Oooo boy
As an ex-evangelical, I really, really don’t
I have, I think, in my whole entire life, never personally known even one person who seemed to be “transformed” by faith in the way Christianity promises
In the church, I knew a lot of people who claimed they had been so transformed — at some point in the past, before I knew them. I had to take their word for it. But I never SAW it happen.
The MOST charitable spin I can put on it, is that Christianity can FEEL transformative to the Christian, but it’s frequently an entirely subjective experience, with no meaningful effect on behavior or demeanor, unless —
It’s to the negative. I have, sometimes, known people, usually already Christian, who got more heavily into their faith and changed — becoming weird, single-minded, and humorless.
And, listen — not that I expect any religious dudes on the Internet to ever listen to me — if you want “the world” to see Christianity as transformative in a positive way, you really ought to change the focus of your teachings & doctrine.
All major strains of modern Christianity mainly focus on 1. The kind of sex you’re not supposed to have, 2. The kind of sex OTHER PEOPLE aren’t supposed to have 3. What happens after you die
You know, you can SAY “we’re not just the world’s most obnoxious anti-sex scolds, there’s so much more to Christianity!” But my dudes, you have to LIVE that for it to be true.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's really started to get up my nose to see white Christians rhetorically contrasting themselves with "the world" in a majority Christian country where white Christians hold most of the power.
I grew up with that language, of course, but even as a trusting baby evangelical I could see it was ridiculous. In what way were Christians not "worldly"? They bought property, they went to the mall and Disneyland, they watched television --
Hell, Christians were ON television & making themselves filthy rich there, does it get more worldly than that?
One crucial and very weird aspect of it, is that it is a distinct change that happened to the church within my lifetime. When I was a kid in the 1970s our church celebrated Halloween just like other people but by the 1990s, after I left, it was a “harvest carnival”
It wasn’t the same church, but it was representative of what had happened in the west coast evangelical mainstream. Regular evangelicals like the ones in my family had changed their views & had a lot more concerns about direct satanic influence, spiritual warfare, etc.
I woke up with another couple thoughts on the notion of Christianity as “transformative” possibly based on seeing Jesus Christ Superstar in Seattle last night
Background: When the JCS movie came on TV we watched it as a family, and I remember having the general impression that it was “controversial” and that my family were the “rebellious” evangelicals because we were watching it.
My parents made a point of talking about places where the JCS story differs obviously from evangelical orthodoxy, most notably: no resurrection. They would also say “well, in the text it’s like this, they took a few liberties…”
This article lays out what I've started to suspect is the only possible *practical* reason for why Republican elites are against anti-disease measures: because they perceive that ending the pandemic would benefit Biden politically.
So their idea is to keep coronavirus infections, deaths, and general chaos as high as possible because they think this will hurt Biden, and Democrats in general, in a political way.
But also, DAMN, I thought I was cynical about Republican evil, but apparently I can never be cynical ENOUGH to really anticipate how straight-up evil they are.
This reminds me of something I’ve been thinking about ever since my person run-in with the fetus cultists on Northgate Way: how to respond to them better.
How to shut them down, deflect them, keep them from harming people, neutralize their message, etc. — without melting down into sputtering rage, like MTG’s opponent does here. It’s obvious one of them is performing and one is genuinely angry. But —
The person who is GENUINELY angry is at a disadvantage. You get flooded with adrenaline, your fight instinct is engaged, you want to rip her fool head off, not make a coherent argument in response.
People will fight so hard just to hang onto a false narrative, it’s really something. The false story becomes more important to them than their own lives & the lives of their loved ones.
It’s a phenomenon we’re used to, sort of, in fringe cults like Jonestown, but it’s shocking to see it in something as huge and widespread as this.