We absolutely cannot allow the media to do to this Senate Judiciary Committee Report on trump’s Pressuring the DOJ to OVERTURN THE ELECTION, what they did to the Mueller report and Volume 5. These things are all connected and the context matters. 🧵👇🏻
The pieces are coming together. Jeffrey Bossert Clark (not in a position of leadership at DOJ) was making a proposal to the President of the United States, without the knowledge of his bosses, to send a letter to ‘relevant’ states 🗣to aid him in OVERTURNING THE ELECTION!!
The letter was not signed by then Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen so it was never sent to the states. The scheme was for the DOJ to tell the states they thought there were irregularities that should be reviewed. Just because they felt like there might have been fraud.
They were also trying to snow the courts. Think of it, if DOJ brings a suit against a state because it ‘feels’ there was election fraud, the next step after Clark’s letter would have been to provide evidence.
The court would no doubt have ultimately received Clark’s letter through discovery in any case that arose from the scheme. Unless of course the plan was to hide this letter which itself would have been a crime. Defying subpoenas, deceiving the court, the GOP is ok with this?
Clark’s ‘proof of concept’ was to recommend to the ‘relevant’ states to convene state legislatures to consider naming their own election winner and submitting new slate of electors. Ones that would just say Trump won, presumably.
Remember point 2 of John Eastman’s 6 point plan? It was for Pence to get to Arizona and announce he had multiple slates of electors. The Clark Letter would have set up point 2 in Eastman’s 6 POINT PLAN TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT!
I’m only on page 7 of 394 and I am already 9 kinds of furious. trump used Clark to try to extort the DOJ leadership into doing his bidding. This is the DOJ being run like a mob. Remember when the focus of the DOJ was eliminating the mob? This is insane. The rot is deep.
If Rosen signed Clarke’s letter, Clarke would refuse trump’s offer to be the Acting Attorney General. The Acting AG was Rosen. Clark was telling Rosen, ‘that’s a nice AG position you got there, it would be a shame if anything happened to it.’
In response, Rosen, Donoghue and Steven Engle from OLC decided to tell trump in the Oval, they would all quit if he went through with this scheme. Notice Clark wasn’t in that meeting.
The Committee finds that the DOJ eroded its own rules regarding investigations about election fraud. This was done under Bill Barr. The committee calls this an ‘overt act’. I hope they used that language with intent to charge.
Election fraud? ASOG? The Committee found the report was written by Russell Ramsland?
You member…👇🏻(seriously, read the embedded thread 👇🏻)
Page 23 - I’ll be honest, I did not know about the voting machines, talking to the thermostats, which speak to China. Gone are the days of thermostats in Fahrenheit and Celsius, we’ve ushered in a new wave of Mandarin and Cantonese. Was there a vote on this?
Did the thermostats also speak Italian? And does this say changing votes? That sounds awfully hammer and scorecardy 🤔
It is going to take a while to get through all 394 pages, but seeing CNN’s Jake Tapper ask Sen Durbin if anything trump did in this report was ‘illegal’ loses the forest, the trees, the saplings, and the stumps.
The mendacity of Chuck Grassley is astounding! He wants us to believe the president was listening to his advisors. He was the Senate Pro Tempore. He was in point 1 of Eastman’s 6 POINT PLAN TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT. Grassley knew the plan too. This is an active insurrection.
The president and the DOJ are supposed to be walled off from each other so as to prevent these kinds of shenanigans. Then to normalize the Republicans response by saying ‘he was just listening to advisors’ obfuscates trump from any responsibility.
How many times will he be let off the hook? When will there be accountability? His defense was my aides were discussing it, I didn’t do it. Yes he did, and his is doing it still. The media has either not figured out how to deal with this or they want this.
Oh no…nope…I’m out, that’s enough for today. Honestly, is anyone surprised by this? Seriously?
The Subverting Justice report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee shows a scheme by former president trump to use the Department of Justice 🗣 to OVERTURN THE 2020 ELECTION. It reveals a lot more than that if we care to look. Here is a wee meaningless thread🧵👇🏻
Some may argue the first impeachment of trump for his quid pro quo with Ukraine on a not perfect phone call was meaningless because the Senate had no intention of convicting their golden goose that laid federal judges and tax breaks for donors.
Some may say that impeaching trump for a second time for inciting an Insurrection was meaningless. He was out of office during the Senate trial. Ted Cruz, a sitting juror in the impeachment, was seen providing aid to trump’s lawyers. It was a sham.
Sen Kyrsten Sinema’s objectively hypocritical approach seems very Republicany. Why? When she was shoulder to shoulder with John Cornyn, I began to worry she was a plant so I took a wee look.
Sinema was the lead sponsor of a bill called S1967, the “Childcare Expansion for Military Families Act of 2021”. Her bill provides construction of child development centers. But she won’t support the Build Back Better Act which provides universal pre-k and other child provisions?
Sec 3 of Sinema’s Bill reads: ‘Education and Infant And Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Services for Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health’, but she doesn’t support the Build Back Better Act that would expand healthcare to children?
It’s time for us to wake up, everybody. The alarm has gone off a few times. We’ve hit the snooze button maybe once too many. It’s cold water in the face time. The 6 point plan John Eastman put together to overthrow the government, was A 6 POINT PLAN TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT!
If you think that there were only 6 points to this plan, good morning, I hope you slept well. No matter how big you think it is, double it. Now triple that. This story is bigger than you know and more frightening than your scariest nightmare.
The @January6thCmte is going back to April 2020 with their requests. Their request letter has a ton of names on it you haven’t heard about, names you have, and those that you need to know but who aren’t listed. One such name is Russell Ramsland.
I know you remember the crazy Kraken press conference given by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell wherein Rudy’s hair ran down his jowls. But do you remember the details? The trump campaign knew these things to be untrue when the lawyers said them. nytimes.com/2021/09/21/us/…
In the thread above, you’ll see that Sidney Powell referenced vote %s being taken by an algorithm from trump to Biden. What was she talking about? Hammer and Score card, that’s what. It is coming together, folks.
Let’s think this through, everyone. If Powell and Giuliani were aware what they were saying was not true, then everything they said in that presser is suspect. Including Powells mention of vote tally changes.
John Eastman mapped out a 6 point (📌1) path for VP Pence to take to overturn the election, defy the will of the people and overthrow the government. Let’s remind ourselves of where John Eastman was on January 6th. And who he was with. 🧵👇🏻
Rudy Colludy, who was seen exiting the Willard hotel the morning of the 6th while Roger Stone was being protected by Oathkeepers who later in the day would storm the Capitol in a golf cart provided by Cindy Chafian.
Which member of the main stream news media will be first to say the word ‘Praetorian’? If someone would methodically report on the names of those listed in the @January6thCmte letters, stories like the ones below could be told. 👇🏻 👇🏻 @maddow@JoyAnnReid@CNN@MSNBC@NBCNews
The @January6thCmte letters provide insight into who and what they are looking for. Robert Patrick Lewis’ name appears on that list. Reporters, you can tell us why.
Just pick a name on the @January6thCmte request for information letter and tell us a news story about why they might be included. A name like Mike Flynn for instance.