this exactly. the fact of the matter is that some set percentage of the population is going to behave recklessly regardless of the form of transportation they use. but reckless driving is infinitely more dangerous than reckless cycling and much, much more common.
like, do people not notice how practically every other person driving is on their phone, sometimes with it directly in front of their face?
in fairness to drivers, it is also true that too much car infrastructure is designed to move a vehicle as quickly as possible through a space. think cities with wide streets and multiple lanes cutting through commercial (and sometimes residential) areas.
in charlottesville, that looks something like 5th street extended, which incidentally has seen a significant number of accidents and deaths over the years. several of trees on the median have memorials.
the speed limit on this roughly 1 ¼ stretch of road is 45 mph. there are two lanes. it cuts through a residential area and there are no easements. it is designed for speed and not surprisingly, people do highway speeds on it. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with b-boy bouiebaisse

b-boy bouiebaisse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbouie

5 Oct
the one thing i don’t get is why the authorities haven’t just closed crystal lake to the public. by jason takes manhattan, dozens of teens have died at the lake and in the surrounding area. why not close it to the public? or better yet, fill it in with concrete.
“local activists try to shut down crystal lake but authorities refuse to because it is too profitable thus facilitating jason’s return” is actually a pretty good premise for a reboot
Read 6 tweets
4 Oct
the core of peter parker's character arc is that he was a shitty, self-absorbed kid who through chance and tragedy gained the opportunity to be something so much better, and he devotes his life to trying to achieve that
not here to tell people they can't like the new spider-man stuff i'm just saying that there is a reason the character has endured for 60 years and it a lot of it has to do with the inherent pathos of "you could have saved your surrogate father's life if you weren't such a jerk."
Read 6 tweets
1 Oct
@davidshor This is useful in that it clarifies my critique of this discourse. From the perspective of a practitioner it makes sense to focus on the actions of the Democratic Party because that is where one can have the most influence…
@davidshor …but from the perspective of someone trying to understand what is actually happening, the intense focus on marginal changes in rhetoric to the exclusion of the interaction of exogenous events with structural conditions in American politics is very frustrating.
@davidshor Like, from the “trying to understand things” perspective, the rise of BLM and the heightened salience of race and policing would seem to be a powerful influence on WWC voting irrespective of what individual Democrats said or did, given the racialization of US politics.
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep
wildest thing is he did this in slides
america is back, baby
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
a 5:35am train from Richmond to Union Station is great. if you could get an earlier return train (say about 4:30) then this would make for an ideal commute.
state needs to increase service on the roanoke to DC line, which i think is in the works.
Read 4 tweets
25 Sep
Thinking about the duplex that was converted into a single-family home with no review or public input, versus the year’s worth of steps you have to go through if you’d like to build more than two homes on a lot. Seems bad!
I am 110% sure that no one in Charlottesville complaining about developer teardowns has ever said a word about older, (relatively) modestly-priced SFHs being torn down to build gigantic, high six-figure SFHs.
Our NIMBYs have actually no problem large, three-story residential structures, as long as they are for a single (rich) family.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(