Imagine being an adult human being, a member of the US Congress, and writing these words.
All right, for ages I've been meaning to do thread on the War on Christmas. I suppose this is as good/bad a time as any.

So here's a thread on the WoC, its underlying structure, and what it reveals about [waves hands] all the other difficulties the US is facing.
I've always thought it's worth examining the WoC more closely, not because it's particularly important, but almost the opposite: because it's so obviously silly & the stakes are so low, it's easier to see the underlying dynamics clearly, w/out strong priors getting in the way.
To review: once upon a time, pretty much all US stores & public facilities put up Christmas decorations & had clerks & employees say "Merry Christmas!" around the holiday season. It was a reflection of the total dominance of white Christian culture in the US.
Over time, demographics & opinions shifted, at least in some quarters. It became clear that centering Christmas excludes Jews, Muslims, atheists ... all the many US subcultures that don't celebrate xmas. Some businesses/institutions became leery of alienating customers/patrons.
Some places replaced Xmas decorations & "Merry Xmas!" with more generic *holiday* decorations & "Happy holidays!" The idea was that the more generic approach would welcome Christians but *also* welcome other cultures -- welcoming all, alienating none. What's the problem?
Anyway, RW media got ahold of this & spun it into a "War On Christmas," telling listeners & viewers that it was the first step to eliminating Christmas altogether & part of a larger war on Christianity. (I dunno why I'm rehashing this background, I'm sure you all know it.)
Why is this interesting? Because it makes the conceptual structure of the US culture war extremely clear. Most culture war struggles share this structure.

First thing to say: generic "holiday" celebrations & greetings do not hurt or diminish Christians or Christmas.
That's crucial. Nobody's targeting or trying to diminish Christmas. Everyone who celebrates it can continue doing so.

What generic-holiday does is *decenter* Christmas. It renders Christmas just one holiday celebration among others, Christianity just one culture among others.
In trying to accommodate everyone, generic-holiday implicitly says that Christians are not *special*. They are one group living among other groups, as equals, all of which are free to live their cultures as they see fit, none of which have a right to dominate or exclude others.
And that, of course, is precisely the problem for the reactionaries on the right. For them, on a deep level, being dominant -- having your culture, your folkways, your needs, your feelings centered -- is *part of* the culture. Without domination, the culture is nothing.
That's why so much of the War On Christmas rhetoric is about how Christmas is being "destroyed" by this, or how Christianity will be "wiped out." If they lose being centered, lose being dominant, then in a very real way they *do* lose a culture premised on hegemony.
"To those accustomed to domination, equality feels like oppression." There's a reason versions of this cliche are everywhere these days -- we're seeing it play out in arena after arena. To reactionaries, being told their culture is one among equals feels like erasure.
Silly as it is, the War On Christmas clearly exposes the fundamental struggle unfolding in the US.

To some of us, the essence of the US is as a neutral framework, where any culture can thrive, anyone from any background can succeed, all are treated fairly & with dignity.
Obviously the US has never lived up to that ideal, but as Obama said so eloquently, the struggle to come closer & closer to that ideal *is* America -- it's the most American thing of all. All those outsiders who forced the US to be more fair & open are the real American heroes.
Reactionaries, on a deep & fundamental level, do not share that vision of America. To them, America is a white, patriarchal, "judeo-christian" nation -- a particular people, a particular culture. Sure, we'll accept guests, Others can live here, but never forget who's in charge.
In some sense it's a trivial question: Do you say "happy holidays" & accommodate everyone or say "merry Christmas" & implicitly tell everyone who's not a Christian to accept, without complaint, that they are secondary, subsidiary, peripheral -- *less*.
But w/in that trivial question is embedded ALL the questions facing the US. Are we trying to be a genuine multiethnic, multicultural, diverse society, united by a framework of neutral rules that treat us all the same? Do we want everyone to feel welcome, w/ equal citizenship?
Or are we, at root, a white patriarchal Christian society that, at its discretion/whims, sometimes allows other kinds of people to live among us? Is the declining dominance of that subculture tantamount to America itself declining? Is diversity our enemy, as Tucker Carlson says?
That fundamental struggle is reflected, in a fractal way, in the silly fight over Christmas. It's just one more way for the hegemonic demographic/subculture to tell the rest of us, "if we don't get to dominate, we're erased, and we'll blow it all up before that happens."
You're seeing it everywhere now with rising right-wing violence & extremism. On some level, white patriarchal Christian culture already realizes that loss is inevitable -- and it is fully ready to bring the whole structure down before it will live as equals among equals.
The real question this raises for me -- the ultimate question of America, really -- is whether it's *possible* to have a true multiethnic multicultural society of equals. Is it possible for everyone to be happy even if no one gets to hear their special holiday greeting in public?
Or are there just too many reactionaries, too many people for whom the only alternative to domination is submission/humiliation, too many people who simply can't *conceive* of genuine equality, for the thing to work? Can a country w/ NO privileged culture survive & prosper?
I dunno. (I used to be a confident Yes, a confident believer in the possibility of true democracy, but now ... I dunno.)

