"Chiropractic was founded ... by ... [a] “magnetic healer” who argued that most disease was a result of misaligned vertebrae. Its early leaders rejected the use of surgery and drugs, as well as the idea that germs cause disease. ...
This led many to reject vaccines."
In some places, some forms of chiropratic have evolved to something not wholly alien to modern medicine. But the fundamentalist wing continues to exert influence.
Maybe we should focus on the positive: none of the 50 states requires health insurers to reimburse bleeding and cupping.
Anyway, read the AP story, note this detail about chiropractors and naturopaths - and make your future health decisions accordingly.
PS My late father, University of Toronto DDS degree, would be very pleased to see his former speciality nudge the MDs in scientific nous.
A comedy clip on "alternative medicine": "Just because science doesn't know everything doesn't mean you can fill in the gaps with whatever fairy tale most appeals to you"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Frum

David Frum Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidfrum

6 Oct
Good evening everybody encountering for the first time the long shameful tradition of apologetics for the Spanish and papal inquisitions catholicnewsagency.com/news/1367/hist…
And no, it's not just a few individual weirdoes. The 1998 Vatican conference on the Inquisition(s) arrived at a strangely muted verdict. fides.org/en/news/2617-V…
When conservative pundits pooh-pooh the historical inquisitions, that's probably mostly laziness and ignorance. But to some degree, those pundits are also (maybe unconsciously) echoing an apologetic tradition that holds some grip on some elements of the US and European far right.
Read 6 tweets
20 Sep
August 2021 poll of vaccine hesitancy among parents of school-age children, reported by @EducationNext 1/x educationnext.org/parent-poll-re…
@EducationNext A majority of parents say they will definitely or probably vaccinate their school-age child when possible. 2/x
@EducationNext Democratic-identified parents are more enthusiastic about vaccination than Republican parents. A majority of Republican parents say they definitely or probably won't vaccinate. 3/x
Read 8 tweets
19 Sep
You believe that Bill Gates, George Soros etc. are about to impose a "great reset," abolish the US dollar, impose globalist tyranny.

How will guns help you? You're planning a one-person shoot-out against an elite hat up-ended the US govt?

How is THAT going to go?
Maybe they think it'll be like those ninja movies, where the 50 martial-arts masters politely line up so the movie protagonist can fight them one by one. "Civilization may have collapsed, but surely good sportsmanship will still count for something?"
You know what will really hold the Visigoths at bay? Paying your fair share of taxes to the world's strongest state to field the planet's most effective national security apparatus. Then arrest the Visigoths.
Read 4 tweets
17 Sep
First NO:

"Vaccinate everybody" is a clear and enforceable rule.

"Vaccinate some but not others depending on the results of a blood test as interpreted in light of medical science's ever-changing best guess as to their individual personal risk" is a muddle and a chaos.
Second NO:

"Vaccinate some, exempt others according to their bloodwork" is actually a way *more* invasive and privacy-threatening rule "vaccinate everybody."

"Show your bloodwork" is "show your papers" on steroids.
Read 6 tweets
15 Sep
a lot of the reaction to the Milley story is a reaction to over-dramatization of the Milley story
As I read the reporting, it's not at all clear that Trump was uninformed about what was happening - or any more uninformed than usual. "He wasn't listening" is not the same as "he wasn't informed."
Anyway, time to relink to this 2018 article warning against over-reliance on Woodward reporting theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Read 4 tweets
14 Sep
You don't need a new book to tell you that Trump tried to overturn an election and the Constitution by violence.

Or that House/Senate Republicans refused to impeach/convict him for his violent attempt.

Or that Trump is the front-runner for the GOP 2024 presidential nomination.
At this point, the news is not what Trump did in January 2021.

The news is the ever-growing number of Republicans willing to excuse, justify, exonerate, and repeat what Trump did in January 2021.
I know it's hard to keep being shocked.

But it did really actually happen that as a sitting president Donald Trump tried to overturn the US Constitution by violence.

And that a big chunk of the Congress and the country shrugged off the attempt as no big deal.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(