1. So, the Eternals are finally coming to the MCU. Which raises the inevitable question, "is that a good idea?" And, for vast majority of people, the prior question, "what the hell are The Eternals?"
2. Briefly, The Eternals is comic book Jack Kirby created in 1976 which use the then vogue of Erich von Däniken takes up many of his favorite tropes (the merging of mythology with space opera, secret history, the return of the gods, humanity under the judgement of the divine). Image
3. Kirby's The Eternals is a rip-roaring head trip which I highly recommend. It's a lesser known part of his marvel work but the MCU has had a good track record of turning obscurities into hits (Guardians of the Galaxy etc). But I have my doubts here...
4. The spanner in the works here is that Kirby initially conceived The Eternals as a stand-alone series apart from the Marvel Universe. The original title was The Return of the Gods but Marvel already has a surplus of Gods (Thor, Loki Hercules, etc.).
5. The premise of Kirby's Eternals was humanity would be shocked by revelations about the alpha and omega: news that species has siblings (the demons & gods of mythology) but also a confrontation with a creator now making judgement (Celestials). That's bad fit for MCU.
6. Kirby clashed with editors who made ill-conceived push to integrate Eternals in Marvel Universe (the compromise was a character called the Pseudo-Hulk). That derailed the project, so the original conception of Genesis & Apocalypse got lost.
7. There's a larger debate to be had whether the Marvel Universe is just too damn crowded. I think ideas like the X-Men or characters like Spider-Man are best treated as stand-alones, so themes of marginalized group or individual alienation can shine forth.
8. If you want more on Kirby's The Eternals, both as a primer for the movie & a discussion of a fascinating if derailed series, boy do I have a podcast for you: jeetheer.substack.com/p/podcast-the-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeet Heer

Jeet Heer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HeerJeet

3 Oct
1. The two big sci-fi epics of this fall are Dune & Foundation, which spring from the same source: John W. Campbell's Astounding magazine (remained Analog in 1960). Which also gave the world Starship Troopers, the Thing, and, oh, yes, various religions, including Scientology.
2. John W. Campbell, the editor of Astounding, was both a visionary and complete crackpot. He was a formative influence on many careers (Asimov, Heinlein, Herbert). Also a promoter of, variously, a perpetual motion machine, ESP, slavery, smoking & Dianetics
3. Campbell was type of contrarian crank of the type all too familiar to us today: a failed engineer, he banged off editorials on the merits of slavery (calling for its revival), deriding the idea that smoking was bad for you & promoting Dianetics as a cure for health problems
Read 7 tweets
2 Oct
1. @beverlygage took a courageous & honourable stance in resigning as head of the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy. The donor pressure on the program was an intolerable violation of academic freedom. But worth asking what donors wanted from Grand Strategy at start
2. One way to understand Yale's Grand Strategy Program (heavily funded from the start by plutocratic Republican donors) is that it followed after 9/11 the familiar right-wing strategy of serving as a counter-institution to circumvent expert opinion: the "Team B" strategy.
3. The "Team B" strategy is one you use when traditional expert opinion isn't giving you the results you want: you create counter-institutions (think tanks, new programs) to give the impression that the mainstream consensus is disputable.
Read 8 tweets
1 Oct
1. Great thread. I return to paradox that the Claremont Institute, so heavily shaped by the late Harry Jaffa, who idealized Lincoln as the great vindicator of American democracy, is now now run by people who want to minimize the importance of the Civil War or are neo-Confederates
2. The thing is, while Jaffa's scholarship on Lincoln (primarily Crisis of the House Divided) & his attacks on neo-Calhounites (in many polemics) are great, Jaffa himself was a slippery political actor willing to make alliances with dubious characters.
3. George Kateb noted this early as 1965, pointing out contradiction between Jaffa's Lincoln celebration & his work as Goldwater speechwriter (since Goldwater opposed Civil Rights Act). Can also be seen in Jaffa's friendship with neo-confederate M.E. Bradford.
Read 7 tweets
24 Sep
1. An interesting thread here with important objection from @jbouie. I think Bouie is right especially on a key point: that the Eastman strategy (Pence not certifying) went hand in hand with the state legislature strategy (and I would add the Jan. 6 riot strategy).
2. Trump's coup attempt should be seen as a war fought with disparate but converging forces: it relied on legal theorists like Eastman (to justify not certifying), co-operative GOP pols (Cruz, Grassley, Rand), state legislature and (as a pressure point) the Jan. 6 riots.
3. The fact that the coup didn't work is hardly reassuring considering how many different political forces Trump was able to get to go along with this crackpot scheme (and vast majority of GOP congress was after the fact unwilling to impeach/remove). Also: its still going on.
Read 4 tweets
23 Sep
1. John Eastman, author of infamous coup memos, is an eminently respectable member of the legal establishment as both a professor and star in The Federalist Society. His role as an advocate for a coup should spark an effort to delegitimize not just him but that establishment
2. The rioters of January 6 are subject to criminal penalties. No such penalties apply to theorists like Eastman who provided the rational for the coup attempt. But surely civil society has the power to sanction and ostracize?
3. We're already seen civil society sanction in people speaking out about Eastman's upcoming participation in a big political science conference. But I would insist that the sanction should extend beyond Eastman to institutions that support him.
Read 6 tweets
22 Sep
1. In the New York Times, James McWhorter wrote about the late actor Fredric March's membership of a fraternity calling itself the Ku Klux Klan. McWhorter's piece is partly effective but undermined by the mental habits of reflexive contrarianism.
2. The strongest point of McWhorter's piece was the call for a holistic understanding of March's life: he really was a life-long passionate supporter of civil rights, with the KKK frat membership an anomaly. But then McWhorter wants to also minimize the frat.
3. The strange thing here is that the main argument (March's really stellar life) is plausible & sufficient in and of itself, that McWhorter didn't need to make the absurd claim that frat could call itself the Klu Klux Klan just because "boys" love the "k" sound.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(