When parents refuse to accept their child coming out as gay, they almost always justify it on the basis of love. They’re convinced it’s a terrible act of self harm that will destroy their child’s lives.

They are wrong. It’s their failure to affirm their child which risks harm.
Mental distress is much higher among LGBTQ people than the rest of the population and, as a consequence, alcohol and drug abuse is higher.

One of the reasons for this is the failure of parents to accept their LGBTQ children for who they are.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Almost all LGBTQ people know other LGBTQ people suffering from mental distress linked to negative childhood experiences.

We are told “parents know what’s best for their child”. In some cases, not least many LGBTQ children, that’s not true: parents are harming their kids.
Just as parents not affirming their gay children risks major damage, the same goes for trans children. They may have the same panic and terror some parents of gay children have. But it’s that response which risks creating the greatest harm.
Fears about children making irreversible decisions they’ll regret are not borne out by the facts - detransition rates are exceptionally low, and rather than swiftly getting healthcare and surgery to affirm their gender, they’re liable to spend years on waiting lists.
So when a tweet by a committed anti trans rights activist about their trans child is approvingly circulated by other anti trans rights activists supporting their refusal to affirm their trans child - on National Coming Out Day - it’s not bullying to challenge that. It’s important
I realise that transphobia is regarded as an acceptable bigotry, and anti trans activists who have become obsessively radicalised have congregated on Twitter where they are highly organised, but this terrible harm against children will be called out whether they like it or not.
Finally, stop pretending LGBTQ people standing up for each other - not least those of us who have seen the horrible damage committed against LGBTQ people by their parents - are driven by misogyny. It’s obscene and deep down you know it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Owen Jones 🌹

Owen Jones 🌹 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @OwenJones84

1 Oct
The same people who dismissed anyone mentioning the daily relentless media monstering Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership faced as a factor in his defeat are now claiming that me, a single newspaper columnist, will single handedly make the Tories win again by criticising Keir Starmer
The same people who spent years full of self righteous indignation about the lies and broken promises of Brexiteers and Boris Johnson now say well Keir Starmer deceiving his way to the Labour leadership is fine, actually, because the left are fair game so anything goes
The same people who spent years denouncing the abuse and vitriol they received from Corbyn supporters, and for being denounced as Red Tories, are now calling me every name under the sun on my timeline, as well as a Tory for that matter
Read 6 tweets
20 Sep
The Labour leadership is reintroducing the electoral college to elect the next leader, meaning MPs' votes will be worth hundreds of times more than Labour members.

Here's what it means.
It means - conclusively - that Keir Starmer and his team lied their way to the Labour leadership, when they promised party unity, not to "trash" the 4 years preceding his victory, and to end internal navel gazing.

They wouldn't have won if they'd be honest about their intentions
It means many will ask that if Labour leadership are willing to lie their way into power in the party, they will do so again and again.

British democracy has been corrupted by liars and charlatans like Boris Johnson. How is the Labour leadership able to argue it is different?
Read 7 tweets
19 Sep
Watching a Labour MP use the full might of the Murdoch press to demonise LGBTQ Labour activists and portray themselves as the real victim - when many LGBTQ people attending Labour Conference are actual victims of real and surging hate crimes - makes make sick to my stomach.
This has been pinned to my fridge for the last 2 years.

That's because, unlike the obsessive anti-trans cult, I've actually been repeatedly physically targeted - and beaten up! - for being a) left-wing and b) gay.

Yet bigots are portrayed as the real victims in this country.
LGBTQ and/or left-wing? - Suffer threats of physical violence which have been repeatedly acted upon - get portrayed as an aggressive dangerous mob.

Obsessed with trans people? Get yelled at on twitter, and then get portrayed as a victim by the British media.
Read 5 tweets
24 Aug
Sharon Graham has won the Unite leadership.

I proudly backed Steve Turner, and felt by winning the most nominations, he'd be best placed to defeat the right-wing Gerard Coyne.

But Graham managed it which is a huge testament to her campaigning, skill and commitment.
For those of us who feared, above all else, Gerard Coyne winning - which would have been an extinction level event for the left - it is impossible to say how much of a relief his victory is.

In the end, our worst fears didn't transpire: Coyne came third - but a solid third.
How did Graham win? As a very skilful organiser, she won a base that bypassed Unite's powerful officers and won often very dedicated support among Unite's representatives.
Read 9 tweets
23 Aug
While I don't support the action against Ken Loach, Jewish friends and comrades were rightly upset by my tweet, and the tone it took, so it's important I say this.
In 1987, Loach directed a play called 'Perdition' which he defended on free speech grounds, but which was incredibly distressing to Jewish people on entirely well-founded grounds.
Here is how Jim Allen, the author of Perdition, described the play:

"the most lethal attack on Zionism ever written because it touches at the heart of the most abiding myth of modern history, the Holocaust. Because it says quite plainly that privileged Jewish leaders
Read 6 tweets
18 Aug
This is an obviously defamatory tweet, attributing a direct quote to someone that has never been made.

Richard Burgon called for reparations to Afghanistan, and we can see the United Nations' definitions of reparations below.
I presume we would all agree with the provision of medical assistance to the people of Afghanistan - after such a protracted conflict in which our government has been involved for so long - for starters.

That doesn't mean supporting the abhorrent Taliban regime, obviously.
We do owe the people of Afghanistan a huge amount, given, say, our government backed the Islamist fundamentalist mujahideen in the 1980s - whoops-a-daisy! - and our subsequent extensive military intervention.

Taking more refugees is one form of reparations for all of this.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(