Top Biden administration officials meet to discuss rising gasoline and natural gas prices, as the president faces growing pressure to keep a lid on inflation bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Not that much admin can do to reduce energy price pressures, since these are global markets. What little they can do would probably not have much effect and some of those tools (e.g. using emergency powers to curtail exports of oil & nat gas) would tick off our European allies
My fear is that admin might also over-respond to near-term shock. Politicals might look at rising energy prices and say hey, maybe now's not time to push climate transition stuff after all, since GOP opportunists will conflate green policy w/ what's behind this energy crunch
That's not the case of course. If anything, lesson from this energy crunch is that fossil fuels are not so "resilient" after all. If we want more reliable, cheaper energy sooner, we need to make policy changes that accelerate the transition to clean energy washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Catherine Rampell

Catherine Rampell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @crampell

14 Oct
Last year the share of Americans saying they wanted government to do more to solve the country's problems hit a record high, 54%. Probably driven by pandemic + bungled response from Trump admin.
Share is now back down to 43%. news.gallup.com/poll/355838/am… Image
All party groups -- including Democrats! -- are less likely now than a year ago to favor a more active government role. But independents' opinions have changed the most Image
This development seems like it will be an enormous problem for the Dem Party. Dem officials argue that 'hey, every major plank of our agenda is popular - let's do it all!' And it's true, almost every policy polls well in isolation (child care, paid leave, etc). But...
Read 6 tweets
13 Oct
This is part of the latest stage of the right's ongoing public-service purge. (thread)
When Trump was in office, the purge was a centralized, top-down effort, with explicit firings or job conditions made so intolerable by political appointees (relocating a scientist's job 1,000 mi away; subverting asylum officials' work) that people left. washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump…
On his way out the door, Trump even laid the groundwork for a more systemic mass firing through an exec order - but he never completed his task, and Biden subsequently issued his own EO rescinding Trump's measures. washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump…
Read 8 tweets
8 Oct
Would read an in-depth writeup on the well-oiled right-wing hate-click/harassment machine. In my experience/observation it goes something like this...
Some right-wing figure does a Twitter “dunk” on someone else (sometimes not actually a dunk but rather a misunderstanding, unintentional or willful, of the issue by the dunker). Then other followers pile on.
Then Fox News writes an entire news story (?) about just the tweets and replies, characterizing them as someone getting "destroyed" or whatever.
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct
Immigrants have been awarded 38%, or 40 of 104, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in chemistry, medicine and physics since 2000, per @NFAPResearch. Share going back to 1901 is 35% nfap.com/wp-content/upl… Image
This is true, the best and brightest researchers often want to come here - but we have not always let them in!
.@PMoserEcon and @san_muly have a great paper quantifying the costs to US research & innovation from the 1920s national-origins quota system for instance dropbox.com/s/005ikevo7e34…
Read 5 tweets
6 Oct
This is an excellent question, and one I haven't been able to get an answer to when talking with White House/Cap Hill Dems. I think the answer could be something like...
For months Dems underestimated GOP's genuine commitment to blocking debt limit fix thru regular order. Ds believed Rs might not vote for suspension/hike but also wouldn't filibuster - i.e., they'd do as Ds did before in a symbolic vote against limit hike
Now D’s are reacting to that disillusionment by saying ‘golly gee I guess we really can’t trust those R’s to commit to anything cooperative in advance!’ Hence Dems' recent pivot to talking about eliminating the filibuster (which Manchin opposes)
Read 5 tweets
6 Oct
So, who is actually "playing Russian roulette with [the/our] economy"? ImageImage
My view is: GOP is being actively reckless, deliberately blocking a debt limit increase/suspension; Dems have mostly been naive, and too slow to recognize they needed to act on their own
Best way to prevent *anyone* from playing Russian roulette, in any case, is take away the gun
However this is resolved in near-term -- and I genuinely don't know how, given political and time constraints obstructing every pathway out of this -- I hope the conclusion Congress reaches is: get rid of the debt limit once and for all.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(