With changes in Brazil’s Fake News Bill in the pipeline, lawmakers must firmly reject the traceability mandate. It undermines users’ rights and key principles of privacy and security on end-to-end encrypted apps. @orlandosilva @DepBrunaFurlan 1/6 eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
@EFF As we pointed out: the traceability mandate moves companies away from the privacy-focused engineering and data minimization principles that should characterize secure messaging apps. 2/6
@EFF A far more proportionate alternative to investigations was already presented, relating to targeted and substantiated preservation warrants for metadata, provided there’s no association with the content of communications. 3/6 jota.info/opiniao-e-anal…
@EFF The proposal also aims to safeguard privacy-by-design implementations by not allowing requests that exceed the scope and technical limits of the service. 4/6 jota.info/opiniao-e-anal…
@EFF Since the Senate’s debates, national and international organizations, experts, and UN and IACHR rapporteurs voiced the serious implications of the traceability mandate for human rights. 5/6 plfakenews.direitosnarede.org.br
@EFF It’s time Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies reject the traceability rule (art. 10) taking into account the many risks and fundamental rights involved. 6/6 eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
