For me the weirdest thing about covid has been realizing that the common cold is a ragtag museum of coronavirus pandemics past, all eventually tamed by becoming ubiquitous in early childhood, which we should have paid so much more attention to.
It was kind of like a "birds are dinosaurs" moment in terms of putting things into perspective. Early on I thought covid was a cold that tried to rise above its station, but now I realize it's where colds come from to begin with.
Nice brief article about trying to map the origin of "common cold" coronaviruses we all get onto past pandemics ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Anyway, where my novel rhinoviruses at? You just going to let yourself get punked like this?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The nature of progressive power in 2021 is odd and interesting.
1. They exercise a veto over moderate legislation 2. They can defeat moderates in safe Democratic districts 3. They dominate NGO world, political organizing, and large news organizations
For those of us who are not progressive, a lot of it is like watching a repeat of education polarization and ideological sorting that happened on a national scale repeat itself within the Democratic Party. In this dynamic, purity of purpose is rewarded and equated with strength.
There's a feedback loop between legislative paralysis and ideological polarization that makes everything worse. When it is impossible for any legislator to be effective in their job (because the institution is paralyzed), there's no disincentive to electing charismatic extremists
The upshot of all the drama in Congress this week is that the House Democrats sent themselves home on a two-week vacation, having passed nothing except a 30-day extension for highway funding that is now stuck in the Senate. Some DOT employees have already been furloughed.
The Democratic leadership talks about the urgency of the moment, but behaves in practice as if they have all the time in the world. Recall that this is the same House majority that sent itself home for months at the height of the pandemic, when the country needed adult leadership
So we went from a situation yesterday where the existential threat posed by climate change could only be solved by immediate legislation, where American families were suffering and needed help, to one today where everyone in Congress is just going to chill for a couple of weeks.
This is a very nice op-ed on climate that points out two obvious things on one else talks about: the heating will get worse no matter how much we cut emissions, and geoengineering (messing with the atmosphere to reflect sunlight) will become more appealing nytimes.com/2021/10/01/opi…
You can mess with the atmosphere to achieve temporary cooling the old-fashioned way (try to blow up a stratovolcano) or in a number of new ways. But the key point is that unlike cutting emissions, it's not a collective action problem. One country can say "fuck it" and go it alone
The author of this piece is an enthusiast. I'm Slavic and tend to think that massive geoengineering stunts are a way to discover even worse unintended consequences in real time. But the author and I can both agree that this option will grow to dominate the conversation on climate
There's a folk belief on the left that some combination of gerrymandering, Citizen's United and disenfranchisement is all that keeps Republicans in power in the face of majority opposition. To me, the scarier scenario has always been that they'll win fair elections outright.
The Democrats have allowed themselves to become the party of the highly educated, and their plan for staying in power is not to break out of this trap, but to educate the rest of the electorate, who of course don't understand that they're voting against their own interests.
Campaigning by having educated people tell the uneducated that they're either being racist or stupid is a bold strategy, but I'm afraid it maps the former's love of self-flagellation onto the latter, who don't share it.
One factor driving the urgency of this week's legislative drama is that the House is eager to send itself home on Friday for another 16 day vacation.
Congress's monthly vacations are usually given euphemisms like "District Work Period" or "Committee Work Period", but I like that in December they just give up any pretense.
One response I'd like to see tried against the filibuster is making the minority party actually do it. Keep the Senate in session 24/7 if they like to talk so much. The pre-emptive surrender to the tactic, while still allowing long Senatorial vacations, is a poor use of power.
Is there good expository writing anywhere about what would actually happen if the Treasury respected the 'debt ceiling' and defaulted on some payments for a few days?
I'm struggling to reconcile the averred cataclysmic consequences of a U.S. default (electrons would become unbound and the earth turn into plasma) with why Democrats won't take simple unilateral measures like minting the coin, amending senate rules, or ignoring the debt law.
If it's just a case of default kicking Wall Street in the nuts for a bit, then I'm all for calling this bluff. But I'd like to read something informed about the systemic effects of floating US treasury checks for a few days