Matt Taibbi's ShakeShack is (pretending to be) OUTRAGED by stories that point out that COVID treatments are promising but no substitute for vaccines that prevent people from getting sick in the first place
Imagine THIS being the COVID-related media coverage you find objectionable (as opposed to, say, the massive Fox anti-vaxx disinfo campaign.) I had no idea it was biologically possible to be that far up your own ass
And needless to say this is the DeSantis party line: why worry about stopping people from getting a deadly virus if you can treat some of the people who get extremely sick
This is not actually the way I would like the Mariners to solve the problem of me having to chair an APSA panel in the middle of their first meaningful Game 162 in 20 years 🙃🙃🙃
At least I will receive $450 in compensation for performing this service [taps earpiece] oh I will PAY $450 to be able to do this I see nothing at all abnormal about my profession
In retrospect having Tom Glavine throw out the first pitch was a bad sign
Gottenheimer/Sinema oppose two of the most broadly popular provisions in the bill (cheaper prescription drugs/upper-class tax increases)! There is no empirical basis for what is asserted here as unassailable fact at all
A lot of elite reporters and politicians alike have views in the "socially liberal, fiscally conservative" empty quadrant and love to project them on the public in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence
Would also love to hear an explanation for why Kyrtsen Sinema feels pressured by constituents (LOL) to oppose the radical leftism of [checks notes] Joe Biden, when Mark Kelly with exactly the same constituents does not
Wine-drinking, food-eating, breath-taking MAVERICK defies Washington's RULES by threatening to allow the Senate to obstruct popular legislation for the first time in history
Opposing legislation because your wealthy donors tell you to may not be how things are done in Washington D.C., but a breath of fresh air is here to SHAKE THINGS UP
See, there's your problem. If the BBBA focused on material issues like child care and Medicare benefits rather than mandatory daily diversity training they'd have a better chance of getting Sinema's vote
"These people are so pompous and thin-skinned. A guy like Alito wouldn’t survive for thirty seconds in a debate between equals, which is why being a federal judge is the ideal job for him, assuming Pope or Emperor isn’t currently available" lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/09/sam-al…
Alito's whiny aggrievement reminds me of the Intellectual Horse Paste Web guy who thought his resignation should be a national news story lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/09/i-came…
On top of this there's some serious Lawyer Brain going on -- he seems to really think that people won't notice that a medical procedure that is the end result of one in five pregnancies isn't available if the Court doesn't say explicitly that Roe has been overruled
One reason Wells is a great critic is that the perfect one-liners are generally building up to a serious argument -- in this case, that 11MP's decision to go vegan seems an awful lot like cynical profit-taking rather than a principled commitment