Some discussions in the press about how charge/summons rates vary by police force area.
Here I've prepared some charts to look at rape and other sexual offences, for the 3 years from 2018/19 to 2020/21 (inclusive).
First, rape charge rates.
1/
A very wide range of charge rates (as at July 2021: these data are periodically refreshed).
Durham are in a league of their own, with a 7.1% charge rate. Wilts, Kent, A&S and GMP all under 2%. Met Police on 2.3%. #crimestats
2/
Here's the same data with the 3 years separated out.
Note that rape offences that reach a charge typically take a long time to investigate, so those reported in 2018/19 have had longer to reach a conclusion, and not all rapes recorded over the 3 years are finalised yet.
3/
Note that I've not accounted for crimes that have 'not yet been assigned an outcome' in this analysis (they are still counted in the denominator), and the charge rates will increase as more time passes.
4/
I wondered if the rate of rapes (per 100k population) recorded by the police might be a factor, thinking lower rates might equate to more time to investigate each allegation.
In fact, there is no correlation at all.
5/
Finally, I also looked at the 3-year charge rate for other sexual offences (ie all sexual offences except rape). A somewhat different picture, though Wilts and especially Kent still way down on the rest.
The offence mix could be a factor, as could varying charging practices.
6/
The source for the data: Home Office Crime Outcomes in England and Wales Open Data, as at July 2021 (the most recent available as of today). gov.uk/government/sta…
7/
As with most things I've posted on here in recent years, I've done this analysis in my own time. If you'd like to support my work, you can help by buying me a coffee ko-fi.com/gmhales.
Thank you.
Here's the Telegraph piece from yesterday, which singles out the Met and Lancs. I think it unhelpfully conflates violent and sexual offences. telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/10/0…
For comparative purposes, here is the charge/summons rate by force for violence with injury offences. The Met are above average. I'm not sure that fits with the Telegraph portrayal of it being "the worst force in England and Wales for solving sexual and violent crime".
If you want to see the full breakdown of crime outcomes for rapes across 2018/19 to 20/21, here it is (ranked by % charged/summons).
I've picked out the % 'not yet assigned an outcome' in pink: 5 forces over 25%, Wilts 42%.
Since a number of people have suggested that regional CPS practices may be important, here's the force rape charge rates colour coded by CPS area
It's interesting, for example, to note the Durham/Northumbria/Cleveland group towards the top, and the Sussex/Surrey/Kent group towards the bottom. A fairly mixed picture overall.
I've now grouped the police force rape charge/summons rate data by CPS region.
I had a look at #schoolexclusions data the other day, and since then received a breakdown with sex and FSM eligibility as well as ethnicity - this time for all state schools (not just secondary) across 4 years.
In this thread I'll present various ways of looking at the data. 🧵
The main question I'll be examining is how rates of exclusion compare between white and black pupils. As a rule, Asian pupils are excluded less often.
In this first chart, we see that boys are permanently excluded more often than girls. Across both sexes black Caribbean children are exluded more often than white British, followed by black African and children of 'other' white backgrounds.
The Home Office published their quarterly update of crime outcomes data today, and I've been taking my periodic look at rape charge rates.
Here, first, we see that the charge rate for rapes recorded in 2020/21 has now reached 4.0% and continues to rise. #crimestats
1/ 🧵
I can provide this kind of analysis because I've been collating an archive of the quarterly updates over the last 2 yrs, something I'm not aware anyone else has done.
Here's a summary of the data.
2/
We can look at charge rate progression in chart form, comparing where successive years have got to. The dashed lines and hollow markers indicate no refresh of the data published at that point.
A couple of charts on what has happened to police officer numbers and the overall #policeworkforce.
First, the % change in police officers, counted on a headcount basis, between March 2010 and March 2023 (excl BTP).
Winners and losers.
1/🧵
Second, the % change to the overall police workforce, again on a headcount basis, between March 2010 and March 2022 (the 2023 figures haven't yet been published).
Had a quick look at MTIP 'strip searches' of children by the Met. These are More Thorough searches involving exposure of Intimate Parts, done under stop and search powers. 🧵
I looked at the 2 years from Mar 21 to Feb 23.
1/
I've looked at the Met because they publish their data on stops and searches and (separately) the subset involving MTIP searches, broken down by month, age etc. I'll provide links below.
2/
Here's my analysis tabulated.
Black children are subject to MTIP searches at 4.3x the rate of White. This is a function of the fact they are 2.0x as likely to be stopped and searched, and then 2.1x as likely to be subject to MTIP searches.
There's a #policetwitter mindset that believes every untruth about or challenge to policing must be 'robustly' confronted. That can translate into expressions of the worst values in policing, whether present today or echoing from the past, esp from behind a cloak of anonymity.
Includes the detail that the attempt to stop Mr Kaba's car followed "the activation of an automatic number plate recognition camera which indicated the vehicle was linked to a firearms incident in the previous days"
And that "no non-police issue firearm has been recovered from the vehicle or the scene."