The Supreme Court's order list is here: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…

The court swats away the challenge to Trump's border wall "in light of the changed circumstances."
Justice Breyer, writing alone, once again questions "the constitutionality of the death penalty."

At the point, the only (small) step he could take to really combat the death penalty is step down so a younger progressive can continue this battle. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Didn't the Priests for Life get the memo that the justices aren't just a bunch of partisan hacks?!
Justice Sotomayor once again serves as the conscience of the court by highlighting injustices in relatively obscure cases. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…

First, Thomas v. Payne. a capital case in which the 8th Circuit pulled a nasty trick to deny relief.
Second, Gann v. US, flagging an ACCA question for a future case. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…

I wrote about Sotomayor's careful attention to major injustices in minor cases last term: slate.com/news-and-polit…
Anyway, happy First Monday! It's the start of a new Supreme Court term.🥴 For the first time ever, you can listen to oral arguments live from the courtroom, right here: supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments…
And before arguments begin, here's one more solo Sotomayor opinion in a tragic qualified immunity case, James v. Bartelt. Sotomayor writes that QI "does not protect an officer who inflicts deadly force on a person who is only a threat to himself." supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Joseph Stern

Mark Joseph Stern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mjs_DC

4 Oct
The first question at oral arguments this morning was asked by Justice Clarence Thomas, which suggests he will continue to ask questions even though they’re back in the courtroom! (He was largely silent until they went telephonic.)
Here is Chief Justice Roberts formally closing out the last term and kicking off the new one from inside the courtroom. He also notes that Justice Kavanaugh will participate remotely and welcomes the new Marshal of the Supreme Court, Colonel Gail Curley.
This is standard administrative stuff you hear when you attend oral arguments in person. It’s just neat to hear it livestreamed from inside the courtroom for the first time. In the bad old days, SCOTUS did not include it when providing post-argument audio.
Read 5 tweets
28 Sep
A conservative 11th Circuit panel pauses the appeal of Georgia's six-week abortion ban. Why? The panel hopes that SCOTUS will overturn Roe v. Wade, allowing it to uphold Georgia's ban, too. acluga.org/wp-content/upl…
This order, translated: "Under current precedent, Georgia's six-week abortion ban is obviously unconstitutional. But we don't like that precedent. So we're going to keep this case on ice in the hope that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe, allowing us to uphold Georgia's ban."
Georgia's six-week abortion ban will remain on hold in the meantime, but the 11th Circuit clearly thinks the end of Roe v. Wade is nigh and is preserving its opportunity to uphold Georgia's ban after Roe falls.
Read 5 tweets
10 Sep
Trump judges (here, Amul Thapar) are openly lobbying the Supreme Court to formally overturn Roe v. Wade. opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/2…
Trump Judge Amul Thapar also adopts the anti-abortion rhetoric about pro-choice judges worshiping at the "altar of abortion," which I find extremely offensive but whatever. These guys get to say whatever they want. opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/2…
Thapar spends a full 22 pages (41-63) railing against Roe v. Wade and begging the Supreme Court to overturn it as soon as possible, condemning past justices for "dismissing our constitutional text and history" while worshiping at the "altar of abortion." opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/2…
Read 6 tweets
10 Sep
Why does it feel like all the centrist/contrarian twitter figures who spent last year complaining about judgmental "woke scolds" now spend their days policing the tone and content of every COVID tweet and scolding anyone who fails to evince sufficient sensitivity to anti-vaxxers?
These people act like Victorian-era schoolteachers desperate to impart moral lessons unto their pupils by self-righteously lecturing them about proper manners in polite society. The prissy tone, the endless scolding lectures, the absolutely certainty of their own correctness ...
It's too much! No one asked for these lectures! The scolding is out of control! Who anointed these people as the tone police of COVID twitter?! Why must I bear their priggish little sermons about how YOU don't understand anti-vaxxers the way they do? It is insufferable!!!!!!!!!!!
Read 4 tweets
2 Sep
If California outlawed handguns by allowing strangers to sue anyone who "aids and abets" their purchase, does anyone seriously believe the ultra-conservative justices (or conservative legal commentators) would shrug and say "too bad, there's absolutely nothing SCOTUS can do!"
If Oregon outlawed conversion to Christianity by allowing strangers to sue anyone who "aids and abets" a baptism, does anyone seriously believe SCOTUS wouldn't block it?
If Virginia outlawed Fox News by allowing strangers to sue anyone who "aids and abets" its broadcast, does anyone seriously believe SCOTUS wouldn't block it?
Read 7 tweets
2 Sep
BREAKING: By a 5–4 vote, with Roberts joining the liberals, the Supreme Court REFUSES to block Texas' six-week abortion ban.

Opinions here: s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentclo…
By a 5–4 vote, the Supreme Court just allowed Texas to enforce a law that prohibits abortions after six weeks, with no exception for rape or incest. Roe v. Wade is, functionally, overturned. Justice Sotomayor all but says it. s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentclo…
Sotomayor: "The Act is a breathtaking act of defiance ... The Court should not be so content to ignore its constitutional obligations to protect not only the rights of women, but also the sanctity of its precedents and of the rule of law." s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentclo…
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(