When I got to one thousand followers, I sent out a booty shot. I don't know what you're supposed to do at 10k, so I'm going to send out
*Kill Anarchist Idols*
A Thread:
If we're on here to spread anarchist ideas (is that why we're on here?), it helps to have some larger accounts because of the way Twitter is structured. But it's probably not a great idea for those accounts to be in the hands of a few individuals.
2/
At the bottom of the thread, I'm going to send out a list of collective accounts to follow, but first I want to problematize certain ideas of power.
3/
In my research for Anarchy Works & Worshiping Power, it became abundantly clear that hierarchy relates to how a society builds and practices power. It seems to be more a result of centralizing and unifying different forms of power rather than recognizing leadership. Plenty of
4/
(if not all?) anti-authoritarian, stateless societies recognize different forms of leadership, each practicing different, non-fungible, non-transferable forms of power, but also a distrust of leadership & plenty of tools to criticize, belittle, expel, or assassinate leaders.
5/
In the present case, the key problem seems to be exaggerating the importance of one movement activity, writing books, and not recognizing or valuing many other movement activities. With that kind of power, a "succesful" author can capitalize their platform and even
6/
climb into greater social hierarchies estranged from the movement. What an anarchist writer of books should do, in my mind, is dedicate themselves to ongoing struggles & pertinent theoretical problems rather than building a career.
The problem then is a movement that reproduces7/
dominant society practices around fame, and individual authors who aggrandize the platform given to them or fail to use that platform to support the construction of other platforms centered on activities of care, healing, construction, anti-repression work, and a long etc.
8/
In the day-to-day of the movement, however, I would say that those with the most power are those who successfully navigate the rumor networks & informal spaces of socializing (parties,hang outs). This is a huge problem, not only because that type of person tends to be wretched
9/
but also because of the inherent ableism of those structures and because of how those norms of communication make our movements excellent habitats for infiltrators and manipulators, and places where healthy responses to conflict become impossible.
10/
Anywho. I don't want to spend more time on Twitter, but in addition to the Texts of the Week, I'm going to occasionally pick a topic and recommend people to follow on that topic. And I also want to invite people to recommend topics they want to see addressed.
11/
So let's spead the love and boost some good projects. The idea that a collective is somehow immune from promoting hierarchical dynamics, evading accountability, or being the project of a single person, would of course be erroneous. Nonetheless, give these accounts a follow!
12/
To see things clearly, one needn't read Galeano, Vine Deloria Jr, Howard Zinn. Colombo supported mutilations, land theft, total slavery, and sex slavery for children in his f*cking diary. #NothingtoCelebrate
This demonstrates the limits of debate.
Anyone who negates the genocidal reality of Columbus, the US, whiteness, the bourgeoisie: those aren't beliefs that deserve respect. They're alibis to facilitate life in a world constructed by mass murderers like Columbus (and George Washington)
2/
and to justify receiving some of the bloody profits.
It's good to have the books and studies, but unless we constitute ourselves as a force to destroy this world, the white supremacist histories and identities won't disappear.
There's a great morass of misinformation around yesterday's "anarchist gulags in Catalunya" crap, which is not surprising, given it came from authoritarian socialists deflecting from their history of systematic repression and murder.
Thread: Repression in an anarchist revolution
The most true thing about the shitposting is that anarchists generally responded: if anarchists really did set up gulags in 1936, that was wrong of them;
whereas the authoritarian socialists could neither offer a self-critique of their own history nor an honest critique of their opponents. This openness to analysis and self-critique, the insistence on uniting means and ends, is why I am an anarchist.
When someone responds to criticisms of industrialism with cries of "primitivist" it's a safe bet they won't engage in good faith and they don't have a nuanced critique.
In this case, I don't think they're even anticapitalist if they think:
industrialism "lift[s] people out of extreme poverty", that you can't provide universal public housing without concrete, and that "rural poverty" is something that exists naturally rather than being a feature of industrialization itself.
And then there's the bizarre take that "all" nuclear waste could fit in a single room and can be "disposed" of safely.
Thread:
This excellent book looks at the impact of European slaving in Africa, the loss of the past for enslaved people, the predation of African states against stateless peoples, the limitations of independence in West Africa, and the fate of Pan-Africanism.
West African states and aristocracies attained immense power and wealth through the slave trade, but all of this was wiped out by the way Africa was forcibly integrated into the "global" (colonial/neocolonial) economy,
with the most widespread African currency being stripped of its value then illegalized by European colonizers almost overnight.
In effect, European colonizers produced wealth through the slave trade that they used to fuel further wealth production, state-building, and war-making,
So: there is a high possibility of a global economic collapse in the next 10 years (or weeks). There are more and more fronts of systemic instability, and global supply chains are simultaneously very very long and very very skinny (without the redundancies of healthy networks).
If it happens, national govts will have to intervene in some capacity. This could be as extreme as a full mobilization of the emergency management paradigm, w/ military in the streets and govt distribution of essential supplies/direction of production & distribution.
In most places, we're not currently strong enough to oppose this directly, although experiences show we will have a great capacity to develop mutual aid initiatives more effective than the govt survival infrastructure.
Just a reminder that the Communist Party of China are highly effective managers of capital, and global investors, in particular US capitalists since the Nixon years, rely on them to play that role.
One of the big flaws in statist anti-imperialist narratives is how they seemed to miss one of the most important dramas of the 20th century, the split between the USSR and China, triggered in large part by USSR's imperialist treatment of China.
However, framing China as the anti-imperialist hero erases their imperialist behavior towards Vietnam, continuing w/out interruption the behavior of imperial (pre-socialist) China towards SE Asia