I've watched astrology forums for ages because I suspect there's disinfo being slipped in there to push people (who are often reading horoscopes out of uncertainty about their future) toward specific self-perceptions
This is the problem with debunking and fact-checking as it stands; no one is haunting the places the truly destructive disinformation is being pushed and they act like it's weird that I do so. But don't you think this would destroy someone whose self-image is fragile, make them
manipulable? And doesn't the astrological world have a good bit of crossover with the "wellness" world? Imagine someone has lost someone they love, lost their faith, started trawling astro forums for answers. Be easy to "nudge" people like that into crackpot shit
I don't think astrologers are necessarily the ones doing this, by the way, although it's not impossible. However, this looks to me like a sustained disinfo attack coming from outside, just like all the rest of them.
But maybe that's just a Gemini thing to think lol sorry I couldn't resist
And I hope it's clear that I am not shitting on astrology in general. I try never to shit on any faith nor belief system, and yes, I consider this an important element of certain faiths (unless it has Nazi shit embedded in it)
Which absolutely has historical precedent, as Nazis understood to a certain degree that to affect human behavior you have to taint human stories about ourselves, each other, and the world around us vice.com/en/article/kza…
I'm still working on developing this out. I've had a hard time finding much foundational work on it, so I'm just kinda building it all on my own. Here's the meta-categories of disinfo warfare I have been able to identify
I believe this to be of the archetypal variety, telling people lies about who and what they are and who and what they should be, and also directs them toward certain spiritual elements
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This story presents the central issue as an aberration. If you consider that perhaps was always the goal of weaponized disinformation campaigns like QAnon -- stochastic terrorism, which it is -- his behavior should make more sense. rollingstone.com/culture/cultur…
There is still a lot of denial about what QAnon actually has been and a lot of searching for the "smoking gun" of who was behind it. That's a waste of time. What's so useful about QAnon to disinfo purveyors is that it's essentially an open source process. You can see exactly what
motivates people into stochastic terrorism -- because they're writing it themselves. They're A/B testing their own way into hideous acts.
Just doing my Sunday morning reading (yes) and found this excellent disambiguation. The USA needs debunkers and mostly has fact-checkers. That's why it isn't working and why my own methods seem worthy of comment -- they just don't know any better. stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfile…
We at @erumors are debunkers rather than fact-checkers. We deal in debunking dangerous and weaponized disinformation, not fake news. Some of the stories we choose to focus on may seem innocuous, but those reveal important patterns about how disinfo digs into a population's minds.
You'd think that certain social media platforms would know about this research and readjust their priorities accordingly. Unless..............
no, Google, we do not trust you to curate our news. Please stop doing this bullshit and FUND JOURNALISM, and I don't mean fucking grants. Quit making us beg for the money that is ours by right. We made that money. Fund it it free and clear, no strings attached
This story is an excellent example of why I am saying what I am saying
All these assholes love to talk out of boths sides of their mouth on this. They'll throw money at shiny "fact-checking conferences" that are essentially a bunch of pompous blowhards farting out the most boring bullshit imaginable as everyone applauds -- as they allow this shit.
How can you pretend you value freedom of speech when you allow people who actually have important things to say to be drowned out by known disinformation purveyors?