The paradox is that the embodiment of the Self does not, in truth, exist which comes not through a physical process but through a cognitive condition whereby the Self morphs as the body and erroneously believes the body to be the self.
Self’s embodiment through a cognitive condition forms a core tenet in all the six systems of Indian philosophy with slight variations.
Embodiment persists so long as the erroneous cognitive condition persists; hence, right-knowledge confers liberation. Thus, when the erroneous cognition dispels, one is set free from the shackles of bondage (to the body) and to the cycles of birth and death.
The mind, in a process called vrtti, assumes the form of the target object during a conceptual act. The mind forms a vrtti both when it mentally constructs an object or when it contacts an external object to assume its form.
Perception is thus a composite process in which the Self, the mind, and the sense organs together establish a contact with the object.
Perception is direct and reveals the object in its actual form. Contact is instantaneous since the all-pervasive consciousness that appears within the body is the same consciousness that exists everywhere.
Hence, perception is nothing more than the removal of the covering of maya over the individual consciousness to reveal the conjunction that already exists with the object.
Continuing, Colonialism has been one of the most significant events in the last three hundred years or so for Indian culture. What exactly is immoral about this?
‘Colonial consciousness’, an important thesis of Balu’s research program, is a framework that denies access to our experience and makes us reproduce some sets of colonial ideas as though they describe our experience.
This process continues to the present times much after the colonizers have left. British colonialism introduced the framework about the superiority of the western culture as ‘objective’ or ‘scientific’ that was both presupposed and proved. The colonized accepted this.
Secular historians, standing against the ‘religiosity’ of the masses, taught us that our stories were merely disguised historiographies, poetic exaggerations, or lies by our ancestors. In the western intellectual trad, the dominant idea is that myths are false and facts are true
However, growing up as Indians, we learn that we should treat our stories and epics (Itihasas) as different from the claims of our history, geography, and science lessons. As Dr Balu asks, ‘What do we want, a history or a past?’
We are pleased to announce the schedule for the Conference on Oneness being held in collaboration @Chinmaya_VV. We are overwhelmed with the response received from the speakers and are deeply grateful to all the 65 scholars for their presence and papers.