SCOOP: Students at one of the oldest and most prestigious boys schools in the United States could soon face expulsion for a single "misplaced" joke, according to a draft "anti-bias" policy obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
Long seen as a conservative holdout among private schools,
St. Albans is considering a crackdown on "harmful" speech that prioritizes the impact of the speech rather than the intent of the speaker.
"It is the impact of hate speech, rather than the intent of those perpetrating it, that is of utmost importance," the draft policy states. As such, boys could be expelled "even in the case of a single expression, act, or gesture"—including "misplaced humor.”
Reporting infractions would be a communal responsibility. “We also expect that anyone, whether student, faculty, staff, or family member, who witnesses, or has knowledge of an incident of hate speech, will report the incident to the appropriate individual," the policy reads.
Speech codes are now de rigueur at elite private schools, where an ever-expanding crop of diversity professionals has institutionalized an ever-expanding definition of "hate." That definition is enforced by bias reporting systems that encourage students to flag offensive speech.
At St. Mark’s School in Massachusetts, students can report their peers anonymously via an online form, set up in 2020 as part of the school’s "antiracist action plan." stmarksschool.org/campus-life/co…
Now, even even the most old-fashioned private schools are becoming fluent in the language of left-wing identity politics. freebeacon.com/campus/leaked-…
St. Albans—which refers to Hispanic students as "Latinx," has replaced Columbus Day with "Indigenous People’s Day," sponsors an "Alliance of White Antiracists," and costs over $50,000 a year—is often seen as more conservative than its co-ed counterparts.
Boys must wear formal attire and attend weekly Anglican chapels, whose liturgy one alum described as "traditional." Lunch is served family-style in a 100-year-old dining hall called "the Refectory," which the school rents out for private dinners.
“St. Albans used to have a simple honor code: Don’t lie, cheat, or steal," an alumnus of the school said. "Everything else was adjudicated human-to-human. Now boys are being policed for humor and innocuous comments are subject to the highest form of punishment."
That punishment will presumably be doled out by the school’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) committee, which enlists 21 teachers and administrators. stalbansschool.org/about/diversit…
The committee has injected "antiracism" into nearly every facet of school life: In June 2020, all faculty and staff were required to read Ibram Kendi’s How to Be an Antiracist; that September, all middle and high school students read Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me.
St. Albans also curates an extensive list of anti-racist "resources," including Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility and an introductory textbook on critical race theory. stalbansschool.org/about/diversit…
This transformation has been encouraged by the accreditation bureaucracy to which St. Albans belongs. St. Albans is a member of the Association of Independent Maryland and D.C. Schools, which expects that "diversity practice" be "an organic part of every area of school life."
The Association of Independent Maryland and D.C. Schools, in turn, is a member of the National Association of Independent Schools, which expects all of its "approved accreditors" to mandate DEI programming.
Under those pressures, the best private schools in the nation’s capitol have all come to resemble each other. Even Landon, perhaps the most conservative boys school in the D.C. area, hired a diversity consultant last year to "evaluate the lived experience of the Landon program."
As part of that evaluation, students were asked to join focus groups "based on how one identifies"—including, at the all-boys school, gender identity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Administrators at Yale Law School spent weeks pressuring a student to apologize for a "triggering" email he sent out. Part of what made the email "triggering," the administrators told the student, was his membership in a conservative organization. 🧵freebeacon.com/campus/a-yale-…
The second-year law student, a member of both the Native American Law Students Association and the conservative Federalist Society, had invited classmates to an event cohosted by the two groups. Here is what the student wrote in an email to the Native American listserv:
The student is part Cherokee, the Indian tribe that was forcibly displaced during the infamous Trail of Tears.
Within minutes, the email elicited furious accusations of racism from his classmates, several of whom alleged that the term "trap house" indicated a blackface party.
James Zimmermann was the principal clarinetist of the Nashville Symphony Orchestra for more than a decade—until he was fired last February over allegations of racial harassment.
What happened to him, and to the orchestra, would soon happen everywhere. 🧵
To hear his accusers tell it, Zimmermann had insulted, intimidated, and even stalked his black colleagues, going so far as to menacingly drive by their homes. But six of Zimmermann’s ex-colleagues and the orchestra’s own documents tell a very different story.
They suggest that Zimmermann himself was the target of a witch hunt, instigated by a black oboist whom Zimmermann had stuck his neck out to help.
They also suggest that the orchestra lied about Zimmermann's disciplinary record in order to justify firing him.
Some scientists are now arguing we don't need boosters because the vaccine remains effective against severe disease. But those same scientists have spent months warning that Delta necessitates a return to masks and social distancing—even for the vaccinated.freebeacon.com/coronavirus/cr…
The scientists from the WHO and FDA who weighed in against boosters this week have consistently opposed lifting public health restrictions in the face of new variants. But that guidance that seems to contradict their argument about the mildness of breakthrough cases.
The vaccinated "need to continue to wear masks," the World Health Organization's chief scientist, Soumya Swaminathan, tweeted in August, adding that the Delta variant "demands that."
To Noah’s more serious point, yes, you do need an alternative narrative. But narrative is the key word. The alternative to CRT is not going to tell “the whole story”, any more than CRT will. What we’re really debating is which set of omissions/distortions is the least bad.
Is colorblind 90s liberalism optimal? Maybe not!
But to say “it has blind spots and limits” isn’t a counterargument. The same could be said, just as convincingly, of CRT.
Remember that "inclusive communication" guide the CDC put out the other week? The agency didn't have to do very much work on it. Instead, it drew on a network of nonprofits that are institutionalizing progressivism as public health’s lingua franca.
The guide included statements like "health equity is intersectional" and described "diabetics" and "the homeless" as "dehumanizing language." Public health communications, it said, "should reflect and speak to the needs of" a wide range of identities.
For example, "assigned male/female at birth" is preferable to "biologically male/female," according to the guide—which also stresses that public health officials should "avoid jargon and use straightforward, easy to understand language." cdc.gov/healthcommunic…
SCOOP: The American Bar Association is poised to mandate diversity training and affirmative action at all of its accredited law schools, a move top legal scholars say could jeopardize academic freedom and force schools to violate federal law.
The ABA accredits nearly every law school in the US. It is is mulling a plan that would require schools to "provide education" on "cross-cultural competency," including a mandatory ethics course instructing students that they have an obligation to fight "racism in the law."
Schools would also be required to "take effective actions" to "diversify" their student bodies—even when doing so risks violating a law that "purports to prohibit consideration of" race or ethnicity.
In order to remain accredited, law schools might have to break the law.