🔹 How do we use cryptocurrency to financially incentivize a group of independent entities to work together? 🤔
🔹 Not just about work done, but to have financial incentives that are high enough to avoid various types of attacks
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle Explicit incentives are direct incentives for the service provided by the miners/validators ⛏️
🔹 Users pay a fee to get their transactions processed
🔹 Revenue of miners/validators is tied to the success of the network
🔹 Have financial resources at stake/locked up 🔒
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle Implicit incentives are indirect incentives that are derived from the network and services but are not necessarily defined by the network itself
🔹 People taking on debt to purchase equipment in order to provide services
🔹 Pay back debt by earning revenue in the network
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle 🔹 E.g. people need ASICs to mine $BTC
🔹 Participants in a network have ongoing financial exposure to the token they are holding (current holdings + future income)
🔹 If they corrupt the network, they corrupt both their current holdings + future income 😰
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle 🔹 Some networks get users to lock up their tokens 🔒
🔹 A lot of network participants are public businesses, ASIC manufacturers, mining pools, and staking pools. If they are malicious, they can come under regulation through fines and their entire business is affected
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle "So essentially, there's a strong incentive to not devalue the token, because you're going to devalue both your revenue, both the tokens you hold and the hardware you have, which actually generates those tokens." - ChainLinkGod
🔹 Each network has a different hashing algorithm
🔹 Some require specialized hardware like ASICs while others use more generalized infrastructure such as graphics cards or cloud servers
🔹 Easier to resell graphics cards compared to ASICs
🔹 Miners provide computing power in return for $BTC
🔹 Block rewards are adjusted based on the hash power
🔹 The miner who is the successful block producer also gets the transaction fees of that block
🔹 Bitcoin does not have an inflationary supply
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle 🔹 Eventually, the block rewards will run out and miners will be compensated only with transaction fees
🔹 Unless $BTC price skyrockets, the Bitcoin community has to consider how to keep the security budget large enough to ensure that the network is secure
🔹 Need people to pay ⬆️ transaction fees. Else miners will leave, leading to the centralization of $BTC
🔹 Current narrative: $BTC as a settlement layer. Everything else occurs on Lightning Network. CLG does not see this happening soon
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle 🔹 CLG: People don't understand exponential decay. In 20 years, $BTC block rewards will drop by 90% 🚨
🔹 Bitcoin community needs to know what to do in the next few decades, not the next 100 years 🚨
🔹 Difficult to pull off an attack
🔹 Malicious miner could fork the network. Honest miners could deem it illegitimate
🔹 Attacker would have wasted their resources trying to attack the network
🔹 Currently very similar to $BTC
🔹 Will be moving towards Proof of Stake in Eth 2
🔹 Last month, 50% of the miner income came from transaction fees rather than the block subsidy
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle 🔹 $ETH is not just generating cryptoeconomic security around its tokens, but its applications as well
🔹 For Proof of Work, miners need to constantly sell to cover their costs. In Proof of Stake, there is no such cost. This leads to lower selling pressure and a higher ETH price
🔹 In Eth 2, validators lock up 32 ETH to gain the right to propose & validate blocks
🔹 Enter a queue process in order to enter or exit as a validator
🔹 The ⬆️ the price of ETH, the more secure the network becomes
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle 🔹 EIP-1559 introduces another form of cryptoeconomic security
🔹 It replaces the current auction model with a base fee
🔹 Base fee is burnt 🔥, while tip goes to miners
🔹 Combined with Proof of Stake, lowers issuance and makes $ETH deflationary
🔹 Random function used to select a node to become a proposer
🔹 Other nodes serve as validators
🔹 Proof of Stake is energy efficient
🔹 Cryptoeconomic security comes from malicious validators getting their stake slashed
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle 🔹 The ⬆️ nodes are malicious, the ⬆️ the slashed stake becomes
🔹 This is to incentivize decentralization
🔹 If everyone runs their node on AWS (Amazon Web Services) and AWS goes down, the penalty will be much larger than using one's own hardware and the hardware goes down
🔹 In Proof of Stake, everyone earns the same percentage yield regardless of their stake 👍👍
🔹 In Proof of Work, a larger node will have a higher yield than a smaller node because of fixed costs, infrastructure, and hardware
🔹 Proof of Stake does not increase transaction throughput at all
