Hillary Clinton said she was personally progressive & publicly more moderate. Many accused her of being disingenuous. But this balance is true of most of our modern major Dem leaders, including Biden. A failure to understand this has led to poor analyses of Biden's agenda.
The Dem party is ideologically diverse. There is the far left edge--AOC, Sanders, Warren--& the moderate edge--Manchin & Sinema. Then there are those who operate in the Center Left. Many of these politicians are quite progressive but move in line w/ what is politically possible
Most of our leaders--B. Clinton, Obama, Pelosi, & Biden--fit this mold to some extent. They identify where the country is & where the party is & where there is a space to move a bit left. This is typical for leaders, given they have to represent more than one ideological faction.
Pelosi, in particular, is quite progressive. On a personal level, there is probably very little daylight between her & Warren on economic issues. Biden is perhaps slightly less personally progressive than Pelosi, but is definitely not a recalcitrant ideological moderate.
Biden & Pelosi have clearly identified this as a moment where they don't need to moderate on economic policy. "Big & Bold" is within the realm of the politically possible. The press doesn't seem to understand this, which is why they keep painting them as opposed to progressives.
To be clear, I'm not defending any politician's record. Everyone I mentioned, w/ perhaps the exception of Pelosi, has done a number of things I disagreed with. I'm offering a description of who they are as political actors. Not a defense of any action

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

3 Oct
Alaska only has a handful of hospitals & they are past capacity. Due to COVID's ravaging of the kidneys, there is now a dialysis shortage that affects all kidney patients. I wonder how many non-COVID kidney patients have been impacted by this? nytimes.com/2021/10/03/us/…
COVID's impact on kidney patients overall deserves attention. Each year, there are about ~100k people who are on the waitlist for transplants. During COVID, donations have gone down & waitlist time has increased. "Elective" surgeries cancelled. Now add a dialysis shortage to that
Unmitigated infectious disease causes immense societal harm. There is mass death & disease from COVID & then there are all of those who are the disease's collateral damage. The "excess deaths." We need to remember them too.
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct
I wrote a piece for Foreign Policy about infectious disease control in a liberal society, in which I addressed two questions: 1. are mandates & other restrictions on individual behavior new? (no) & 2. can they justified within liberalism? (yes). foreignpolicy.com/2021/10/02/cov…
Vaccine mandates are not taking us down a dangerous new path to authoritarianism. They've been around for a long time, as have much stricter mandates on human behavior. But just because these restrictions aren't novel, doesn't mean they're justified. So I explored this Q as well
How we justify interfering in individuals' behavior is at the core of debates w/in liberal philosophy. One way to get at justification is through a careful examination of 1. burden to the individual, 2. benefit to the individual, 3. harm prevented to the broader community
Read 11 tweets
1 Oct
In my latest for @johnastoehr, I wrote about three key problems with the press's coverage of Biden's Human Infrastructure Bill. Contrasting the coverage of Biden's bill w/ coverage of LBJ's Great Society is also quite revealing editorialboard.com/joe-bidens-pla…
Problem #1. Biden's bill wouldn't just be transformative policy. The philosophy underlying the bill is revolutionary, as it attempts to redefine what kinds of infrastructure render society stronger. The press has failed to clearly express this game-changing philosophical debate.
When I look at the bill through the lens of "infrastructure," here's what I see: the strengthening of a wide network of human connections. Aid for children. Aid for the parents of children. Aid for those children's grandparents. We reinforce these networks & we reinforce society.
Read 16 tweets
1 Oct
Elections are complicated, as are shifting coalitions, but I think a lot of the preconditions for Trump's victory were in place in 2008/2012. The GOP just didn't realize it, nor had they found the right candidate. Their base was already the party of Palin/Trump, not McCain/Romney
I don't think white working class voters moved away from Dems after 2012 in substantial numbers b/c of specific policies. They were already moving away, but there were still some pockets of Blue Dogs in the Midwest who disliked GOP candidates more than the Democratic party.
Romney/Ryan were especially weak in this regard. The GOP base was not about conservative economics--they didn't really like these policies--they were already about culture wars. Trump as a candidate flipped a switch that was already years in the making.
Read 10 tweets
30 Sep
I’m at a fair in rural PA and it is intense. For example, here is a game where you pay five dollars to break as many beer bottles as you can in a minute
An excess of riches
Great selection of knives and brass knuckles!
Read 7 tweets
30 Sep
The worst thing about Sinema is not that she is a moderate, but that she is a terrible civic servant who seems flippant about her duty to the public. My politics are closer to Sinema's than to Lisa Murkowski's, but at least Murkowski treats her position w/ gravity.
The 3-4 relatively more decent Republicans distinguish themselves from the rest of their party b/c they actually seem to have a sense of civic duty as representatives in a democracy. Sinema-& no other Democrat-not even Manchin--acts more like the rest of GOPers. No sense of duty
Alaskans can call Murkowski up and know that she will at least listen. Maybe she'll still toe the party line, but there is open communication between her & her constituents. That line of communication just doesn't seem to exist for Sinema. There's no sense of accountability.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(