Historians, much like Journalists, have eroded themselves over the past 70 years but indulging more in ideological bunkum than what their profession entails.
It is the reason why the "Professional Historian" gets no attention at best and his jeered at, at worst.
* by indulging.
Lay people had no say in historical matters for many years. Professional Historians wrote whatever they wanted.
Turns out there were so many blunders that it is difficult to take any historian seriously. Unless he / she proves otherwise.
There are some people who value the scabbard over the sword.
He gets called to the Conclave BECAUSE he has launched 2 scholarly books on Savarkar and not the other way round.
Why don't you, with your added qualification of Professional Historian produce a sufficiently strong counter ?
Professional Historians have had all the time in the world to write good history books. But, for example in Maratha History, a @MulaMutha still does better than all of them put together through evidence based research.
This, after he has spent most of his life in the Navy.
Flashy lights and slick videos can get someone only thus far, especially in today's age where every page is passed through a sieve.
A book dealing with History has to be good. Else it will get called out for flaws in no time.
What if you find that all our doctors are indulging in fake cures and quackery ?
Thats whats happened to Professional Historians.
Loss of credibility.
But the MBBS degree has kept it's respect, hence only qualified doctors are called to talk about medicine.
While we are on topic of Professional Historians ..this article is well worth your time.
An invasion such as Somnath is also conveniently swept under some So Mannat fairy tale. Ghaznavi destroyed it because it protected the So Mannat idol from Arabia. Lulz.
Let me know if this was found anywhere in the textbooks :
The " Padarth" of the Jagannath Puri idols was chased by Kala Pahar all the way to Lake Chilka.
In fact there are many occasions that the murtis were moved.