"[W]e have a very old word for persuasive communication with an agenda: propaganda. That term, however, comes with historical baggage. It presumes that governments, authority figures, institutions, and mass media are forcing ideas on regular people from the top down.
"But more and more, the opposite is happening. Far from being merely a target, the public has become an active participant in creating and selectively amplifying narratives that shape realities.
"Perhaps the best word for this emergent bottom-up dynamic is one that doesn’t exist quite yet: ampliganda, the shaping of perception through amplification."
[I am not a fan of this term. I'm eager to find something catchier that accomplishes the same thing.]
"It can originate from an online nobody or an onscreen celebrity. No single person or organization bears responsibility for its transmission. And it is having a profound effect on democracy and society.
"Buttar’s #PelosiMustGo was both typical and unusual. Hashtag campaigns occur all the time, but I happened to catch this one right at the start.
"First, it was a blip in a corner of the internet, but the hashtag soon lit up the modern propaganda system.
"This amplification chain is incredibly powerful; it surfaces civil-rights violations, protest movements, and breaking events, whether traditional media choose to cover those events or not.
"About the author: Renée DiResta is the technical research manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory." theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Engaging with trolls amplifies their voice. Use screenshots, people.
"Buttar had two key prerequisites for creating a viral moment: an Extremely Online supporter base experienced in Twitter conflict, and a hashtag slogan expressing righteous indignation.
"At 11:57 a.m., a Twitter user who went by @Pondipper and had a modest 1,700 followers, jumped the gun: #PelosiMustGo. Tweet No. 1.
"Buttar himself posted promptly at noon: “Why do you think #PelosiMustGo?” he asked his 113,000 followers.
The tweet inspired several hundred replies and retweets, some encouraging him, others questioning him, others mocking him.
"BUT ANYONE WHO ENGAGED WITH BUTTAR'S POST — WHETHER TO APPLAUD IT OR SCORN IT — WAS TELLING TWITTER ALGORITHMS TO ELEVATE IT."
[I have posted this in all caps to emphasize this point. Do not engage with trolls!]
"My coffee cooled as the hashtag moved up Twitter’s rankings and began elbowing aside trends about AR-15s, golf, Donald Trump’s pardons, and then–Education Secretary Betsy DeVos."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Behind-the-scenes redistricting work: Adam Foltz, who was part of a secretive process that crafted Wisconsin’s legislative maps, is on the payroll of the Texas Legislative Council, a nonpartisan state agency that manages the internal mapping tool used in redistricting.
"Records show the agency hired him as a 'legislative professional' at a $120,000 annual salary, but Kimberly Shields, the council’s executive director, said Foltz reports to the House Redistricting Committee.
"Shields and other legislative staffers did not respond to questions about Foltz’s involvement in redistricting.
"In 2019, she joined Facebook to work on civic misinformation. She took the job because she viewed it as an opportunity to make sure others wouldn’t experience the pain she did of losing a friend to online conspiracies, she said at the Yale panel." washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
"She also wanted to do her part in the run-up to the 2020 election to prevent a repeat of the foreign interference in the 2016 election, she said.
"She went into the company clear-eyed about the problems with social media, which had been extensively covered by the news media in the fallout of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. But she soon learned that the problems were much worse than she realized.
"The Claremont Institute, a conservative think tank that ex-Trump legal adviser John Eastman works for as a senior fellow, on Monday defended Eastman’s memo to then-President Donald Trump ...
"and then-Vice President Mike Pence that laid out how the latter could hijack the 2020 election certification process to keep Trump in power.
"The organization released a statement that spun Eastman’s memo, which blatantly sought to help Trump subvert the election, as mere 'legal advice' that has 'since been maliciously misrepresented and distorted by major media outlets.'
"About a month after Kim announced his departure, Trump nominated Treasury Department official David Malpass to run the World Bank." news.yahoo.com/how-donald-tru…
"In announcing the nomination in February, Trump said he hoped that Malpass would make sure that 'U.S. taxpayers’ dollars are spent effectively and wisely' and that 'financing is focused on the places and projects that truly need assistance.'
"Once the chief economist at investment firm Bear Stearns, Malpass was best known for a 2007 op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that infamously predicted that the unstable housing market —
"By September, Haugen had made the decision not just to leak documents but to go public as a whistleblower.
" 'I just don’t want to agonize over what I didn’t do for the rest of my life. Compared to that, anything else doesn’t seem that bad,' Haugen wrote in a text.
"What happens to America's mental health under a second Trump administration? Very bad things" salon.com/2021/10/10/wha…
Dr. John Gartner predicts:
"Democracy would be dead, and the coup complete. All future 'elections' would be Putin-style shams, where the electorate never actually has the power to remove the Republicans from power.
"We could expect criminal prosecutions against Democratic leaders, the press and anyone who opposed the regime. Experts of all types would be persecuted.