Can anybody explain what US Treasury Secretary Yellen means? "Yellen spoke with IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva to discuss the serious issues raised by the investigation into the World Bank’s Doing Business 2018 report."
"Secretary Yellen expressed that her priority is to preserve the integrity and credibility of the World Bank and the IMF, and for that reason, it was essential that the IMF Board conducted a thorough, fair, and timely review of the findings by WilmerHale."
"Secretary Yellen...noted it is Treasury’s view, in line with other IMF Board members, that absent further direct evidence with regard to the role of the Managing Director there is not a basis for a change in IMF leadership."
"Secretary Yellen also conveyed that Treasury will monitor follow-up closely, evaluate any new facts or findings, and that the WilmerHale report does underscore the need for shareholders to be vigilant in defending the integrity of both the Bank and the Fund."
And???
"proactive steps must be taken to reinforce data integrity and credibility at the IMF, and that the institution and its leadership must renew their commitment to upholding transparency and whistleblower protections..."
And???
"Secretary Yellen conveyed to the Managing Director that she holds the IMF to the highest standard of integrity and stands committed to work with her foreign counterparts to ensure the Fund can continue its critical and necessary work..."
And???
This issue is important. Does the US Treasury have a view? To judge from the Yellen statement today, it has not. I would appreciate further information.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Putin today: "gas reserves in many European countries’ underground storage facilities dwindled as a result of the harsh winter in early 2021."
Because much belongs to Gazprom & are filled to only 10-15%.
Gazprom should not be allowed to own EU storage. en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
Putin: "the practices of our European partners [are to blame]. These practices have reaffirmed that, properly speaking, they have made mistakes. We were talking with the former European Commission"
How can the EU be blamed for Russian extortion?!
Putin's forecast: "the gas price has broken all historical records. Today it is approaching $2,000 per thousand cubic metres of gas, which is over ten times last year’s average price."
Revisiting the Joint Statement of the United States and Germany on Support for Ukraine, European Energy Security, and our Climate Goals: "We recommit ourselves today to push back against Russian aggression and malign activities in Ukraine and beyond." state.gov/joint-statemen…
2. The US & "Germany are united in their determination to hold Russia to account for its aggression and malign activities by imposing costs via sanctions ... to respond together to Russian aggression and malign activities, including Russian efforts to use energy as a weapon."
3. "Should Russia attempt to use energy as a weapon...Germany will take action at the national level and press for effective measures at the European level, including sanctions, to limit Russian export capabilities to Europe in the energy sector, including gas..."
Excellent article by David Kramer: "U.S. policymakers have consistently failed to see Putin as a true threat who will only stop when faced with serious pushback." politico.com/news/magazine/…
"“playing nice” with Putin plays right into his playbook. While Biden may seek “predictability and stability” in the U.S.-Russia relationship, Putin’s end goal is precisely to stir up as much instability as possible."
David Kramer: "Every time the West responds weakly or not at all, he pushes even further with his destabilization efforts."
Conclusion: "Time to take the gloves off and go after the assets of Putin and his inner circle. Time to back up our warnings with actions."
The Joint Statement on the U.S.-Ukraine Strategic Partnership adopted today looks quite impressive. whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Most important is security. The headline is: "Standing up to Russian Aggression" "The United States and Ukraine have finalized a Strategic Defense Framework that creates a foundation for the enhancement of U.S.-Ukraine strategic defense and security cooperation"
The US "is announcing a new $60 million security assistance package, including additional Javelin anti-armor systems ... to enable Ukraine to more effectively defend itself against Russian aggression. more than $400 million this year alone."
The Biden administration has issued more dubious Russia sanctions on Nord Stream 2: 12 ships & 5 entities (?) but not Nord Stream 2 AG so the work can be completed. This appears just a cloud of fog. Why? Is the intention to let Russia complete NS2? Say so! home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/…
In order to confuse us, Treasury has thrown in Navalny sanctions and non-proliferation sanctions in the same statement. It would be better for the cause if the administration explained rather than confused its policy. This in itself requires an explanation.
The Biden administration's sanctions policy becomes increasingly incomprehensible. Today it imposed a 3rd round of sanctions according to the U.S. Chemical and Biological Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991... home.treasury.gov/news/press-rel…
...but the US sanctioned only 9 low-level FSB officers & 4 domestic Russian entities, hurting nobody. These sanctions were much delayed. They should have gone after secondary trading of Russian sovereign debt & oligarchs, but did not. Why?! Explain!
Alexei Navalny stated yesterday: "the western establishment acts like Pavlov’s dog: you show them a colonel of the intelligence services and they yell, “Sanction him!”; you show them the oligarch paying the colonel, and they yell, “Invite him to Davos!”" theguardian.com/commentisfree/…