It's always so interesting reading worshipful interviews with Trump. Because he can't really stay on topic, there's a lot of talk about the things he owns and very little in the way of direct quotes.
"We discussed" this. Or he "rattled off" that. But few quotes.
What was in the "detailed" list of irregularities?
What was Trump's excellent advice for how to strengthen the GOP during the midterms? What were the arcane rules he was noting!?
You could have literally just written "he said a bunch of smart stuff."
I especially love the part where Hemingway, anticipating that people will think her interviews suck, says she's just not the sort of interviewer who expects people to answer her questions.
Instead they can just talk to her about whatever and she'll write it up glowingly.
Some weird glossy prose about how rich everyone is, followed by a weird downplaying of the fraud claims. "There's no proof of fraud but there was INTERFERENCE."
Which is to say, people wrote and said mean things about Trump. Which is a KIND of fraud I guess.
The "President's rhetoric" (again no direct quotes) but here, she says "he knows" what happened was unconstitutional, and then says that what happened was "arguably" unconstitutional.
Of course, waiting until after the election to challenge the rules didn't help.
When talking about Ben Sasse criticizing Trump, Hemingway uses some language familiar to anyone who's read the Constitution's treason clause.
You have to love that the man called COVID a hoax and then had this response after his own bout with it.
A classic ending to the piece, in which she provides a small advertisement for how great Mar-a-Lago is and is compensated by a "free" meal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I read the lawsuit looking for a provably false statement of fact, and as far as I can tell, it's that Taibbi made more money during the Twitter files saga.
315,000 people voted early in Fulton County. Someone should have signed the machine count tallies, to show they were verified.
/1
If a Fulton County employee had done this, I am skeptical that the people claiming fraud would have said "oh damn, they signed off on the counts? I guess that means everything was above board."
Chances are, the fraud theorists would say Fulton just lied when they signed. /2
However, because those signatures are absent, a lof of fraud folks are saying this proves the election was stolen.
Most of them seem to misunderstand the issue. They think there's a problem with like, signature matching or proving the ballots were real.
It was 2011, and 200 people were gathering in South Atlanta for a repast, (a big post-funeral meal) setting up tablecloths and getting coolers.
The neighborhood was just saying a prayer when Javenski Hilton learned that a drug dealer had broken into his car. /1
Hilton knew the drug dealer. It was his girlfriend, Tomika Webb. She had loaned him some money so he could buy crack and share the profits with her, but he hadn't paid him back. /2
Hilton got to his car and Webb was there, rummaging through it for drugs or money. When she saw Hilton, she started screaming and threatening him.
A neighbor, Patrick Walker, could tell this was going to end badly, and so he immediately called police. /3
If you chase someone with your car, that is aggravated assault. And you cannot be justified doing something once you commit a felony. You can't shoot an armed homeowner, for instance, if he tries to stop you from burglarizing his house.
Now let's say it turns out that the armed homeowner is a murderer.
That shit isn't relevant, because no set of facts about his past make it ok to break into his house and shoot him.