Just finished speaking for @bevismarksuk to @cityoflondon Planning Committee. Made the case that 31 Bury St will 1. Harm Tower of London World Heritage Site. Historic England agrees! 2. Harm to Bevis Marks' setting. Its eautiful courtyard will be overshadowed by the office block
3. Loss of daylight/sunlight 4. Officer's accept the scheme conflicts with the City's own policies. That harm is not outweighed by benefits are modest, generic and mainly private. The stuff about a new "village hall" in the office and sustainability credentials all looks thin.
Now just being asked to wait while city deliberates....
Troubling to hear the developer's speaker suggest that the majority of objections came from "international Jews". First its untrue. There's been a huge volume of objections from British Jews and non-Jews alike and in any case, what exactly is he getting at???
Cllr Harrower brilliant just now on hollowness of developer's public "benefits". Sticking in community space in lower floors of a 48-storey tower is a "fig leaf" to justify the harm to historic buildings. "I pity the school children who will dragged out of school to come here"
Natasha Lloyd Owen on top of her brief and v impressive in challenging the public benefits, interrogating the sustainability credentials of the office tower and explaining why in her view the modest benefits doesnt outweigh the harm to the World Heritage Site
Cllr Henry Pollard: speaks emotively and powerfully about the "immense" symbolic importance of Bevis Marks and why he will be voting to refuse. Most pleasingly he urges the City that in future it must take greater care and sensitivity about how it plans around Bevis Marks
Really good to hear Cllrs Upton + Barrow recognise the sensitivity of Bevis Marks and the impact that a 48 storey building will have taking from its sky, its light and its setting. Sounds like the City is learning some real lessons here about conservation and community relations!
A number of cllrs recognising that Bevis Marks is not just another listed building, 1 of 600 in the City, but something very very special to British Jewry
I cant believe it - we did it!!
Planning permission refused 7 votes in favour 14 against!!! Im so proud of all our team and all our supporters
Really moving to see the outpouring of support for our community on this - from Jews and non Jews alike, planners, architects, historians, Londoners - great to see!
I should say that today - whilst a big win - is not the end of it. Watch out for a developer appeal + there are more planning applications for office towers right next Bevis Marks in the pipeline - thats why your support matters so much!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread: Yesterday’s EHRC report and the robustness of its findings mark what many have rightly called a line in the sand. Do read it. 1/9
The report does not pull its punches. Read it. The EHRC’s investigation “identified serious failings in leadership” making it “hard not to conclude that AS within the Labour Party could have been tackled more effectively if the leadership had chosen to do so”. /2
I take no satisfaction in the outcome, or that the investigation had to be brought in the first place. I do feel a measure of relief after the emotionally draining and corrosive discourse of the last few years. /3
Im looking forward to seeing the leadership candidates in action tonight at the @JewishLabour hustings. After 3 horrendous yrs during which great Jewish MPs & members felt forced out of the party there are some tough qs to answer. I am supporting @Keir_Starmer, here is why 1/8:
I've known Keir for a long time, have seen his work as a dedicated local MP up close and feel very strongly he is the best candidate. He has the leadership qualities, principles and experience we need at this critical time 2/8.
Keir was one of the (too few) voices in the Shadow Cabinet that fought for a strong response to AS. He argued publicly for automatic exclusion of AS members: 3/8 theguardian.com/news/2019/jul/…