overall conspiracy to fabricate evidence to be turned over to the FBI and to the media, both during the campaign and during the early days of Trump’s presidency. Anyone want to guess what the CIA’s role was?
P.S. - The cover page of this suit shows it was filed on Sept 7, 2021, not the June 2020 date that appears on the signature page.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alan Dershowitz and other lawyers have filed a civil RICO class action case against Dominion and its PR firm, for engaging in “Lawfare” against ordinary citizens who worked as poll watchers, election personnel, etc during the 2020 election. Plaintiffs each received letters from
Dominion or its PR firm threatening billion dollar legal action, demanding retractions of unspecified defamatory statements, and demanding preservation of large sets of private records and communications. The claim is that the plaintiffs were guilty of nothing more than carrying
out their civic duty by reporting election irregularities and signing affidavits describing what they saw. Many affidavits were filed or were meant to be filed in court proceedings. Most didn’t even mention Dominion. Nevertheless Dominion allegedly engaged in a nationwide
Those interested in the details of the Sussmann case, as well as breadcrumbs Durham has left indicating where he may be headed, there are two articles you should read. First us by Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke in Epoch Times: theepochtimes.com/details-in-mic…
Jeff and Hans do a stellar job of describing the case and persons identified in the indictment. The second is by @Techno_Fog , and goes into detail on the ins and outs of possible defendants in conspiracy charges soon to be brought by Durham. Here’s @Techno_Fog ‘s excellent
Bongino’s show today about the coverup both inside the FBI and by people like Sussmann bringing tips and evidence- a coverup that concealed their source, the Clinton Campaign- reminds me of another instance that fits the same pattern. On Sept 23, 2016, Christopher Steele met with
DOJ lawyer Bruce Ohr, and relayed to Ohr some of the fabricated claims about Trump, including the Alfa Bank fiction. Ohr testified that Steele said who he was working for, but it was a strange name Ohr had never heard before and couldn’t remember. If Ohr is telling the truth,
Steele lied. He and his firm Orbis were working under a contract with Fusion GPS (which Ohr was certainly familiar with, because his wife worked there), which in turn was working under a contract with Perkins Coie, the Clinton Campaign’s lawyers. BTW the five year anniversary of
This is a big deal. Tina Peters, Clerk of Mesa County, CO, got suspicious when last April, Dominion Voting announced they wanted to install new software on all voting system EMS computers in the state. Ms Peter’s surreptitiously had the EMS server in her county imaged both before
… and after the software update. She now has released a forensic report comparing the before and after images, and the findings are stunning. The report found that a majority of the log files were deleted or overwritten, including all that could show whether the server was
connected to the internet. Even worse, the entire SQL database files from past elections, including 2020, were deleted and can no longer be found on the server. As the report makes clear, these changes and deletions violate federal law regarding preservation of election records.
That the Sussmann indictment is an undisguised signal that conspiracy charges are soon to follow is transparent in the first few paragraphs of the indictment. One need not read past page one to understand where Durham is heading. All unlawful conspiracies have an object or
purpose. For example, a group of criminals might meet one night to plan to rob a bank the next day. When the robbers get caught and charged with conspiracy, the charging papers will describe the object of the conspiracy to be the robbery of the bank. In the Clinton Campaign
conspiracy, the object or purpose was successfully obtained beyond the wildest dreams of any of the conspirators. Durham begins the Sussmann indictment with a description of the success achieved by the conspiracy: Paragraph 1 describes and quotes from a NY Times article in
But Durham’s speaking indictment has flipped the script. A year ago everyone was focusing on a possible conspiracy involving high level gov’t actors: Comey, Brennan, Clapper, and maybe even Obama. Durham is likely still interested in the govt part of Spygate, but on a smaller
… scale. But his speaking indictment against Sussmann lays out a powerful overarching conspiracy by private actors to frame Trump and his associates- particularly when you factor in what’s been made public about the Steele dossier. This indictment describes a flurry of