1) For those who recognize the initiate code (signaling), a dispositive argument can be made that Francis’ 2000 Encyclical Fratelli Futi was a victory lap celebrating the lodges’ victory of the Alta Vendita over the Church.
2) It even signals the French Revolution just like Ratzinger, his refs to 1789, when calling for the raising of the (Church’s) Bastions, Fratelli Futi replaces Catholic theology for that of a movement formally condemned by the Church more than any other.
3) Consider, while Fratelli Futi mentions the Holy Spirit only 3 times, liberty (6), equality (15) and fraternity (55) are mentioned a combined 76 times. In fact, paragraphs 103 to 105 are bundled under a section titled “Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.”
4) In the French version, the section is titled “Liberté, égalité et fraternité.” But wait, there’s more. The next section is titled “A Universal Love that Promotes Persons” which could more recognizably be restated as “the universal brotherhood of man.”
5) This isn’t signaling, it’s a 3 Stooges-esque poke in the eye. It’s not Catholic. In fact, this view was condemned by the same encyclicals that Ratzinger said the V2 document Gaudium et Spes dialectically negated (but you have to recognize the initiate language and go with it).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A friend undertook the translated subtitles. I've been planning to put something together on this and will soon. Habermas is second generation Frankfurt School. There is reason to think that this concept was first tried in prototype at Vatican II -
2) I know what you’re thinking: “Vatican II, WT*, that’s a reach, even for you. But consider, it was well known at Vatican II that microphones were turned off for those who opposed the periti and there were other events as well that map with Habermas’ DT.
3) Then, consider that in 2005, Habermas coauthored a book with Cardinal Ratzinger titled THE DIALECTICS OF SECULARIZATION: ON REASON AND RELIGION. In the US, the Jesuit Ignatius Press published it never once suggesting that Habermas was a Marxist.
1) Not a coincidence. Why are so many on the left completely unaware of the eugenics nexus to the Fabians or that the Soviets had harsh "antiparisite" laws? The Left has never been a party of the workers, but rather of elites controlling workers - it's a "road to serfdom".
2) It's always been about the "vanguard," never the proletariat. Think of that vanguard as Thanos (death in Greek) from Marvel. Pieper's "Platonic Nightmare"? You only need enough of the hoi poloi at the bottom of the triangle to service those at the top.
3) There is nothing novel about what's going on, and the science is as old as Plato's from the Phaedo (which is NOT modern peer reviewed science). A few screen shots from "ReRemembering the MisRemembered Left" on the Fabians (or is that Fabii?).
1) As I recall, Feldman was a principal author of the Afghan Constitution. When asked to review the draft Constitution in 2005, I warned and in fact was sent to Doha, that if that Constitution was ratified, it was one that designed for the Taliban to be in charge.
There's no reason for children under 15 to be jabbed. Yes, it's the uncool position that a treatment that has yet to clear the experimental phase should not be forced on anyone. There are complications as VAERS and other clinical reporting indicates. 1/2 of C19 pts had the jab.
2) Grossly underreported are the massive protests in the EU over the "jab" (because its not a vaccine, its an experimental mRNA agent) rising in the courts arguing that one cannot have informed consent on the treatments because the information is not made available
3) Among the concerns are questions wrt the placenta in pregnant women that the long range testing may resolve - but will not conclude for at least a year. Then there is the issue with cytokine (sp) storms - esp given the off-season escalation among those jabbed.
1) BTW, dialectical processes are intensely nihilistic because Socrates (via Plato) believed one must (dialectically) negate what one knows from the sensible realm to "recollect" (αναμνησισ - anamnesis) what one knows from the time before one was born - in the perfect world.
2) The sensible world of constant change (genesis) v the unchanging realm of the eternally perfect (ousia). Opinion v Knowledge. Belief v Wisdom. Hence, one NEVER learns but simply RECOLLECTS what was known by the soul (ψυχή - soul) in the pre-born realm of the eternally perfect.
3) Also, the dialectic is intensely anti-transcendent and hence organically rejects all notions of a transcendent God. The Greek for soul ψυχή (psyche) brings with it concepts of soul that reject Christian (Jewish, etc) notions of soul in favor of the Greek.
1 0f 21) Marxism is metaphysical in its design, it makes metaphysical claims, declares metaphysics to be dead, and then imposes its metaphysical claims on the population with the demand that they be afforded the status of science.
2)(If you’re unsure about metaphysics, now would be a good time for a refresher.) Marxist claims of science are metaphys. For example, many of the “scientific” claims in support of the C19 lock-down leading to the destruction of wealth & the suspension of civil and constitutional
3) - rights were often contradictory, arbitrary, and wrong - but still imposed through the organs of state power & enforced through mass line narratives. As warned back in March 2020- unconstrainedanalytics.org/narrative-domi…