Immediately after January 6, there was a reasonable - though ultimately unconvincing, to me - case to be made for remaining somewhat skeptical towards the idea that what had happened was adequately described as an attempted “coup.” But now? Now that’s just obfuscation.
Critique of the “attempted coup” interpretation / terminology did not just come from the Right, but was particularly prevalent on the Left as well. But again, with all the information that’s come out since, it seems increasingly weird to insist that what happened doesn’t qualify.
I certainly get the general argument that we need to be specific and precise with our terms and interpretations. But what’s coming from the “Not a coup!” camp is something else: An unwillingness to acknowledge the seriousness of the events, and the danger to American democracy.
But we have to acknowledge the level of preparation that went into the attempt to block the transfer of power and seize control, the number of people involved, the support from important factions on the Right, and the fact that Republicans remain united behind Trump.
Again, it’s not just the new information about the events leading up to and including January 6 that undermines the “Not a coup, just some Trump ridiculousness” argument - it’s the fact that the American Right has united behind the idea that Democratic governance is illegitimate.
Remember: Within just a year, we went from “Would Republicans really consider blocking the certification of presidential election results?” to “Can anyone envision Republicans certifying a Democratic election win ever again?” That should terrify us!
We must face the fact that the radicalization of the Republican Party has outpaced what even most critical observers imagined, and that what was described as an unlikely worst-case scenario just a while ago has come to pass. We need to adjust our expectations going forward.
“We never grappled with the fact that this could really happen, and so it didn’t” is, unfortunately, not at all how this works. In fact, too many people and institutions clinging to the idea that “It can’t happen here!” is an important ingredient to authoritarianism’s rise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I think this is basically right. At the very least, we need to acknowledge that historically, “lowering the temperature” has almost always meant putting the breaks on - or even reversing - social and racial progress in an attempt to appease reactionary demands and sensibilities.
In that way, “lowering the temperature” has almost always come at the expense of traditionally marginalized groups and their demands for equality and respect.
Conversely, times of accelerated racial and social progress - or, more precisely: phases that were widely perceived as such by the white majority - have always been characterized by heightened political conflict and “polarization.”
This is the key lesson we should really learn from history: That things can always turn, that contingency is never to be underestimated, that we need to grapple with the vast universe of possible outcomes and the full complexity of past and present realities. Some thoughts: 1/
Yes, we absolutely can and should “learn” from history – but probably not in the way it’s often portrayed in the broader political and public discourses, and even by some historians themselves. There are very few clear-cut lessons to be had, no easy policy recommendations. 2/
Focusing on long-term structures and processes - trying to make sense of the world by exploring how it has become what it is today - necessarily changes our understanding of the present. But that’s not what is commonly meant by “learning” from history. 3/
Reading this sends cold shivers up and down my spine.
An open declaration of war on American democracy. The key question now is: Will anyone on the pro-democracy side be willing and able to muster a response that is commensurate with this threat?
Had they succeeded, American democracy would have ended right there and then. Had they just tried it, even without immediate success, chaos and a disastrous level of political violence would have been almost guaranteed to follow. This is terrifying.
What terrifies me most is the fact that the Republican Party - meaning almost all party officials as well as the majority of GOP voters - is still united behind the man responsible for this, the man who so clearly would have loved to abolish democracy on January 6.
Every “Western” society harbors far-right extremists like Greene who dream of committing acts of fascist violence. That’s not a new development. But the fact that the Republican Party embraces and elevates her constitutes an acute danger to democracy.
If what’s on display here were just the extremist nonsense of a fringe figure, it’d be best to simply ignore it. This, however, isn’t just Greene’s extremism - it is increasingly that of the Republican Party itself.
How do we know that Greene isn’t just a crazy outlier? Because the Republican Party doesn’t treat her like one. Neither her extremist views nor her open embrace of this kind of violence-affirming, fascist symbolism gets her in trouble with her GOP colleagues.
These are shocking numbers. Whether or not it’s possible to sustain democracy under the circumstances of the current information environment is one of the key questions of our era - and I’m afraid we need to acknowledge that there’s a very real chance the answer might be no.
Crucially, let’s not mistake these numbers as proof of “brainwashing”. There are limits to the rightwing propaganda machine’s power if it tries to go against the underlying anxieties that are animating conservatives. But it’s highly effective in amplifying those anxieties.
The “brainwashing” approach cannot explain why, for instance, Fox News failed in 2013 to get conservatives onboard with immigration reform. After a few weeks of trying, severe pushback from the base had them going back to demonizing any kind of immigration compromise.
The conservative reaction to the soft vaccine mandate boils down to: “So what if I might be spreading a highly contagious virus that’s killed hundreds of thousands and is devastating everybody’s lives - leave me alone!” The idea that we should all just accept that is bizarre.
We as a society accepted it for far too long, and paid far too high a price for it. It’s been obvious for many months that will have to vaccinate our way out of this pandemic, that we won’t get from a pandemic to an endemic situation unless people get vaccinated. Let’s do it!
America has prioritized the anxieties of an increasingly radicalized minority for far too long - in that way, our public health crisis and our democracy crisis have been closely intertwined, and we need to tackle both.
A more detailed version of that argument in this thread: