The final entry in Dave Chappelle’s run of Netflix specials is yet another master class in comedy. He holds that Detroit audience in the palm of his hand, even as he crosses lines and deliberately uses words he knows they won’t like. And that is because they trust him.
The audience trusts there isn’t any malice behind Chappelle’s jokes. Words that have so much power to hurt when uttered by people who hate are disarmed by him. Chappelle isn’t being offensive as much as he is mocking how we might believe he is that offensive of a person.
Most of Chappelle’s act has characters, who he twists into caricatures to illustrate a perspective, which is that as a Black man there’s a certain insufferable whiteness to many of the gripes that seem to define a good number of the issues of our times.
Chappelle caps it all off with the bittersweet story of Daphne, which punches you right in the gut. All of the previously mentioned characters might be real people, but to the audience none are more real than Daphne.
Oh, and Twitter is not a real place. There may be occasional bursts of realness by people being their authentic selves in threads. But most people just use the site to get away with things they’d never say directly to a person’s face, which makes it pretty damn fake.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Anyways, I'm glad you didn't like having your work edited and left Firedoglake so I could turn the column into something more accessible and impactful.
From WikiLeaks to Occupy to numerous whistleblower cases, I've never had to depend on the intervention of an editor, who would translate my writing so people could actually understand what the fuck I was writing about.
Journalists for Yahoo! News finally confirmed a narrative around Mike Pompeo and the CIA's war on WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange, which I outlined back in October 2019. It's an important report.
WikiLeaks' publication of "Vault 7" materials from the CIA was hugely embarrassing. Even though the CIA had increased spying operations against WikiLeaks, they still were surprised the media organization obtained a trove of the agency's extremely sensitive files.
CIA director Mike Pompeo was afraid President Donald Trump would learn about the "Vault 7" materials and think less of him. "Don’t tell him, he doesn’t need to know."
But it was too important. Trump had to be informed.
For all of September, The Dissenter will mark 20th anniversary of #September11 with retrospective series on rise of security state that puts whistleblowers front and center. Because these individuals listened to their conscience & implored us to turn away from the dark side.
FBI whistleblower Coleen Rowley accused FBI Headquarters of failing to urgently respond to intelligence ahead of #September11.
Embarrassed, the FBI became a "preventative crime" agency, concocting terrorism plots they could take credit for thwarting.
@shadowproofcom We didn't ask @adfontesmedia to include us in their chart and review our articles for bias and reliability, but they did. Their team gave our posts pretty high scores for reliability. And we don't hide our bias so who cares where they plot us.
One of the posts reviewed is a parody of a Max Boot column that I wrote so I don't know how it could be reliable, and I don't believe bias is all that relevant. (And it's marked so they could've chosen anything else.)
The first hearing before the UK High Court of Justice in the US government's appeal in WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's extradition case will start shortly. I'm remotely observing.
Thread for updates on the "preliminary" appeal hearing.
This Assange appeal hearing is not the main appeal hearing. That will come later.
Today's hearing is on the two grounds for appeal that the High Court of Justice declined to grant the US government. Prosecutors will try to persuade the High Court they were wrong.
This hearing for the US will be focused on discrediting Professor Michael Kopelman, an experienced neuropsychiatrist who assessed Assange from May-December 2019.
It will also be about the US's view that the district judge gave too much weight to certain suicide risk evidence.
The four remaining Espionage Act charges against drone whistleblower Daniel Hale that US prosecutors refused to drop were dismissed with prejudice by Judge Liam O'Grady. And just about all of the coverage of Hale's sentencing didn't report this remarkable development.
It unfortunately wasn't acknowledged in the report from @etuckerAP nor was it in @joshgerstein's coverage. It wasn't in @rachelweinerwp's coverage for Washington Post either. It isn't mentioned in The Intercept's coverage by @rdevro and @MazMHussain. And I missed it initially.
Only because I interviewed @ChipGibbons89 after sentencing did I learn that the four remaining Espionage Act charges were dismissed. But I wasn't able to attend court proceedings while these other media organizations did have reporters present.