A key lesson from the #PandoraPapers is that "tax haven" is a gross misnomer. In reality, the distant, finance-blighted treasure islands are not where the dirty money ends up - of course not, there's nothing to buy there.
1/
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
The "offshore" sector is like a pinball flipper - plutes and crooks bounce their money off of these tiny, out-of-the-way places, and they fire it back across the ocean, typically through an "onshore-offshore" secrecy haven.
In the USA, there are several states that compete to be the intermediate resting place these secret fortunes: Delaware, the granddaddy of them all, has been surpassed by Wyoming, Nevada, and, most recently and ferociously, South Dakota.
4/
In the EU, onshore-offshore nations like Cyprus, Malta and Luxembourg bend over backwards to launder great, ugly fortunes into the rich world, where they can acquire real-estate, yachts, supercars, and large stakes in voracious private equity firms.
5/
But when it comes to onshore-offshore, no one can hold a candle to the UK. It's not just its globe-spanning commonwealth of treasure islands, nor the close-to-hand Channel Islands.
6/
It doesn't even stop with the notorious crime-zone euphemistically called "The City" - a square mile so filled with scum and villainy that it had to annex Canary Wharf to make room for more.
7/
You also find it in Scotland. The Scottish Limited Partnership is the UK's most favored "financial secrecy vehicle," a friendly home for the former USSR's most brutal dictators, gangsters and oligarchs, who laundered over $100b through SLPs.
Today, SLPs remain a favored vehicle for laundering the world's dirtiest criminal money, like a Ukrainian crime gang that defrauded Europeans of eur10m/month.
They were able to do so because they were able to violate the SLP compliance rules - and they were able to do THAT because no one is enforcing those rules, allowing them to dissolve and reform numbered, anonymous companies to avoid scrutiny.
12/
It turns out that if you do nothing meaningful to end financial crimes, and instead just put on a pantomime about ending financial crimes, criminal will not cooperating with the pantomime, and will continue to commit crimes.
eof/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @Facebook whistleblower's testimony was refreshing and frightening by turns, revealing the company's awful internal culture, where product design decisions that benefited its users were sidelined if they were bad for its shareholders.
1/
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
The big question now is, what do we do about it? The whistleblower, Frances Haugen rejected the idea that Facebook's power should be diminished; rather, she argued that it should be harnessed - put under the supervision of a new digital regulator.
3/