Nancy’s continued relationship with @WomensSportsFdn dependent on no discussion, writing or advocacy regarding sexual abuse, harassment or allegations, as either a private citizen, on behalf of WSF or on behalf of anyone else.
Rather than submit all documents, erase all hard drives and surrender copyright for 30 years of legal work and advocacy for WSF, Nancy told them to stuff their severance pay and took everything. 👏
Why would a sports foundations set up to advocate for female athletes try to stop a consultant talking about sexual abuse of female athletes in sport?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. A 17 year old woman with no menstruation is examined and found to have no palatable gonads (no testes/ovaries) and a small uterus. Her karyotype was identified as XY.
This looks like Swyer Syndrome.
2. Examination of this woman’s family history revealed, on her mother’s side, multiple family members with infertility, ambiguous genitalia etc.
Suggests she inherited her disorder from Mum, which is a bit odd, because her Mum is clearly fertile and apparently typical female.
This is what a mediocre male kick-boxer can do to an elite female kick-boxer.
You have a special duty, more than most other governing bodies, to protect your female athletes, as far as is possible within the spirit of the sport, from harm.
Those interviewees who supported inclusion of transgender people, often without any restriction or requirement, made very cogent arguments as to why others were wrong and that over time, they would be shown to have been on “wrong side of history”.
It was suggested that those transgender individuals who wanted to participate in sport were looking to feel part of something: They had often endured a difficult adolescence but perhaps sport was a significant part in their previous life, and they were reluctant to lose this.
‘Case-by-case’ assessment is unlikely to be practical nor verifiable for entry into gender [sex] affected sports.
NGBs [national governing bodies] may wish to consider the following when determining the appropriateness of this:
> It has not been scientifically validated as to whether any parameters of physical capacity or ability can be defined with a certain cut-off point at which someone is considered appropriately ‘female’ or appropriately ‘male’.