🔹 Eth 2 will provide data shards that can only hold data
🔹 Layer 2 rollups will continuously consume the main Ethereum blockspace
🔹 Will increase demand for layer 1 👀
🔹 Want sound money with predictable issuance ➡️ $BTC
🔹 Want security guarantees of holding assets using apps ➡️ $ETH
🔹 With cross-chain solutions like @renprotocol, people can bring $BTC to $ETH to experience the best of both worlds 😎
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle@renprotocol 🔹 If more $BTC ➡️ $ETH, $BTC miners do not accrue fees for transactions on other blockchains
🔹 When push comes to shove, the Bitcoin community will implement things to ensure the survival of Bitcoin as they have major financial incentives to see it succeed
🔹 Ability for miners to include, exclude, or reorder transactions within a block
🔹 Allows them to front-run or censor transactions to extract value from the transactions of others
🔹 MEV =/= cryptoeconomic security
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle@renprotocol 🔹 Flashbots and MEV auctions help prevent gas price auction wars, but they don't solve MEV
🔹 @chainlink Fair Sequencing Services (FSS) aims to mitigate MEV at the application level and layer 2
⛓️ Blockchain operates as a single unified network, providing the same standard of service
⛓️ Chainlink is a heterogeneous network. Millions of independent Oracle networks can run in parallel, each having their own cryptoeconomic security
@ChainLinkGod@Crypto___Oracle@chainlink ⛓️ Chainlink provides consensus about the subjective external world 🌍
⛓️ Chainlink Oracle networks are highly customizable
1️⃣ Different data types
2️⃣ Some have a couple of sources vs others which have a lot of sources
3️⃣ Some may be paid APIs while others are publicly available
Here's the pod summary from @coingecko podcast where the host Benjamin (@NeBB399) interviewed Brandon Millman (@BChillman), CEO of @phantom. Phantom wallet is a user-first crypto wallet based in the Solana blockchain. Read on 👇 to learn why Phantom is so popular with users.
🔸 CEO and co-founder of Phantom Wallet
🔸 Launched around Apr 2021
🔸 Formally an engineering leader at @0xProject
🔸 Before that, he was the senior engineer at Twitter
🔸 Disillusioned with his work at big tech companies
🔸 Decided to join a nascent 👶 industry, like Ethereum
🔸 Initially wanted to get into the consumer app side but realised infrastructure is not ready to support it, and ended up at 0x
Join us as we share the pod summary from @gabrielhaines featuring Andrew Thurman. @Blockanalia worked for Chainlink before becoming a journalist at Cointelegraph and CoinDesk. Read on more as he shares what life is like as a crypto-journalist.
🔸 Masters in Creative Nonfiction, also taught journalism
🔸 Starting investing in 2017 top
🔸 Started a business on @chainlink ecosystem, building the framework to allow node operators to work efficiently with data providers on a data call billing model
@gabrielhaines@Blockanalia@chainlink 🔸 Chainlink invited them to present at Web3 in Berlin in 2019
🔸 Co-founded a smart contract data marketplace which becomes the Oracle Network API3
🔸 One of his first calls was with @bobbyong from @coingecko
Seeing a lot of new people doing summaries now. I wonder whether we are the only one questioning some things we observed:
Q1) What is the value of summarising an article that can be read in less than 5 min?
Are we indulging on the laziness of content consumers and encouraging a habit of being able to read short form content like twitter only? Is that good for the community?
2) Are we summarising when we shouldn't? We are guilty of this too.
Why don't we see anyone summarising a poem? Or the results of a sports event? Because some things have to be experienced in its entirety, otherwise the full context is lost.
The Game On! Summit 2021 is a virtual conference celebrating the essence of Gaming 🎮, Art 🎨, Music 🎵 and Entertainment (GAME) industries. Join Allison Nam as she moderates a panel of blockchain gaming founders on their gaming careers here 👇
🔹 Sarah - COO of Gala Games @ForTheBux
🔹 Bozena - CEO and Co-Founder of GAMEE @anestetica
🔹 Jesse - Co-Founder and COO of Pixelcraft Studios/Aavegotchi @gldnXross
🔹 Leslie - Co-Founder of Dreams Quest @lesliedanchan
🔹 Has been an entrepreneur throughout her life
🔹 When the opportunity for @GoGalaGames came along, it caught her eye as they were doing something very revolutionary
🔹 Their first game, @TownStarGame, has been live for over a year now
Join us today as we share the pod summary of @BanklessHQ, where the hosts @TrustlessState and @RyanSAdams interview @AriannaSimpson from @a16z. She specialises in crypto gaming and will be sharing her thoughts on the crypto gaming space. Read on below 👇
🔸 General partner from a16z
🔸 Founded Autonomous Partners before that
🔸 Recently named in Fortune's 40 under 40
@BanklessHQ@TrustlessState@RyanSAdams@AriannaSimpson@a16z 🔸 We figured she's a voracious reader too
🔸 Hence the trading card depicts her as Belle, from Beauty and the Beast
🔸 In the podcast, she recommends Masters of Doom by @davidkushner
🔸 This is the book that inspires the quote in the trading card