So: there is a high possibility of a global economic collapse in the next 10 years (or weeks). There are more and more fronts of systemic instability, and global supply chains are simultaneously very very long and very very skinny (without the redundancies of healthy networks).
If it happens, national govts will have to intervene in some capacity. This could be as extreme as a full mobilization of the emergency management paradigm, w/ military in the streets and govt distribution of essential supplies/direction of production & distribution.
In most places, we're not currently strong enough to oppose this directly, although experiences show we will have a great capacity to develop mutual aid initiatives more effective than the govt survival infrastructure.
We need to drive home that capitalism is a failed system and that govts are not as capable as we are at taking care of basic needs. We need to expand our ability to defend mutual aid networks, and up our game for taking over and running useful infrastructure.
We also need to account for the white supremacist distribution of productive infrastructures on a global scale. This means that countries in the Global South are much more dependent on global supply chains and they have less useful infrastructure they could potentially socialize.
We need to increase our ability to contemplate mutual aid, survival, and expropriations on a global scale rather than let our friends and comrades in the Global South die off in the face of a collapse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just a reminder that the Communist Party of China are highly effective managers of capital, and global investors, in particular US capitalists since the Nixon years, rely on them to play that role.
One of the big flaws in statist anti-imperialist narratives is how they seemed to miss one of the most important dramas of the 20th century, the split between the USSR and China, triggered in large part by USSR's imperialist treatment of China.
However, framing China as the anti-imperialist hero erases their imperialist behavior towards Vietnam, continuing w/out interruption the behavior of imperial (pre-socialist) China towards SE Asia
Brief (late) suggestion for an anarchist positionality in the pandemic.
*The line of conflict runs through the lives of people who are being hurt by the capitalist and statist response.*
That seems obvious, but we often don't stop to trace that line before acting.
A THREAD
Our battlefield is in the workplaces where workers don't have healthcare or sick days or safe conditions; in the hospitals neglected by the state; in the streets when people are punished for organizing on the job.
We should defend the survival of an expansive "we" through strike actions and mutual aid initiatives. The strike actions may temporarily rely on union structures, but they should point to a path of worker self-organization leading to a world without bosses or alienated consumers
The State is not a viable instrument for protecting the planet.
Direct action, anti-state, and anti-colonial struggles have been doing the real work.
The State has just given us broken promises and repression.
Palm oil plantations blocked in Borneo. Pipelines stopped in North America. An airport cancelled in France. Coal mining slowed in Germany. Drag net fishing sabotaged in the Adriatic. Urban gardening and food sovereignty built up in racist food deserts from Durban to Atlanta.
Indigenous land recovered, restored, and reforested, and food sovereignty achieved in territory nominally occupied by the Brazilian, Chilean, and Venezuelan states. Forest gardens protected from greenwashed nature preserves and monocrop commercial forests in India.
All the polarization aside, I find myself in the middle on this one.
On the one hand the point that nearly the entire Left will get swept up in support of patriotic wars destroying years of momentum, whether it's 1914 or 2001, is tragic and true and we shouldn't expect otherwise.
Though I imagine CR doesn't go this way, for me it's another reason for anticapitalist and anticolonial movements to retain a historically accurate view of our relation to the Left rather than considering ourselves part of it. Because of its systematic role in these moments.
On the other hand those who prioritize movement building are obvs gonna be frustrated with this kind of flippant take because it decenters all the hard organizing and valuable lessons that were drawn from countless protests, port blockades, counterrecruiting campaigns, and more.
#OtD in 1936, fascists executed 4000 unarmed people connected to the workers' movement in Badajoz.
Also during these days, 15 years earlier, Spain began a massive campaign of mustard gas against rebelling Amazigh populations in their north African colonies.
Many thousands were killed, though there is little documentation and almost complete apathy across the Spanish left.
Even a focus on self-preservation would demand these atrocities receive more attention, since fascism begins in the colonies and then comes home.
The colonial war was a key stage in the careers of Franco and other future fascist leaders. But it seems unexamined white supremacy is stronger.
Please share this with everyone who is sinking into desperation:
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT URGENT.
It was urgent in the 60s, 70, 80s, and 90s. Now, tens of millions of people are ALREADY dying every year and species are going extinct at an unprecedented rate due to #ClimateCrisis
and all the interlocking ecological and social crises. The institutions sharing this narrative of urgency are the ones who did not take valid actions when there was still time, who even criminalized such actions while profiting off false solutions.
The reason they talk urgency now is not because they care about all the poor and racialized people who are dying or the unique habitats being lost, it's because they are afraid of losing power. They admit this quite clearly at Davos, at NATO summits, in their financial journals.