I've been trying to find out more about a case reported across the media, of a woman allegedly left paralysed by Insulate Britain protests. So far the only evidence I can find is a call to a phone-in show by someone who didn't provide a surname. Has it been confirmed? Thanks.
The Daily Mail made this request to its readers:

"Do you know Chris or his mother affected by the protest? Get in touch"

It has not followed up, as far as I can see. This raises questions for me. It's the kind of story the Mail would give more space to if it had more material.
None of the media outlets that reported it appear to have conducted due diligence on this important story, ie attempted to discover whether or not it is true. It might be true. But you'd hope for a higher evidential bar than a call to a phone-in, without even a surname.
Someone has pointed out to me that the caller was introduced as calling from Kingsclere in Hampshire, which is 36 miles from the M25. But Basingstoke Hospital is 8 miles from Kingsclere. There's a lot about this story that is hard to understand.
I hope very much that @toryboypierce, who took the call, can help to clear the matter up.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

5 Oct
Is the @NobelPrize for sciences outdated?
Science is like this.
Everyone here plays a crucial role in creating the pyramid. The person at the top is often arbitrary and perceptual. You can turn the pyramid on its side, and see a similar picture. Image
Our obsession with winners and our exaggerated perception of individual success might have made sense in an age of lonely pioneers. It makes no sense an age of massive, multinational collaborations.
I think we need new ways of recognising scientific progress and success.
There's also a long history of overlooking the contributions of women. Which often goes with the territory of treating collaboration as if it were rugged individualism.
Read 6 tweets
1 Oct
The worst major crop for soil erosion in the UK is maize: widely spaced, planted and harvested late, leaving the land bare in winter: a formula for disaster. Most of it is grown for animal feed, but the fastest expansion is for anaerobic digestion. Thread/ assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… Image
In both cases, we’re compromising the future productivity of the land, and therefore our own survival, for perverse and unnecessary reasons (we don’t need animal products). But growing maize to dump into anaerobic digesters is a real outrage.
The whole point of AD was to use waste materials to make biogas. That’s how it was sold to us. But from the beginning, the government encouraged farmers to grow dedicated crops for it, especially maize, silage and potatoes, all which happen to be ecologically devastating.
Read 7 tweets
1 Oct
I’m still getting harangued by people insisting that the “real” problem is too many children being born, blissfully unaware that birth rates are collapsing. Residual growth is caused by demographic momentum. They are literally arguing with a mathematical function.
Thread/
It’s like a wave generated in the mid-Atlantic by a storm four generations ago, which is only now reaching the shore. Those demanding we stop it are the King Canutes of our time.
Why does this wilful ignorance persist? Because it’s a highly convenient way of deflecting blame.
Rather than complaining about birthrates, it would make more sense, at this point in the curve, to complain about longevity. But this would mean the argument bounced back onto the people making the complaint. And the whole point, consciously or otherwise, is to shift the blame.
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
I now believe that if I live into my 90s, I have a high chance of witnessing systemic environmental collapse.
By systemic environmental collapse, I mean something specific: an Earth system passing its critical threshold, then triggering the tipping of other systems.
I'm 58.
If this cascade begins, it could happen very quickly. There would be nothing we could do to stop it. The only means of preventing it is determined action now.
By determined action, I mean efforts one or two orders of magnitude greater than current efforts.
Preventing systemic environmental collapse requires systemic economic change. At the moment, the most any government offers is tinkering at the margins of the current economic system.
Read 11 tweets
29 Sep
This isn’t a climate emergency, or a biodiversity emergency, or a pollution emergency, or a soil emergency.
It's a full-spectrum assault on every aspect of the living world.
And our only means of stopping it is to level down.
My column.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Systems thinking helps us to edge a little closer to what Kant called the ding an sich: the world as it is, rather than the world bounded by our perceptions. Of course, we will never progress beyond a certain point, because our senses shape this thinking too. But ...
Thread/
The highly simplified model of the world projected by politics and the media makes moral idiots of us all.
In science and mathematics, extraordinary advances have been made in the understanding of how complex systems work. But these are not reflected in public discussion.
Read 9 tweets
28 Sep
It's unsurprising that @sapinker's book Enlightenment Now is loved by billionaires. It's a catalogue of system-justifying falsehoods. I analysed the environment chapter, and found it crammed with anecdote, cherry-picking and discredited claims: monbiot.com/2018/03/09/con…
People who have spent similar amounts of time parsing other chapters that cover their specialisms, have reached the same conclusions. It's a total crock.
However, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bill Clinton and others heavily invested in the status quo are mad about it.
He's been right about stuff in the past, but this book is a lazy recitation of rightwing talking points, relying on secondary or tertiary sources that suit his arguments, and making numerous claims that are demonstrably false.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(