Here is a thing that happens on Twitter: every time there is a labor action, strike, or boycott, someone posts about how they would love to want to help out the workers but they just happen to rely on the service provided by the target of the action and therefore they cannot.
It is therefore, they inevitably argue, not just unfair to ask them to participate in the action/strike/boycott, but actually *ableist*. (This is the most common claim, anyway, but it can be adapted to racist, misogynist, transphobic, etc., etc.)
Now, there *might* be something to this. The first problem is, though, it misses the point of a strike. A strike is supposed to inconvenience people! It's supposed to make their lives hard! That's the whole point! Otherwise, it's an empty gesture, because it can be ignored!
The second problem is, if you are reliant on the goods or services provided by a single corporation, that is *also* a problem of capitalism! It shouldn't be that way! And how do you fix that problem? With mass movements, like strikes, labor actions, and boycotts.
However, these objections are largely irrelevant, because the ableist arguments are inevitably between 99% and 99.99% complete bullshit. Whether they're idiots or just right-wing tools, the arguments these people making aren't just misguided, they're actually completely made up!
Let's look at one that showed up yesterday, concerning the Kellogg strike. 
Total bullshit! First of all, there is no food allergy or sensitivity in the world where you can *only eat Frosted Mini-Wheats*. That's made up! It's a lie! You would die of malnutrition! No one on Earth has this alleged food sensitivity!
Second, even if it weren't a lie, which it is, you could get around it by just eating a version of the product made by a different company. This is the most consumerist country of all time! There are probably dozens of versions of Frosted Mini-Wheats not made by Kellogg!
Finally, the poster says FMWs are "one of" the only foods they can eat, meaning "not the only food they can eat". So eat one of the other ones until the strike is over! Why did you even open your fucking mouth?
Here's another.
Bullshit! Total bullshit! Total bullshit lie! First all, there are literally dozens of home delivery services for food. Second, Instacart marks their shit up like crazy! It's expensive as hell! Nobody poor enough to live in a food desert can afford Instacart!
If you're poor and you live somewhere with no good grocery stores, you don't order an expensive delivery service! You just go to the shitty corner store or the Walmart or whatever. You know how I know that? Because that's been me, a bunch of times! BULLSHIT LIE!
Another one was the response to a call to boycott HelloFresh, claiming it was "ableist" because disabled people can't prep their own food. Lie! Total bullshit lie! These people don't even understand the thing they're lying about!
If they did, they would know that *HelloFresh also does not prep the food they send you*! They portion it, but you still have to prep it (as well as bring the box into your home, etc.). And even if they did, there are, again, dozens of competing home food delivery options.
All kinds of similar claims also fall apart under the most cursory examination, including people who claim it's ableist to ask for an Amazon boycott because they rely on this or that consumer good, item, or service that *only* Amazon sells and which they *have* to have overnight.
There's also the people who *have* to use Uber, because wherever they live has no Lyft, taxis, buses, shuttles, private cars, trains, public transit, private transportation through charities, friends, relatives, church services, medical transport, etc., etc.
It's never answered why they have money to use what are, generally speaking, extremely expensive private services on a daily basis. It's also never answered what they did before all of these companies existed, as many of them are less than a decade old.
It's always that they happen to be in a unique situation that forces them to forsake every other possible option and instead use the one huge corporate giant that people are desperately trying to stop from committing one fraud, abuse, or worker mistreatment or another.
It's never them who's doing something wrong; and it's *certainly* not the company who's doing something wrong. It's *you* who's doing something wrong by daring to ask that the world be improved slightly.
In conclusion, this is just another example of America's combination of consumerism and individualism, disguising its profound selfishness as innocent need and disguising any attempt at checking capitalism's power as bigotry.
Also, please consider that thinking a specific person is lying about a disability is not the same as being ableist, or thinking the disability does not exist. People lie about things, and a lot of times they lie using the language of social justice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
