The terrible situation STILL faced by victims of the #cladding scandal demonstrates the outrageous nature of limited liability. Limited liability is a free gift to corporations. It allows them to walk away, leaving others to pick up the bill.
Here's what to do about it.
Thread
Limited liability should be a commercial product, purchased by limited companies from insurers, who can assess the nature and scale of the risk, and charge accordingly.
This would elimate at a stroke a large part of the externality problem.
More here: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Why is this subject so seldom raised? One scandal after another reveals the cost that the current nature of limited liability transfers either to victims of corporate corner-cutting, or to taxpayers, who have to pick up the pieces.
It's time to start talking about it.
Limited liability, in its current form is a subsidy, granted to corporations by the state.
Worldwide, it might amount to trillions of dollars.
This subsidy incentivises reckless and irresponsible behaviour.
It must be among the most perverse subsidies of all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Solidarity with @ChrisGPackham, unbowed despite yet another disgraceful attack.
Intimidation is rife in the countryside, especially against those who oppose hunting and environmental destruction. It's far from the domain of innocence we like to imagine. theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/o…
All too often, the police turn a blind eye not only to illegal hunting but also to attacks on those who oppose it. Around the country, they need to step up.
Something we urgently need to get past is the idea of "real" country people vs "interlopers" (ie those who weren't born locally). It's often associated with xenophobia and a closed and extreme mindset. Everywhere, new people bring new ideas, and should be welcomed.
1. This is really presumptuous of me, and I’m an amateur in the field, but reading through the most popular definitions of capitalism, it seems that almost all them airbrush its true nature to some degree. Could we, together, develop a better one, in one sentence?
Thread/
2. I’m probably deceiving myself, but this feels to me like a tight definition. Unfortunately it’s likely to be incomprehensible to almost everyone:
“Capitalism is an economic system that constantly creates and ruptures its own hypervolume.”
3. This draws on a crucial ecological concept, developed by GE Hutchinson in 1957: the n-dimensional hypervolume. Here’s the presentation in which he explains it: www2.unil.ch/biomapper/Down…
Only when we look at the deep history of capitalism do we see it for what it really is: a fire front, raging across the planet, ignited by people who operate offshore.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Those who say they want to “reform” capitalism or “tame” capitalism appear to suffer from a fundamental misunderstanding of what capitalism is. They believe the story it tells about itself: that it’s a matter of buying and selling, hard work and enterprise. It really isn’t.
Capitalism is a specific and novel system, that arose in the mid-15th Century as a response to the opportunities created by colonisation. It involves not only the commodification of land, labour and money, but also the consumption of natural wealth and abandonment of the residue.
As journalists, we all make mistakes. God knows I’ve made a few. But we should try to minimise them, by checking claims and confirming sources. This is especially important when an issue is highly contentious. And few are more contentious than this. Thread/
When I asked Dawn for confirmation of this story, she kindly sent this reply.
Is the @NobelPrize for sciences outdated?
Science is like this.
Everyone here plays a crucial role in creating the pyramid. The person at the top is often arbitrary and perceptual. You can turn the pyramid on its side, and see a similar picture.
Our obsession with winners and our exaggerated perception of individual success might have made sense in an age of lonely pioneers. It makes no sense an age of massive, multinational collaborations.
I think we need new ways of recognising scientific progress and success.
There's also a long history of overlooking the contributions of women. Which often goes with the territory of treating collaboration as if it were rugged individualism.
I've been trying to find out more about a case reported across the media, of a woman allegedly left paralysed by Insulate Britain protests. So far the only evidence I can find is a call to a phone-in show by someone who didn't provide a surname. Has it been confirmed? Thanks.
The Daily Mail made this request to its readers:
"Do you know Chris or his mother affected by the protest? Get in touch"
It has not followed up, as far as I can see. This raises questions for me. It's the kind of story the Mail would give more space to if it had more material.
None of the media outlets that reported it appear to have conducted due diligence on this important story, ie attempted to discover whether or not it is true. It might be true. But you'd hope for a higher evidential bar than a call to a phone-in, without even a surname.