A short thread on what this would mean in practice, and why some Dem lawmakers distrust that it will happen. 🧵
If Dems use the reconciliation process to raise the debt limit, that would normally require several complicated time-consuming steps (many hours of debate, "vote-a-ramas") to get it done.
Not a lot of time is left, however.
Probably the whole process would take 2+ weeks; we may not actually have 2 weeks before Treasury runs out of cash. (There is some uncertainty about exact timing of the so-called "X-Date.")
However: Republicans *could* agree to waive or shorten some of those usual time-consuming steps in this process. They could agree to fewer hours of debate, no long drawn-out vote-a-ramas with politically difficult amendments, etc.
That's what McConnell is signaling they might do
However, Dems don't trust whether he'll keep his word. Or, whether he can keep the craziest members of his caucus from abiding by his pledge
In fact there is a risk that some unruly R's could slow things even further than that 2+ week estimate suggests.
R's could, for example, boycott the Senate Budget Comm hearing needed to amend the budget resolution -- which might effectively block resolution from getting to floor. rollcall.com/2021/09/22/pot…
I've heard people say: "I can’t believe Republicans would block this because this is exactly what McConnell is asking for."
But given levels of distrust right now between the parties, and some particularly nihilistic members of GOP, you can understand why Dems might be skeptical
Dems argue that they can avoid this whole drawn-out process (and its attendant risks) by dealing with the debt ceiling through "regular order" rather than reconciliation. That is, just voting on a bill the normal way
However
That would require either: R's agree not to filibuster the bill (which would be a reasonable compromise; D's did this in past). R's say no way.
OR: D's could eliminate filibuster in debt limit context so that R's can no longer hold the full faith and credit of U.S. hostage.
D's keep saying that duh they should just kill the filibuster! But doing so would require Manchin's consent, and he says he won't provide it. Precisely because D's can deal with this through reconciliation already, avoiding filibuster (...except for the risks explained above) ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Catherine Rampell

Catherine Rampell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @crampell

8 Oct
Would read an in-depth writeup on the well-oiled right-wing hate-click/harassment machine. In my experience/observation it goes something like this...
Some right-wing figure does a Twitter “dunk” on someone else (sometimes not actually a dunk but rather a misunderstanding, unintentional or willful, of the issue by the dunker). Then other followers pile on.
Then Fox News writes an entire news story (?) about just the tweets and replies, characterizing them as someone getting "destroyed" or whatever.
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct
Immigrants have been awarded 38%, or 40 of 104, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in chemistry, medicine and physics since 2000, per @NFAPResearch. Share going back to 1901 is 35% nfap.com/wp-content/upl… Image
This is true, the best and brightest researchers often want to come here - but we have not always let them in!
.@PMoserEcon and @san_muly have a great paper quantifying the costs to US research & innovation from the 1920s national-origins quota system for instance dropbox.com/s/005ikevo7e34…
Read 5 tweets
6 Oct
This is an excellent question, and one I haven't been able to get an answer to when talking with White House/Cap Hill Dems. I think the answer could be something like...
For months Dems underestimated GOP's genuine commitment to blocking debt limit fix thru regular order. Ds believed Rs might not vote for suspension/hike but also wouldn't filibuster - i.e., they'd do as Ds did before in a symbolic vote against limit hike
Now D’s are reacting to that disillusionment by saying ‘golly gee I guess we really can’t trust those R’s to commit to anything cooperative in advance!’ Hence Dems' recent pivot to talking about eliminating the filibuster (which Manchin opposes)
Read 5 tweets
6 Oct
So, who is actually "playing Russian roulette with [the/our] economy"? ImageImage
My view is: GOP is being actively reckless, deliberately blocking a debt limit increase/suspension; Dems have mostly been naive, and too slow to recognize they needed to act on their own
Best way to prevent *anyone* from playing Russian roulette, in any case, is take away the gun
However this is resolved in near-term -- and I genuinely don't know how, given political and time constraints obstructing every pathway out of this -- I hope the conclusion Congress reaches is: get rid of the debt limit once and for all.
Read 4 tweets
5 Oct
Dems are reluctant to lift debt limit on their own, thru reconciliation, b/c they don't want to (1) raise it to a specific number (as opposed to suspending it altogether for a period of time) or (2) do that on their own
They worry the # would appear in misleading GOP attack ads
But even without a specific new debt limit # to play up - R's will STILL call D's big spenders.
So fears about painful optics of a party-line vote for a specific debt limit # always seemed overblown to me, especially relative to the *actual* pain that would be caused by default.
Apparently even Manchin -- who among all D lawmakers is probably most sensitive to accusations of running up deficits -- thinks this political-optics worry is overblown too
Read 5 tweets
5 Oct
School boards are asking for federal help as they face threats and violence npr.org/sections/back-…
Unhinged, violent mobs have come for local public officials who work on elections; public health; courts; and now, school boards.
It has long been difficult to recruit good, talented people to become civil servants. I fear current trends may soon make it impossible
Not unrelated: "Once lauded as heroes, health care workers are now spit on and ‘threatened every day at work.’
Some doctors and nurses wear panic buttons because of violent patients" michiganadvance.com/2021/10/05/onc…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(