the narrative that Facebook is awful but they can be better is extremely dangerous in this moment of global movement. It leads to regulation Facebook itself promotes rather than fixing governance, core surveillance capitalism biz model and market power issues of the company. /1
"the buck stops with Mark" - Facebook whistleblower with the exact same five words we heard from Facebook's CTO when he testified to UK Parliament in 2018 although oddly a Facebook executive last week would no longer say this. /2
Senator Blackburn just said "Facebook sells the data" [to advertisers] which is likely to trigger Facebook, Inc and its comms team. Reality is the definition of "sell" matters here and Facebook and Sheryl Sandberg have made it a 3rd rail, red line talking point since 2010. /3
See? Turn back the clock over eleven years, $400 billion in advertising and about 3 billion users ago. /4
When you hear questions about engagement-based rankings and filters these are smart questions - @SenJohnThune now - and can be taken down a path of partisanship. But as you'll see this is a bipartisan concern downstream from dominant market power and abuse available due to it. /5
Note how whistleblower made point about engagement-based rankings and responsibility for them in the context of CDA230. That's a smart and necessary distinction. She points out if Facebook was liable for amplification decisions, they would eliminate engagement-based rankings. /6
and @SenatorCantwell asking question whether there may also be advertising fraud here. The whistleblower's filed SEC complaint regarding "Facebook reach" is directly relevant and - full disclosure - we've worked to unseal internal comms in a related fraud case in California. /7
It's worth noting facebook employees seem to be silent on Twitter during the hearing except for their lapdog spokesperson who wants you to know that the fact the witness didn't work directly on an issue, he thinks it undermines the evidence and her knowledge of this issue. /8
While in recess, I just did a quick cable news interview.
- this is evidence from "inside building" supporting regulatory, accountability efforts happening globally
- core issues: surveillance capitalism biz model + market power
- the company and leadership cannot be trusted /9
this is a helpful way to navigate the actual SEC complaints (ht @ScottMonty). Now that they firehosed the public with them it requires press, watchdogs to dig down deep and find time to review and report on them. I bet 95+% of it is new evidence. /10 flipboard.com/@scottmonty/8-…
We're back. Whistleblower making important point about Facebook's unprecedented growth and margins have lots of room for a bit less profit and a lot more civil society. Sheryl Sandberg showed her $ greed in 2018 scandals threatening they may have have to charge for Facebook. /11
the largest, most influential gathering of US marketers just opened its annual gathering of thousands of leading minds in advertising. I really want to know what they think of this concurrent Facebook whistleblower hearing on how FB uses their $100bil in annual investment. /12
Speaking of advertisers, every dollar they spend is an economic signal of confidence in Facebook, its leadership and its services including Instagram. They should play this exchange to their board of directors. /13
Very important point to understand…gets at why unbridled surveillance combined with microtargeting provides accelerated velocity and reach for harmful posts while suppressing “counter-speech” as users only see what will engage them but avoid positive social dynamics. /14
Super sensitive to criticizing brave whistleblower but she keeps advocating against antitrust which is weird and wrong. FB’s eroding blue app will be forced to compete without Insta and Insta is weaker without Facebook’s surveillance machines. Biggest threat to company. /15
“I am deeply concerned” - Facebook whistleblower regarding NYU academics being blocked from researching the platform in nod to @LauraEdelson2 who was blocked hours after calling Facebook re: data from January 6th matters. /16
I wish in the constant analogy of Facebook to big tobacco people would point out that tobacco causes cancer which last I checked isn’t contagious, the second hand-effects of Facebook are a lot more dangerous than second-hand smoke and cigarettes never threatened democracy. /17
Concluded. She did an incredible job. Grateful for her bravery. My only quibble is on her very specific advocacy against antitrust enforcement but she’s not running the FTC and earned her right to an opinion. She did say parents and kids need more choices so there is that. /eof

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

5 Oct
I deflected conspiracies today but now change my position. If I were Facebook and knew these eight SEC whistleblower complaints were being published today, I sure as hell would take down my own apps to distract the press.
They are deadly - way beyond what we've seen so far. /1
I'll thread them, every analyst, academic, journalist and regulator covering Facebook needs to review them and SEC needs to launch full investigation:

Facebook's role in the 2020 election and January 6 insurrection /2
drive.google.com/file/d/1WPOaPE…
Facebook's removal of hate speech /3 drive.google.com/file/d/1CZrCqy…
Read 11 tweets
5 Oct
Bam. Just now reading through 8 SEC complaints filed by Facebook Whistleblower. They're brutal, incredibly damning. My attention went to last one, "Facebook's Reach" as I'm very familiar with other parallel lawsuits. Also likely why Everson jumped ship... cbsnews.com/news/facebook-…
I see in these SEC whistleblower filings a # of connections into other civil lawsuits currently underway against Facebook. If the SEC launches an investigation and examines the entire body of evidence, including SEC's own settlement with Facebook, it will likely be very damning.
OK, I've now read two complaints. I need to crash but so far these are absolutely brutal, meticulous complaints to SEC. Facebook is toast; I can''t see how its leadership team is still in place fighting this. Let's look at "Facebook's Role in the 2020 Election and Insurrection"
Read 8 tweets
4 Oct
Here is the difference. The amended case answers all the judge’s concerns. I wouldn’t let Facebook’s lobbyplex bragging about their initial win confuse you into confidence this case is going anywhere but forward.
Here is what I said when the lawsuit was filed six weeks ago.
Back to Facebook’s response to FTC. I’ve now read the fifty pages and it’s dumb. Sorry, that my shortest twitter-friendly word for it. Dumb. To believe the case shouldn’t move forward you need to believe … /3
Read 10 tweets
4 Oct
Pretty impressive rollout by Facebook whistleblower. She has stream-rolled over efforts by Facebook to control the narrative or create doubt in the reporting and her. Here is New York Times and Washington Post. /1
The two largest finance news sites and newspapers. /2
Network news again. /3
Read 4 tweets
3 Oct
hi @AdrienneLaF, I worry enough Facebook press didn't read your cover story yet -> Facebook needs to be treated like a "hostile foreign power." They're playing directly into Facebook's PR strategic response undermining a whistleblower risking it all. /1
theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
with respect, I don't agree at all with allowing Clegg on Sunday morning shows. It is the equivalent of giving the head of PR at Brown and Williamson airtime the morning of Jeffrey Wigand's whistleblowing on 60 Minutes. If I was the whistleblower, I would be irate at this. /2
Meanwhile, another national news outlet just republished an internal memo written by Facebook PR broadly characterizing to FB employees what to expect on 60 Minutes tomorrow night. Do we not think that is exactly what Facebook wanted? Andrew Bosworth Lord of Rings memo 2.0 /3
Read 5 tweets
2 Oct
Because it’s going to get a lot worse. PR tip: 60 Minutes has a significantly larger audience (10mm+) than anything so far and will tease hearing. In addition, there are larger problems all coming at the same time. I’ll list them in no particular order:
1 - Texas lawsuit names Sandberg for possible criminal market rigging. DOJ expected to take up after new AAG expected to be confirmed this month.
2 - FTC just sued to break up their company into pieces. State AGs from every state in America are appealing to have their suit refiled.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(