As @BorisJohnson keeps digging on “high skill, high wage”, with an approach closer to East German communism than Californian capitalism, let’s look at who did well, how the UK did, & what we can learn.
Spoiler: Mr Johnson urgently needs to reconsider his failed Brexit.
A 🧵 /1.
What matters to people is what their wages can buy. And whether they’re being treated fairly.
Let’s look at the Federal Republic of Germany (“West Germany” until 1990) & the UK. With the USA as global benchmark. /2.
So, how’s that been going?
The attached chart of GDP per capita, adjusted for purchasing power & inflation, shows Germany
overtook the UK in the 1970s. They tracked each other through the era of UK EEC/EU membership for about 35 years. Until something happened. /3.
After the 2007/8 financial crash the UK was left badly behind.
The £ crashed from about €1.50 to about €1.10.
It recovered some of that ground then crashed again after David Cameron announced the EU referendum in November 2015. And after the June 2016 referendum itself. /4.
The UK has been failing relative to Germany, since the financial crash. And since the EU referendum announcement.
Germany’s success - it also tracked the USA well, while the UK fell away - happened in the EU.
As did the UK’s performance from the early 1970s to the crash. /5.
What about fairness?
UK inequality increased sharply under Thatcher/Major, dropped with Blair/Brown & increased again under Cameron etc.
Germany has had consistently lower, & more or less steady, inequality.
US inequality is consistently higher (much higher than Germany). /6.
There’s much talk about “cheap EU labour” reducing UK pay. Obviously, Germans can’t be meant - although 0.3 million Germans were resident in the UK in 2019. Perhaps the 0.8 million resident Poles? But look at what’s happened to per capita GDP in Poland compared to the UK. /7.
The EU cheap labour story is flaky. (And note: for the few years before the crash, UK per capita GDP still rose with Germany, yet Poland etc already had UK freedom of movement).
There’s a more obvious story. Failed post-crash economic policy. And a disastrous EU referendum. /8.
Perhaps you don’t like that story …
What’s undeniable is that Germany has outperformed the UK for over 70 years.
It’s done so while being in the EEC/EU for 65 years.
It’s a consistently richer, fairer society than the UK. /9.
The UK did well in the EEC for decades.
Individual greed doesn’t seem to have been the secret. UK inequality has fluctuated: it’s been consistently higher than in the more successful German economy. (And notably higher under the Conservatives than Labour). /10.
In short, Germany’s experience contains important lessons for the UK.
Unless you’re the USA, the global hyperpower (& perhaps even if you are):
▪️greed isn’t good
▪️the EU is
▪️go figure /11. End
Erich Ernst Paul Honecker (*25 August 1912 in Neunkirchen (Saar); †29 May 1994 in Santiago de Chile) was a German communist politician who rose to be head of the GDR state council. Through his adherence to relentless, self-interested … /1.
… ideology & associated incompetence he destroyed his country and caused incalculable harm to its people. Once everything collapsed in ignominy he was arrested & banished. West Germany invested hugely to try to repair the disaster. /2.
Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson (/ˈfɛfəl/ *19 June 1964, New York City) is an ex English nationalist politician who rose to be Prime Minister of the (former) United Kingdom. Through his adherence to relentless, self-interested …/3.
“High skill, high wage” & state “transition” - a history in six tweets
In 1977 Erich Honecker, still trying to build back better after 30 years, issued a labour code for East Germany.
Rules for a high skill, high wage, low immigration, innovative, centrally planned economy. /1.
1977 being the 60th anniversary of the October Revolution, Leonid Brezhnev gave a speech.
The USSR & its allies were in transition. The struggling “actually existing socialism” so far achieved was only a step on the way to true communism. A further 60 years would be needed. /2.
Of course, Honecker & Brezhnev also ran low emigration policies, severely restricting their citizens’ freedom movement.
The “anti-fascist protection wall” was there, they emphasised, to protect patriotic workers against foreigners.
The torrent of whining self-pity, conspiracist “anti-globalism” (hmm, who could be meant?) & reality denial, as the chaotic project shreds a once influential, respected country, often distracts from a core Brexiter motivation. Destruction. Of the EU. And much else. A short 🧵./1.
The UK hasn’t yet been totally wrecked. Hooray! Brexit’s a triumph. Straw-men rule the world.
But the evil EUSSR Empire which oppressed the world for so long, must be destroyed. Then, the independent cantons of UK-Slavia will truly be free & sovereign.
Let’s look at that. /2.
Suppose 🇪🇺 contracted to the original six 🇫🇷 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇧🇪 🇱🇺
It won’t win them power. If it did, it’d destroy them in office.
@AngelaRayner’s closer to the mark, but not much, with her attacks. Here’s why. A 🧵 /1.
“Fiscal responsibility” is code for limiting government spending to the amount collected in tax. Perhaps supplemented by a small, strictly limited percentage of government bond sales aka “borrowing”. /2.
The assumption’s that anything else would cause (a) inflation, (b) excessive interest costs/ inter-generational burden to “pay back the debt”. Both assumptions are false. There’s a third assumption among some: they know (a) & (b) are false, but think voters won’t understand. /3.
You know you can’t have world-beating training in businesses, because of “cheap labour” sloshing around the single market. Right?
So to fix that you must leave the EU?
And well-paid, skilled jobs are therefore a Brexit benefit?
You can. You don’t. They aren’t.
A short 🧵 /1.
Since 1969 the Federal Republic of Germany has operated a highly successful system, which brings business & government together to produce top class training, in a major, dynamic, market economy. Since the early 90s, in the EU Single Market, with the four freedoms. /2.
The four freedoms? To recap: the free movement of goods, services, people & capital. /3.