I wrote about how the real human stakes of the Reconciliation Bill––from universal pre-K to dental and hearing for seniors to free community college––are being glossed over in favor of fatuous "progressive vs moderate" horse race coverage. thecolumn.substack.com/p/the-actual-h…
As a bit of an aside, my favorite trope is the multiple outlets running b-roll of money literally being printed while discussing the reconciliation bill “price tag”. Just tax-and-spend liberals firing up the old socialism money machine!
Articles about fight over reconciliation from the past 72 hrs that make vague reference to “social spending” and “climate” with no mention of what is actually in the bill

1) npr.org/2021/10/03/104…
2) newsweek.com/joe-manchin-si…
3) reuters.com/world/us/democ…
4) thehill.com/homenews/admin…
We do get 8 references to “price tags” however
Take this WaPo report. We get vague mentions of “climate, health-care & social spending” & on paragraph 26 an aside about “aid to children, students and the elderly” w/ zero sense of what specifically these plans entail. Material impact is an afterthought washingtonpost.com/politics/recon…
Polls show Americans are more skeptical of “social” and “climate” policy in the abstract but when asked about the specifics they are much likelier to support these measures. Glossing over the **substance** of what’s at stake and directing media energy to horse race sows nihilism
Politico did 1800-words on the reconciliation negotiations and beyond vague reference to "social spending" never once mention what's on the chopping block––No fixing schools, no dental for seniors, no pre-K, no medicare expansion. It's all an abstraction!
I mean Politico's whole deal is horse race but a casual mention to their readers what "moderates" seek to gut, that which will actually affect poor people's lives, would be nice. Would take a simple paragraph and perhaps provide an ounce of moral context.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam H. Johnson

Adam H. Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamjohnsonNYC

7 Oct
just completely craven. Manchin's scam for yrs has been to rarely specify what anti-poverty program he wishes gut––instead engaging in phony, vague deficit concern trolling. Sanders called him on this, asking him to be clear & now he's cowardly putting the burden on progressives
to "pick just one", thereby shifting the responsibility back on to anyone but himself. Sanders et al called his bluff, insisting he SPECIFY and commit to a (very popular) program (that polls well) he wants to dump but he's too chickenshit to do this. So this is his only play.
Manchin has the evergreen excuse that he's just in a conservative state and Has No Choice But To Vote For Big Business but he never wants to commit to opposing specific popular things. Thus the need to pick arbitrary budget numbers under the thin pretext of Deficit Conerns
Read 6 tweets
6 Oct
Every 2 years someone new just reinvents Third Way and thinks they cracked the Da Vinci Code
“What if we werent left or right but fact-based” is such a hollow, smarmy sentiment targeting a specific cohort of people who view themselves as existing outside politics, partly born from genuine failures of our political class, but mostly it’s just calculated self-help bullshit
yes! it's very popular and its why many run-of-the-mill conservatives have historically used this posture. See: Third Way, Bill O'Reilly. It's very effective and disarms people who see themselves as too hip for the right.
Read 6 tweets
2 Oct
Another brilliant Michael Tomasky hire. Glib longtime DC insider casually condemns tens of thousands of seniors to no or substandard healthcare and is boring and fucking smug about it. The 1990s are back baaayybeeee
Adam Levine’s uncle thinks guaranteed healthcare for seniors is “a great idea” that “should happen someday. But it’s really expensive” & the obvious follow up any editor would ask is “Tim, if it should happen someday, when exactly will it not be ‘expensive’? This is nonsensical”
Let’s see how many discredited Iraq war boosters we can dust off and get cushy jobs at the new old New Republic, pay them six figures to write dull, smug pro-austerity takes that no one reads. Please, more of this
Read 5 tweets
1 Oct
So many Serious Opinion havers who just hate poor people doing the inane "let's means test everything lest billionaires send their kids to Southwestern Fresno City Community College for free!" line and I'm dying inside.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Absolutely no one honestly thinks means testing programs is anything more than a mechanism of gutting and rendering politically toxic (and invariably racialized) government programs. No one actually cares about Michael Bloomberg's children applying for Medicare!
Of course Joe Biden cannot credibly counter this argument because he made the exact same argument against Medicare For All during the primaries, helping further cement a rightwing conventional wisdom. Good times.
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
what is the point of this tweet? Primary debates are very much about normative goals, obviously tactics will change based on political circumstances but broad visions are important in that they inform voters of legislative priorities and ideological instincts
Big policy goals & grand visions are how politics is morally intelligible to most people. Why would I get excited for, canvas for, tell my friends & family to vote for a candidate who preemptively starts from a bargaining position of low expectations & guesswork about feasibility
Adults understand that debating the merits of normative policy aims isn’t the same as laying out a play by play legislative strategy based on Nate Silver’s predictions as to the political conditions on Inauguration Day
Read 6 tweets
30 Sep
CNN is very clearly running paid PR for the UAE and it's hilarious to me they won't answer basic questions confirming or denying it. Anyway, remember this next time @brianstelter sanctimoniously goes on about "freedom of the press" or undue foreign influence from Russian or China
see more examples of CNN's hard hitting journalism on the UAE here. Highlights include six separate articles about how great their pools are. thecolumn.substack.com/p/cnn-wont-say…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(