3/And in fact, the provisions of the Build Back Better bill mostly fall into these three categories (some of them into multiple categories).
4/But I feel like it's inevitable that both the "investment" and the "cash benefits" pieces of the Bidenomics agenda are going to get short shrift in the final version of the BBB bill.
5/Infrastructure already got moved to the bipartisan bill -- which is too small, and which progressives have tabled anyway.
Research spending got moved to the Endless Frontier Act, which got largely gutted.
As for climate investment...can it survive Manchin??
6/As for cash benefits, the big policy there is Biden's child tax allowance.
But although people have liked receiving it, they're not enthusiastic about making it permanent.
7/Americans seem mired in a "scarcity mindset" -- terrified that the person next to them is getting a few dollars they don't deserve. This makes them unwilling to embrace the kind of simple, universal programs we need.
8/If you look at which issues Americans care about, health care is at the top, with climate, infrastructure, and education all taking a back seat.
Americans are just not in the mood to reimagine our national system right now, it seems.
9/And Biden is not doing a sufficient job of persuading Americans to be bold. He's not connecting like FDR.
The "old guy manages a team of young progressives from an Olympian remove" style of management is showing its limitations.
10/Meanwhile, much of the discourse around the bill on both the left and the right focuses on the SIZE of it -- $3.5 trillion vs. $1.5 trillion etc. -- instead of what's actually IN the damn thing.
11/And like little piranhas, lobbyists are darting in to bite off important chunks of the bill -- stuff few people notice because it doesn't change the headline number that everyone is arguing about.
12/And Manchin seems like he has a good chance of succeeding in gutting the climate provisions and cash benefits -- what I consider the most transformative and important parts of the bill -- in the final deal.
13/That will leave us with a bill that throws a bunch of money (but less than people think, since these "trillions" are 10-year totals) at the already overpriced industries of health care and child care.
14/Paying for more of people's health care and child care and education is fine and good, but it's going to make those industries somewhat more overpriced and overstaffed. That's the price we pay for mass middle-class care job provision.
15/So this is why I'm underwhelmed and a bit pessimistic about this bill. It's called the Build Back Better bill, but if climate and cash benefits are gutted, what will it actually be BUILDING?
1/One reason I'm so happy about the popularity of South Korean stuff in America is that I think it'll help Americans become less provincial.
One of my big theses is that most Americans barely even realize that other countries exist, and need to get out more.
2/In this regard, the South Korean wave is very different from the Japanese entertainment products that Americans like. Those products are mostly fantasy stuff -- cartoons, comics, video games...
3/Japanese entertainment products are of course influenced by Japan, but they are filtered through several layers of fantasy and whimsy.
Americans who get into Japanese fantasy generally aren't connecting with the actual country of Japan.
Important announcement! I am taking a 6-month leave from Bloomberg Opinion in order to work on my own projects -- one of which is my Substack, Noahpinion!
Since I'll be writing exclusively there, get 1 year of Noahpinion for half price with this sale!
Idle thought: Traditionally, campaigns of conquest were used as pressure valves, to give ambitious aggressive men something to do other than overthrow the government. But China is just way too big for this, especially compared to the size of the territories it might conquer.
If ambitious Chinese men get mad at the Xi Jinping regime in the wake of its crackdowns on business, there's no way Xi can say "Here, instead of getting mad at me, go conquer Taiwan and the little bits of India, Japan, and Vietnam that we claim." Those are just too small.
I know this is cliche, but the Dems really are a grab bag of disparate special interests who throw all their policy ideas into one giant bill. This approach worked well in the New Deal because the scale of the crisis gave Dems the political capital to do many different things...
The grab-bag approach also worked in the 60s and 70s because the GOP was largely on board with the need to Do A Bunch of Stuff -- Nixon wanted to pass a bunch of programs so he could be as great as LBJ, etc.
I wish all the San Francisco people who love to cry crocodile tears as they remind us that we're living on Ohlone land would actually consider letting the Ohlone develop the land!!
A Time of Unrest produces a general political energy that causes people to go in search of causes. During this time, many small cults arise that promise to give restless people the framework, purpose, and direction they seek.
My guess is that one sign that unrest has peaked is when these cults start trying to woo each other. It suggests that their individual growth has peaked and they're looking to merge, like companies in a mature industry.