Anyway, that's what the War on Christmas gets me thinking about. </fin>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

5 Oct
For the record, I'm against following people into the bathroom & filming them. But let's be serious: this is the best thing that could happen to Sinema. Is she now or was she ever in any physical danger from progressives? No. They stood at a distance & asked Qs about policy.
Anybody not demagoguing knows that nerdy progressive activists asking Sinema policy questions are not a real danger. But they're enough to prompt a tidal wave of garment-rending about Civility on Both Sides. They're enough to make her just the beleaguered heroine she wants to be.
There's nothing Sinema wants more, & nothing that would be better for her politically at this very moment, than being seen as a brave independent holdout, beset by deranged activists but unmovable in her principles (whatever they are, she won't say).
Read 13 tweets
3 Oct
Hyping up (or just inventing) danger from leftist radicals is how fascists aligned with government power create a permission structure for greater repression. "We have to do it, we're just reacting to antifa!" Putin, Orban, Erdoğan -- always the same.
opb.org/article/2021/1…
This is why RW media spins its audience up on ACORN, New Black Panthers, Antifa, or whatever it will be next week. They know the mob needs some excuse, some kind of permission to indulge its hatred & violence, so it says: look at our evil opponents! We HAVE to be like this.
I don't even think it's a Machiavellian thing. I think when Glenn Beck connected all his various enemies & Others on that chalkboard into one grand conspiracy of Them, he believed it! It's something reactionaries need, psychologically. So they project it.
Read 5 tweets
30 Sep
Sure, I agree with everyone saying that the solution to this is to elect more Democratic senators, but let's just pause & reflect on the fact that that 50 Dem senators in Congress today represent *40 million more people* than the 50 Republicans.
This should be the backdrop to every story about Democratic challenges. At every level of the US system, the voice & power of white rural & exurban voters is amplified. Dems have already won over a majority of the country's voters -- it just doesn't matter.
I wrote this when the climate bill failed in 2010. Same thing then: if you have legislation supported by the public & majorities in both houses of Congress, *that ought to be enough*. It is ludicrous that you can accomplish all that & it's "failure."
grist.org/politics/if-yo…
Read 8 tweets
30 Sep
We will now shape US policy according to the arbitrary, idiosyncratic, empirically & theoretically unsupported changes to this popular bill made by one conservative old white guy elected with under 300K votes. Great way to run a country.
Here's Manchin's memo. He wants to strictly means test any money spent to help poor people, but he wants to keep fossil fuel subsidies intact. static.politico.com/1e/ef/159cabd5…
Keep in mind: he says he's worried about spending too much. He says he's worried about debt. He says he's worried about inflation.

But he wants to keep fossil fuel subsidies intact.

Boy it would be SUPER awesome if some DC reporter asked him about this contradiction.
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep
This is a bunch of vapid bullshit & conservative talking points that do not address any of the specific issues being negotiated.

"Vengefully tax for the sake of wishful spending"? Just fuck all the way off.
One thing this statement makes very clear is that Manchin spends most of his time surrounded by rich old white conservatives. Not just the big stuff, there are tons of little tells throughout -- little habits of thought & rhetoric. He is fully in that bubble.
Note the central self-contradiction, so familiar from right-wing rhetoric that we barely notice it any more:
1. We're in a "brutal fiscal reality," we can't pay for existing programs, inflation is on the rise, BUT ...
2. we can't raise taxes on the wealthy.
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep
"Democracy advocates" 🤔 washingtonpost.com/politics/as-tr…
Are we headed for a situation in which the US media does a both-sides on the value of democracy itself? Yes. Yes we are.
I once wrote a piece with the subhed: "Journalism cannot be neutral toward a threat to the conditions that make it possible." But ... apparently it can! vox.com/policy-and-pol…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(